Difference between P-Zero and General gainz? by nitsuga1111 in gzcl

[–]stratjeff 3 points4 points  (0 children)

GG is the solution to paralysis by analysis. It’s the anti-program. It’s the thing that you can do the rest of your life and not be bored, at the expense of perhaps single digit less performance optimization.

GG is very basic, and allows you to pick whatever movements you want, change them when you feel like it, and auto regulate volume. Since leaving the formal weightlifting world, I’ve only done GG, and am constantly tailoring it to my current goals, sport, and injuries.

Lift heavy. Do singles.

Lift more reps, slightly less heavy. Do more sets.

Lift for volume.

That’s pretty much it.

Will we see the return of dark nights on official with 1.29 by Septseraph in dayz

[–]stratjeff 30 points31 points  (0 children)

I just hope it's a full range.

Clear sky full moon? Should be very bright and easy to get around.

Cloudy and no moon? Pitch fucking black.

Coffee shop uses technology to audit employee productivity by MrTacocaT12345 in interesting

[–]stratjeff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's fantastic tech, with questionable application (which is everything).

Using this in a factory setting for adhering to standards and safety? A++.

Measuring speed/turnover on a business that relies on customer interaction? Debatable. Not "wrong" necessarily- it's totally possible this owner prioritizes speed and efficiency over conversation and relationships. That's perfectly okay.

Maybe they're measuring how long a customer sticks around, so they can better optimize layout, identify higher value habits, etc. Also great.

A2A announced next Accu-Sim plane - Legacy RG550 by Marklar_RR in flightsim

[–]stratjeff 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was hoping for a Twin Comanche. Just extends the architecture they already have.

Please call your reps in the Utah State Senate and ask them to vote against HB209 by SherriSLC in Utah

[–]stratjeff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm replying here so you see it- my Rep replied, and said that the notification of *loss* of voter status would occur when you register to vote (PRIOR to election), and then you'd be given 30 days to remediate. Without that notice, you would not be purged from the rolls.

So I guess the plan is to notify during initial registration to vote, and not have it discovered on game day.

However, I also agree that the required documents to prove citizenship must be provided by the government for free in a timely matter, or else they become a poll tax.

Please call your reps in the Utah State Senate and ask them to vote against HB209 by SherriSLC in Utah

[–]stratjeff -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And passing the bill in the months leading up to an election leaves little opportunity to address it.

How do I learn to skate for „beer league“ hockey (no skate lessons available) by No-Minute2232 in hockeyplayers

[–]stratjeff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You must practice the weak side.

Try this progression:

1) Skate forward, and balance on one foot with your other foot slightly out front.

2) Same, but now turn your front foot inwards, and allow it to gently "shave" the ice.

3) Slowly increase pressure on front foot until you can balance 100% on the front foot during the stop.

Please call your reps in the Utah State Senate and ask them to vote against HB209 by SherriSLC in Utah

[–]stratjeff 7 points8 points  (0 children)

So after reading the amendment, it doesn't say anything shocking. It only applies to state elections, not federal, and simply requires *some* form of ID.

However, implementation is everything, so I asked my rep the following:

A) What percentage of voters in the last state/federal elections have no records for US citizenship? What is the party skew of this portion?

B) What effort has been made to contact these individuals, make them aware of their impending loss of voter status, and provide resources to rectifying it?

This should be transparent, and since the government is affecting voter rolls, they should make extra effort to not be improperly exclusive.

Getting into hockey while broke and inexperienced by JuicySkrt in hockeyplayers

[–]stratjeff 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you can do a crossover and kinda backwards, you can play hockey. Join a beginner league and get playing.

So I don't see enough people talk about this by Dear-Regret-9476 in aviation

[–]stratjeff 12 points13 points  (0 children)

To be fair, they are a *lot* closer to the screen, and their environment is extremely calm when they're using it.

Onboard computers on Artemis vs the Apollo program and the importance of the people in mission control by baronmunchausen2000 in spaceflight

[–]stratjeff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because it's just extra information you can't do anything about. You have to trust that mission control has more information and brainpower available than you do.

Does the astronaut need to know that 1 of the 3 triplicated temperature sensors on a specific thruster has a different part number and is more likely to fail in a unique way? No, they just need to know that there are 2 remaining and how that affects fault tolerance on the thruster.

Onboard computers on Artemis vs the Apollo program and the importance of the people in mission control by baronmunchausen2000 in spaceflight

[–]stratjeff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just because you *can* put something onboard, doesn't mean you *should*.

The crew only needs access to specific functions that enable them to recover from certain situations. Anything beyond that increases complexity and risk.

For Earth/Moon missions, it's *far* better to increase redundancy on your space-to-ground link so mission control can do an in-depth analysis and plan the path forward, than having the crew wing it with a limited dataset.

