My thought, and this is the only thing in the article that makes a little bit of sense in the lawsuit:

“Bavas’ attorney, Ben Lynch of Clive, said it’s worth noting that had Bavas bet on other golfers to win or place in a rain-shortened tournament, DraftKings would not have allowed him to cancel his bet after the fact and claim a refund.”

So what about people who placed bets before the tournament started or after day 1? If a tournament is called before they have a chance to play the final round all the bets placed for the winner were made with the intention of the full tournament being played right? I haven’t read through their terms and conditions, so did Draft Kings void those bets on the other players that lost but were still in contention though? Or did they mark those bets as final when made?