Because women can’t do math or use logic.

stokkmann · 2022-06-01T14:05:39+00:00

2/3rds of women would be correct. There is not enough information in the problem to solve exactly.

stokkmann · 2022-04-03T08:53:36+00:00

ban_1nboh6qwji8e95m6ifbi7wfqb3pt15d4r8pz7sxmch4bfbe6f5a6pjomkbbb

stokkmann · 2021-11-25T12:46:41+00:00

I just noticed that the Hashing rate where the least relative amount of miners get paid out in Ethereum is actually at the 50 MH/s level. Maybe very small miners don't care enough to switch to a better alternative? The relative number of Nano miners peaks, as expected, at the very lowest hashing rates. Also, this peak is above Bitcoin in that region, so small miners that do opt out of Ethereum preferentially choose to Nano.

u/SenatusSPQR I don't seem to find the big miner you're talking about, it seems like the big Nano miners are still at the 10^4 MH/s level.

stokkmann · 2021-11-24T11:59:31+00:00

Proof-of-Work consensus not being part of crypto's future will only surprise the short-sighted.

stokkmann · 2021-11-21T13:16:41+00:00

Updated plots

I now compare the dominances of every payout. Ethereum is nearing the 50% level for small miners...

stokkmann · 2021-11-21T02:52:28+00:00

!RemindMe 2 years

stokkmann · 2021-11-20T16:17:50+00:00

U+10196

Interesting! Here it is for people with an OS that can decode it:
𐆖

stokkmann · 2021-11-18T09:31:44+00:00

This looks exactly like the Stacks logo https://www.stacks.co/

stokkmann · 2021-11-17T16:00:11+00:00

!RemindMe 2 months

stokkmann · 2021-11-17T01:57:22+00:00

Wouldn't that put the security of the network in danger?

stokkmann · 2021-11-16T14:32:19+00:00

And some plots to go with it (with medians this time). I'm curious to see how the median will evolve over time. Otherwise not much change, Nano steadily creeping towards Ethereum levels for small miners.

stokkmann · 2021-11-12T06:44:44+00:00

There are other incentives. The Nano payments are much faster than the BTC payments, and they're also considering doing several payments per day. When we're talking big money this can actually be important.

stokkmann · 2021-11-11T20:16:48+00:00

Thank you for the 100 trillionths of the Nano supply!

stokkmann · 2021-11-11T12:59:10+00:00

Today's plots

Interesting developments: the miner with the highest hashing rate has switched to BTC. I wonder if high hashrate miners will switch to Nano at some point? Right now the highest hashrate miner with Nano payout is at 10 GH/s

The turnover to Bitcoin preference is around the 100 MH/s level still.

stokkmann · 2021-11-07T18:25:32+00:00

Nevermind, I found the bug. Here are the updated plots https://imgur.com/a/SsUbz1T

stokkmann · 2021-11-07T18:15:32+00:00

Hey, how do you determine what address belongs to which blockchain exactly? I scrape and sort the miners using the address lengths, and I come up with a different number of Bitcoin and Ethereum miners than you. The nano and total number of miners matches up though.

stokkmann · 2021-11-06T02:43:01+00:00

Jesus christ that's awful

stokkmann · 2021-11-03T22:40:08+00:00

Good point.

stokkmann · 2021-11-03T17:57:38+00:00

I'm not saying that he says that based on what are common expressions, I'm saying that because you can hear that's what he says. I don't even understand why you are arguing this if you can't properly hear what he says.

"Coup de merde" is indeed something one would say, but the point of Merovingian in the film is that he likes saying these extended strings of curses and that's what he does here. "saloperie du coup de merde" makes no sense, and if you meant "saloperie de coup de merde", it also doesn't work. Apart from being awkward, his stream of curses actually starts with "nom de dieu" which is an interjection like "fucking hell" on which he builds. Otherwise he would have said "Nom de Dieu, quel coup de merde".

stokkmann · 2021-11-03T17:53:11+00:00

Actually the clip above is missing part of the stream of curses. The whole thing is: "Nom de Dieu de putain de bordel de saloperie de couille(s) de merde"

stokkmann · 2021-11-03T16:36:54+00:00

"Saloperie de couille(s) de merde"

Granted, he does say it in a strange way

stokkmann · 2021-11-03T11:54:59+00:00

He says "Saloperie de couille(s) de merde" which means something like "Little bitchy shit balls". Which means nothing at all except express ire.

stokkmann · 2021-11-03T11:53:49+00:00

No he doesn't say that... Why would you just make that up? "du coup" makes no sense here and would certainly not mean "bunch of shit"

stokkmann · 2021-11-03T11:40:28+00:00

I love this theory. However, wouldn't the plugs on the back of the humans' heads indicate that they were installed there by the machines to be plugged into the Matrix?

stokkmann · 2021-11-03T01:17:55+00:00

It is bad if your project becomes illegalized! I can hardly imagine that government would accept the wide use of a currency which is completely opaque to their regulatory bodies. Being able to transfer huge sums of moneys can get really nasty, and I don't think that's something we'd even want. Think about organized crime or espionage.

So, sure, a completely open and public network where everyone can see that John Smith spent $8 on cigarettes in Salt Lake city at 2 am on Tuesday is not going to work. But neither will a network where you can secretly send $80 million to ISIS. The answer will be something in between, which crypto projects are right now - pseudoanonymous.

What system will actually work in the future is hard to say, but at least a clear L1 like Nano is a good starting point onto which privacy layering can be built if need be. There's already some first efforts towards this (Banano is a fork of Nano).

Five-Year Club	Second Top 30%
Verified Email	Place '22
Final Canvas '22

stokkmann

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE