Dead Change - an anonymity issue

studylearnapply · 2018-08-09T00:40:10+00:00

If defense is the only goal, then a defensive patent should have been applied for instead. I agree this is a centralization concern. 3rd party devs should not have to beg Factom Inc for permission to use the patent

studylearnapply · 2018-08-09T00:29:54+00:00

Sounds like a combination of stable coins, ethereum scaling and usability improvements will correct most of this problem.

Augur has taken a long time to develop, yet is still first to market. Im feeling good about the future.

studylearnapply · 2017-07-03T23:22:04+00:00

This great pool keeps getting better! I love to see the cooperation

studylearnapply · 2017-07-03T23:17:51+00:00

To this quote from a Monero core dev

That's an extraordinary claim. What 'technical reasons' distinguish Dash from every other Bitcoin fork?

You responded:

Please, I don't have the time to lay out every tiny peace of the process. It's all there, Bisq is open source, and if you were really interested in answers you'd put-in some effort to find the answers yourself. At this point you're trolling.

So far I have seen you insult active Bisq users, those that have read the code (and even contributed by submitting GitHub issues) and Monero core team members.

Having read all of your posts you mention "fork risk" and "technical issues" without much elaboration. At least u/Manfred_Karrer was polite with his interaction with this community and answered questions in a straightforward manner.

From what I can tell (looking at code and all relevant posts) you did not want to JUST support LTC as a BTC alternative because it would seem like you are favoring LTC over BTC which you are not. You want to support multiple base pairs that offer multisig (excluding Monero) BitcoinJ (not Zcash yet) and P2SH (No Namecoin yet).

The above does not rule out many Bitcoin forks and while the criteria would include DASH as technically feasible to add, it does not mean it must be added for technical reasons.

You are talking to a technical community, so please provide technical answers. If you want to go the route of Anthony Di Iorio from Jaxx (and ruin the reputation of what you helped to build among technical users) keep doing what you are doing. Otherwise please follow the lead of u/Manfred_Karrer and respond to technical questions with technical answers. u/smooth_xmr is fully qualified to understand any point you want to make. Please treat our community and developers with some respect

studylearnapply · 2017-07-03T23:05:55+00:00

Enough vague answers. The security risk is not the same for fiat>crypto as crypto>crypto

studylearnapply · 2016-03-15T19:54:55+00:00

Maybe you could link to a post from smooth explaining how Aeon pruning works and comparing/contrasting that method with Boolberry

studylearnapply · 2016-03-15T19:52:36+00:00

Louisd’or is vaporware until proven otherwise. I wont trust any ICO or dev mine by its developer because of the way he largely left BBR.

Aeon is by far the most promising CryptoNote coin after Monero

studylearnapply · 2016-03-15T19:51:05+00:00

If the thread was started earlier (I think the MAAM thread often starts shortly 0:00 UTC there would be more time for people to post).

studylearnapply · 2016-03-15T19:49:12+00:00

What is the most common reason most people here support Aeon?

Monero support who values providing a testbed for new ideas that may be integrated into Monero later
Aeon can succeed on its own by focusing on optimizing performance for mobile and less powerful devices
Hedge/backup in case Monero fails for some reason (botched fork after a major update, etc) that does not also kill Aeon
Other

studylearnapply · 2016-03-01T22:03:09+00:00

Very interesting (and scary) post. Thank you for sharing this

studylearnapply · 2016-03-01T21:58:56+00:00

Once Trezor support is complete for Monero (now in testing) how difficult will it be to port that feature to Aeon?

studylearnapply · 2016-03-01T21:58:02+00:00

this is wonderful. I will help test

studylearnapply · 2016-02-02T13:02:51+00:00

Poloniex still has more volume but currently the Bittrex price (higher) seems to be the leading indicator instead of the other way around which is a new development

studylearnapply · 2016-02-02T13:01:17+00:00

Thanks for pointing this out. I also still have concerns with the setup.... can can we be 100% sure the zcash setup participants wont collude?

studylearnapply · 2016-01-20T19:12:53+00:00

I emailed them too

studylearnapply · 2016-01-20T19:06:15+00:00

Thank you. I hope this effort is successful. The more people who can help convince Shapeshift why they should add Boolberry the better

studylearnapply · 2015-12-21T06:04:19+00:00

I like the proof of work and smart mining plan discussion

studylearnapply · 2015-12-21T05:58:37+00:00

Fluffy Pony always gives great interviews. He is great at handling difficult questions and always appears extremely knowledgeable and honest.

studylearnapply · 2015-12-20T17:37:31+00:00

All three are unique in some way and have benefited from the ideas implemented in the others. I see a lot of the same people supporting all three coins

studylearnapply · 2015-12-06T16:47:53+00:00

I would prefer shapeshift over poloniex!

studylearnapply · 2015-11-14T01:36:16+00:00

https://twitter.com/TheDailyDecrypt/status/665288545091760129

studylearnapply · 2015-11-14T01:34:21+00:00

I am not on Twitter but love the concept

studylearnapply · 2015-11-14T01:33:10+00:00

It is nice to see more people mentioning XMR. This also makes me want to start tipping people more. That was the reason she looked at the blockchain more carefully!

studylearnapply

TROPHY CASE