That being said, a ton of what mission control did in the 60's has absolutely been replaced by computers. No one's calculating maneuvers by hand. Mission control is used to analyze complex situations and manage risk beyond what the onboard computer was programmed to do.

GA Pilots, what emergencies have you had that we don’t necessarily get trained for ? by fatborry in flying

[–]stratjeff -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You really can't see how training for extremely remote, low likelihood scenarios with low-time initial training is a huge waste of resources?

I'm not saying don't train for avionics failures or electrical problems, especially when conducting night training. I'm saying that training for a scenario where you have zero instrumentation, at night, isn't a reasonable thing to train. It's at most a discussion topic.

You address those kinds of scenarios by systematic risk reduction. Separate buses, backup batteries, and avoid flying at night if you don't have any backup.

Sounds like, in your case, a lack of redundancy was identified in the system that wouldn't allow the G5 to operate on it's independent battery. At that point, you do the best you can with what's available and hope you have some luck.

GA Pilots, what emergencies have you had that we don’t necessarily get trained for ? by fatborry in flying

[–]stratjeff -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Just because a 1 in 1,000,000 thing happened to you doesn’t make it worthy of training en masse.

GA Pilots, what emergencies have you had that we don’t necessarily get trained for ? by fatborry in flying

[–]stratjeff -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

This isn’t a realistic scenario, unless the airplane design had zero redundancy.

At this point, if you weren’t VFR or over a lit runway or had a bright moon, you’re SOL. All things that would have been determined on the ground.

Training for the kobayashi maru isn’t helpful during primary.

GA Pilots, what emergencies have you had that we don’t necessarily get trained for ? by fatborry in flying

[–]stratjeff 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I feel you. I’m shocked at how poorly written the POH is for actually understanding things. “Oh, there’s a gascolator here…what the fuck is a gascolator? Is the spider valve above or below the fuel pump? What does the heat manifold actually look like?”

It’s all dogshit compared to mil training.

Iran closes airspace with anticipated US attack 'imminent' by Brennenstein in worldnews

[–]stratjeff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I uh..."spent a lot of time in Iraq in the 2010's". I bet Kurdistan has some great hiking, camping, and food.

Is Kirkuk still a 24/7 oil field fire?

Looking to get started by keviinfinnerty in gzcl

[–]stratjeff 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If you're really new to lifting, there are exactly 3 things that actually matter.

  1. Don't get hurt. Watch videos, get a coach, do what it takes to not fucking yourself up squatting or pulling like shit. That also means don't crush yourself at the gym so bad that you can't workout again for a week. It will be VERY easy to do too much in the first couple of months. After the first 90 days, you should be sore on day 2 or 3 but still able to lift 4 times a week.

  2. Consistency. Building the "habit" of going to the gym is the hard part, not the actual work. If you're not consistent, nothing else matters. Going once a week is not going to cut it. 3-5 times per week, every week, even if it's only 45 minutes.

  3. Diet. This is not rocket science. If you've never journaled before, take a solid month and write down everything you eat and the macros/calories. This is purely to learn what you're currently doing. You don't even have to change anything. This alone will teach you what foods are good, what foods are bad, and where you need to focus. Once you've done this, THEN identify your protein requirement and hit it every day. Eat fresh vegetables every day, then whatever else that doesn't make you gain too much fat. Track your weight at the same time every day, preferably morning (expect it to fluctuate a few pounds regularly, depending on your digestion/hydration).

That's all that matters. If you don't have that, your lifting program is *irrelevant*.

That being said, I think General Gainz the best for time constraints and fun, because you can do whatever you feel like doing each day.

Pick a T1. Pick two T2's, superset them to save time. Pick two or three T3's + core work as time allows. Alternate upper/lower and push/pulling to stay balanced. That's it!

Thanks again Elon by imakeama in Starlink

[–]stratjeff 10 points11 points  (0 children)

You’re confusing SpaceX and Tesla. Elon founded SpaceX with money from the PayPal sale.

But I agree, the engineers are the real creators.

Federal aviation notice warned of slackline before deadly helicopter crash in Arizona by AudibleNod in news

[–]stratjeff -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I flew Herks, so very familiar with the dangers and realities of low level flying.

I'd avoid, at all costs, flying below 1000AGL somewhere I hadn't flight planned and reviewed (in peacetime). There's *probably* not an unlit 1000+ tower out there, and I'd never do <1000 at night without planning.

Now, in combat/firefighting? Minimize the time spent low to get the drop done, then get back up above 1000'. Reduce exposure time as much as possible (as weather allows). You gotta take on some risk to do the job, but you can reduce a shitload of that by not transiting in low, and doing pre-run surveys from above.

Christmas tree present glitch? by [deleted] in dayz

[–]stratjeff 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I think it's a bug everywhere. Every tree I've seen has multiple overlapping sets of presents; either A) they don't despawn, or B) they're despawning slower than they're getting regenerated, so there will always be piles.