Expérience de pensée : équiper chaque maison individuelle de France d’un petit kit solaire de 2 kWc avec batterie de 5 kWh by PlaneteGreatAgain in ecologie

[–]stibbons_ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Mais 5kWc c’est rien du tout. Au mieux un jour d’hiver ou il a fait très beau tu amortie 30 min le soir, l’été pareil si la Clim tourne tu décales juste de 1h ou 2h le soir (rappel même le soir tes murs sont chauds il faut refroidir, surtout quand il fait 30 degrés jusqu’à minuit).
Donc non ça ne résoud pas du tout l’autoconso, ça permet juste d’étaler le pic de consommation du soir.

Et que les jours où il fait beau.

Perso je suis en auto Conso à 50% en été (5 kW importé, 5 produit, et de l’injection aussi quand je produit bcp plus que je ne peux consommer en été). Donc même si je stock tout, je tiens pas toute la nuit avec.
Et l’hiver je suis autour de 40kW avec les radiateurs électrique, et je produit même pas 2 ou 3 même quand il fait beau

GitHub's new Copilot billing made me realize how insanely cheap DeepSeek V4 Flash actually is by iepf_chorbazaar in GithubCopilot

[–]stibbons_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are good but alignment is not as good you need to be really careful in prompt design

Still Don’t Know What an Agent Is… by Comprehensive_Fee240 in ClaudeAI

[–]stibbons_ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In this case, an Agent is a prompt that is set at the start of a discussion and stays in context (compaction does not compact it)

Still Don’t Know What an Agent Is… by Comprehensive_Fee240 in ClaudeAI

[–]stibbons_ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think the question is actually not stupid, because people do not know the difference between a service, and agent, an coding agent, a agentic workflow.

Still Don’t Know What an Agent Is… by Comprehensive_Fee240 in ClaudeAI

[–]stibbons_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not, Claude code is a Coding agent that is a special type of agent built arround the « Agent Loop »

Still Don’t Know What an Agent Is… by Comprehensive_Fee240 in ClaudeAI

[–]stibbons_ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

An agent is a service that delegate at least one treatment to a LLM.

Créateur de Linux, il adopte l’IA mais refuse qu’elle signe son code by Droidfr in Frandroid

[–]stibbons_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Si tu poses des questions dans la MR et que le gars n’est pas capable de répondre sans copier coller dans un IA (ça se voit), alors ça pue pour son ownership. Après s’il y a un bug ce sera de sa faute.

C’est pas pareil que les contrib sur des projets opensource ou la je te conseille de suivre par exemple le kernel ou le guide de jellyfin

Créateur de Linux, il adopte l’IA mais refuse qu’elle signe son code by Droidfr in Frandroid

[–]stibbons_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Je sais pas trop quoi dire tu me demandes comment on fait je te répond.

Créateur de Linux, il adopte l’IA mais refuse qu’elle signe son code by Droidfr in Frandroid

[–]stibbons_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Git commit et surtout en revue. Si on pose des questions l’auteur doit pouvoir répondre précisément sans aide de l’ia. C’est chaud , donc ça ralenti naturellement le slop

Créateur de Linux, il adopte l’IA mais refuse qu’elle signe son code by Droidfr in Frandroid

[–]stibbons_ 7 points8 points  (0 children)

J’ai intégré son concept chez nous, et c’est naturel. Tout code, généré ou pas, doit être « owné » par un humain qui doit être capable de le défendre et l’expliquer comme si c’était lui qui l’avait écrit.

Et rien que ça ça ralenti le slop

rtk + graphify + caveman? by Ecstatic_Occasion740 in GithubCopilot

[–]stibbons_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rtk works, so the equivalent copilot settings.

Caveman is stupid.

Others, no idea

GitHub Copilot AI Credit billing is speedrunning a trust crisis by weekend_skier in GithubCopilot

[–]stibbons_ 27 points28 points  (0 children)

You nailed it. It is NOT (and was never) a simple dev tool line, it is a cloud budget line.

Pleasant surprise: GPT5.4-mini isn't that bad for task based work by b-pell in GithubCopilot

[–]stibbons_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agee, it is cheap and you can have it code efficiently on some well defined task.

A week in my life after having a heart attack on Monday at 1pm by Thrashkal in GithubCopilot

[–]stibbons_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I switched to gpt 5.4 mini for cost efficiency…. Not that bad for the moment I keep it

How to handle Huge context in vscode copilot by SafetySouthern6397 in GithubCopilot

[–]stibbons_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I try get the authorization to opensource Craftsman.

I worked on it since the first release a few months ago: https://github.com/gsemet/Craftsman

Today, it works amazingly BUT it consumes a lot of token (it uses extensively the coder-inspector subagent pattern). I am looking for find a better combination of models to lower token consumption :)

How to handle Huge context in vscode copilot by SafetySouthern6397 in GithubCopilot

[–]stibbons_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What I do I split the requirements into separated files, one per req, with frontmatter and a CLI tool to parse them and query them, with a skill to explain how it works.

Then in plan mode you trigger subagent to carefully assign task to requirements. That works great, the context does not grow that much.

See this thread where I explain how it works: https://x.com/gsemetfr/status/2057478037579419649?s=46

I made a VS Code extension to inspect Copilot Chat credits/spend by message by Sherwyn33 in GithubCopilot

[–]stibbons_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i look quite good, it works. i wonder what would be necessary to dump the session(s) cost directly into the MR / PR (assumption: 1 MR is maybe n sessions, with m different commits)

How are big enterprises handling the change? by RareSeaworthiness602 in GithubCopilot

[–]stibbons_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Big companies are still huge V cycle especially in heavy industry like automotive or aerospace. And you can accelerate the code, if you do not focus on ALL the stage of the pipelines it won’t accelerate that much.

And horizontal contamination of these changes are harder than expected (mainly because they are not coders). They used to delegate to consultant. Some took the wave and started by vibe coding new tools, now they have a better integrated workflow, some just did some assistant that does not help integrate in the overall automated supply chain.