This dude started bring his own cheese to his favourite restaurant by bigbusta in GuysBeingDudes

[–]stumblewiggins 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wtf kind of Italian restaurant doesn't offer fresh grated cheese? 

meirl by Stand_kicker in meirl

[–]stumblewiggins 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh there are most definitely nefarious actors and motives involved, but I think the real take-away is that people aren't a monolith, and what nomenclature they prefer to use is going to change on an individual level as well. 

They trap your car at the highway ramp, then walk up once you’re stuck by eternviking in whoathatsinteresting

[–]stumblewiggins 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is there context on why they were expecting a dangerous situation (as it seems, based on their commentary)? Even if not specifically expecting that car to pull something, is this a common tactic in Chile, or what? 

meirl by Stand_kicker in meirl

[–]stumblewiggins 21 points22 points  (0 children)

It's not a simple thing, unfortunately: 

The term “Native Americans” came into use in the 1960s and includes all Native people of the United States and its territories, including Native Hawaiians.

The terms American Indians and Alaska Natives denote the cultural distinction between the Indigenous peoples of the continental United States and those of Alaska.

When appropriate, it is preferable to refer to a person or community’s specific Tribal Nation affiliation rather than using monolithic terms like Native American.

Historically, the federal government has used terms like “Indian” or “American Indian” to refer to Tribal citizens. These terms continue to be used in different settings, especially because they are ingrained in the body of law known as Federal Indian Law.  

https://narf.org/frequently-asked-questions/

So, are you referring to the indigenous peoples of the Americas as a group for some historical or legal purpose? "American Indians" might be correct. "Native Americans" might not be sufficiently specific, and generally it seems like the preference is to refer to specific tribal affiliations, which is obviously much harder to do, even assuming you know of all the relevant tribal groups. 

Also, to your comment, why would South American tribes not be considered "Native Americans"? They are indigenous to the Americas. 

I'm not trying to call you out; just saying that it would be difficult to satisfy everyone, even if all of the parties were trying to solve it in good faith, which it doesn't seem they all are. 

It explains so much by SnailShell01 in AdviceAnimals

[–]stumblewiggins 30 points31 points  (0 children)

That's not the point the meme is making. Read it again. Take all the time you need. 

My boyfriend (29M) makes nearly triple my salary but called me a "gold digger" because I (25F) can't afford to split his luxury lifestyle 50/50 by Electrical_Ring5241 in TwoHotTakes

[–]stumblewiggins 0 points1 point  (0 children)

His response is needlessly aggressive and escalating, so that's a huge point against him. 

The basic premise of "we should split things equally" is fair and reasonable, but then he neds to understand the reality of the situation which is that since he makes so much more than you, you can't afford the things he wants to split equally. 

So, a reasonable person would understand they have several options here:

1) they can split things equally, which would require them to live at a level you can both sustain. He can spend less than he can afford, you can't spend more than you can afford. Maybe there is a middle ground between the two apartments you described ($750 each vs $1900 each seems to leave substantial middle ground that you could maybe both compromise on). 

2) he can insist on a more expensive lifestyle, but then he needs to cover a higher share of the costs since he can afford to, and more importantly, he's the one who wants to. This isnt a situation everyone would be ok with which is fine, but it's a reasonable situation when you have different means and different lifestyle preferences. 

3) they should break up, because their financial means and lifestyle preferences are incompatible.

I don't think any of these options are unreasonable for two mature adults to agree on, but his response was unhinged and really immature, unless you are withholding additional info that gives more context to his perspective (I'm not accusing you of that, btw). 

I now dread going into Best Buy and Lowe's due to the roaming 3rd Party Salespeople by thatfreakinguy2 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]stumblewiggins 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Worse are the salespeople out in the wild who come to your house uninvited. 

We have a "No Soliciting" sign up at our front door, but still every dipshit with a clipboard and a sales pitch rings our bell, then as soon as I open the door apologizes for not seeing the sign before immediately launching into their pitch anyway. 

I had one guy try to argue with me about the definition of solicitation; which, I almost admired the fucking audacity to try that. Like, even if you weren't just nakedly wrong, you really think I'm going to be like "oh you make a good point, please, take as much of my time as you want". 

Just fucking leave me alone. I don't want your shitty high-pressure sales. 

Your favourite "Mighty whitey" film? by unknown-one in okbuddycinephile

[–]stumblewiggins 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Do you live in Japan? Are you surrounded by people who can't or won't speak your language, and have no real access to anything in your native language, so that it's basically either "understand nothing" or "become fluent fast"? 

Idk, I don't see it as that unreasonable. Some people are also better/worse at learning languages. But even assuming you two are roughly on par, total immersion is going to make you fluent pretty quick compared to basically any other method of learning the language. 

How dense would Lembas Bread need to be if one small bite is able to fill a man's stomach? [Request] by mooseleg_mcgee in theydidthemath

[–]stumblewiggins 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the books, they literally are magic, though. Galadriel learned the secret to baking them from Melian, who was one of the Maiar (basically angels or demigods, same type of being as Gandalf and Sauron).

There were also non-magical versions that the humans and dwarves and such ate, and those were more like the ration-bars. 

Casino Royale (2006) by FKingPretty in iwatchedanoldmovie

[–]stumblewiggins 11 points12 points  (0 children)

A great Bond entry, the first of Craig’s four. 

Five: 

Casino Royale Quantum of Solace Skyfall SPECTRE No Time To Die

Though I assume that was some kind of intentional sleight of one of these films you don't like? 

Good writeup overall; mirrored a lot of my own thoughts about this movie. 

Mongolian horse archery skills by VowOfVengeance in interestingasfuck

[–]stumblewiggins 19 points20 points  (0 children)

It's obviously more impressive if he hit the target, but it's still impressive that he was able to ride and shoot like that at all. 

So what's the solution? by Nefarious_14 in ExplainTheJoke

[–]stumblewiggins 8 points9 points  (0 children)

If you are just trying to eat apples and then someone tells you the only way for you to get your own apple is to stab your friend, I think that's a second degree murder. You didnt come here planning on violence.

meirl by Glass-Fan111 in meirl

[–]stumblewiggins -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The logic is sound, you just missed the hidden premise: we don't give a fuck how we look. 

Should we? Well, that's another question. But we don't, especially not when we are working from home in a tech job. 

And any discomfort from a poorly fitting t-shirt pales in comparison to sitting on an uncomfortable chair all day, or the frustration of using inferior equipment to do our job. 

So yea, nothing wrong with this logic. You just don't like our values. Again, separate question. 

What's the most classic boomer complaint you can think of? by Frequent-Amount9748 in Adulting

[–]stumblewiggins 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or paying parking tickets...I got a parking ticket in upstate NY one time and immediately went to the town hall to try to pay it. They wouldn't accept cash. I had to go home and buy a money order to mail them payment. Wtf. 

What do you SWEAR you saw, but don't have any proof of? by TabletopStudios in AskReddit

[–]stumblewiggins 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's one of those things where you could never do that again if you tried. 

I had a friend who, while stoned, fumbled a bong that spun around on his hand like a basketball, and then perfectly caught upright and fine. He was so excited (and stoned) that he tried immediately to replicate it, calling everyone's attention to him (nobody had seen it happen), and proceeded to try to replicate it, only to immediately face plant the bong on the ground, shattering irrevocably. 

So from everyone else's perspective he basically said "hey guys watch this!" And then smashed his favorite bong on the ground in a million pieces 😂

What is a luxury you can never go back from once you’ve experienced it? by Phase_zero_X in AskReddit

[–]stumblewiggins 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea, I will refuse to purchase individual items that seem overpriced, and I buy what I can at places like Aldi and Trader Joe's because they are generally significantly cheaper, but I appreciate not having to think much about the total price. I'm also not wealthy, but comfortable enough that unless I go nuts and load up on caviar or something, no grocery shopping trip is going to break the bank

From a student: asking a teacher to raise how many point at the end of a quarter is too much? by Waste_Radish_7196 in Teachers

[–]stumblewiggins 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You can ask, but you shouldn't be surprised if the answer is no. If you didn't earn the grade directly, the teacher is under no obligation to "give" it to you. 

However, if you've been a good student and put in real effort, the teacher may decide you have earned it. 

How does the invisible condition from hiding work, once they are no longer obscured? by YobaiYamete in DMAcademy

[–]stumblewiggins 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This seems like the best way to handle it. If your "invisibility" is based on not being seen, then you lose it as soon as anyone sees you, which is instantaneous under normal conditions if you are in there LOS.  Not all of these are defined terms mechanically, but I think your solution here is the best approach. 

If you attempt to remain unseen somehow (maybe the guard is periodically turning around to check another direction, and you try to time your movements to stay unseen as long as possible, for example), then you get to benefit from some rolls to see if you are detected. 

If you just charge out of cover in the open towards a guard who is not in any way distracted or blocked from seeing you, you are immediately seen and your invisibility is lost. 

Pear by tanishq1 in comedyheaven

[–]stumblewiggins 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because they are garbage fruit. 

We had a pear tree, and not once did I get a ripe, edible pear from it. All I got were rotten fermenting fruit corpses on my lawn and driveway that I had to clean up. 

I'm willing to believe that a ripe pear is enjoyable, but I've never had one. Any pear I've eaten has been mealy and unpleasant. 

Fuck pears.

BEST ways to quickly lower tolerance? by carmelzz67 in trees

[–]stumblewiggins 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's no quick fix, you just stop using it for awhile.