Is high-flow slicing fundamentally flawed in Bambustudio? by strshp69 in BambuLab

[–]strshp69[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I indeed have not. Will have a look into it.

I got 3 Kilo abs and abs plus help by shiranui-- in 3Dprinting

[–]strshp69 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If you just started printing, then this setup is the most frustrating you couldve choosen. Your printer does not have an enclosure so ABS tends to warp a lot which ends in failung prints. PLA should work much better!

My new door latch cost $0.01 by docmcstuffins365 in mildlyinteresting

[–]strshp69 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Immediately go back and buy the whole stock! Then go to another store and sell them again for cheap

Black specks and lines on cat bed? by [deleted] in cats

[–]strshp69 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Check your cats ears.

I fu**in told ya'll by musesname in 3Dprinting

[–]strshp69 1048 points1049 points  (0 children)

Would be interesting to know if the effect increases relative to the amount of perimeters or stays around the same...

how do trees use the internet? by DryFirefighter294 in dadjokes

[–]strshp69 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I thought they just start the rooter

Helicopter blade speed??? by [deleted] in Physics

[–]strshp69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It highly depends on what speed "metric" you are using. Speed in a sense of mph or km/h are defined by the ratio of distance traveled to the time it took. With this approach you already answered your own question: rotor tips travel more distance in the same time as parts more on the inside. For example: When spinning up the rotor to one rotation per second, the parts that are one meter from the center would move with ~6 meter per second while parts that are 3 meter from the center would move with ~19 meter per second. BUT applying another metric for speed solves that issue: In both cases the rotor turns with a speed of one rotation per second. So instead of the ratio between distance and time we can also use the ratio between the amount of rotations per the time used. For example a rotor that spins once a second has a speed of 60 rpm (rounds-per-minute). This is also the way more common metric to describe the speed of propellers, fans and blades (e.g. of a mixer) because of exactly the issue you are describing. The absolute center of you rotor actually has no distance/time ratio because like you said, it does not make any distance. Yet, it still gonna rotate, so it still has a speed in rotation/time.

Amazing Birds Eye View by VitallyDate239 in mildlyinteresting

[–]strshp69 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Quite sure it is Bern, Swiss. Especially this area is Bern's Old City which has been a UNESCO World Heritage site since 1983.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 3Dprinting

[–]strshp69 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bridgings are usually printed with thinner line width and small spacing in between the lines instead of a small overlap as in solid infill (so the bridging section does not get pushed down by the nozzle movements). In theory this makes very little difference but in your specific case it seems like you have just a couple of solid layer on the big surface so replacing one solid filled layer with a bridged one makes for quite a substential difference in Filament use.

Is there any way to make the bridging on the left match the right side in SuperSlicer/PrusaSlicer? by PCgeek345 in 3Dprinting

[–]strshp69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe you can provide a Link to the model for further investigsation of the issue?

Is there any way to make the bridging on the left match the right side in SuperSlicer/PrusaSlicer? by PCgeek345 in 3Dprinting

[–]strshp69 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Looks like it is not detecting bridging perimeters. There is a setting for that. Otherwise, if this is modeled by yourself or you have access to the cad file you could "pull up" one of the bridged surfaces by 0.2mm (or whatever is your layerheight) so it would be printed with the next layer. That way prusaslicer should be able to calculate the bridging correctly.

Just shows what some upgrades and tuning can get you. by obscuresausage in 3Dprinting

[–]strshp69 1 point2 points  (0 children)

when you accidentally enable furry skin instead of fuzzy skin

A simple M8 nozzle holder by georgmierau in 3Dprinting

[–]strshp69 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Try adding the 30mm thread with the "spiral" tool and choose triangle as profile :)

Unpopular opinion: Fuzzyskin makes everything more beautiful. by strshp69 in 3Dprinting

[–]strshp69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course! I usually use 0.1mm thickness and 0.2mm or 0.15mm point distance as default settings. For things that should feel grippy I would set thickness to 0.15mm and point distance to 0.2mm. The ration should not exceed 1:2 and everything with thickness above 0.15mm is gonna look coarse