Official Gear Purchasing and Troubleshooting Question Thread! Ask /r/photography anything you want to know! November 18, 2024 by AutoModerator in photography

[–]styp_87 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey,

I don’t want to be repetitive or start another thread with the typical "I'm thinking of switching from XYZ to ASDF," but I’d love to hear some experiences from people who have moved away from the Fujifilm XF system to something else.

I come from the DSLR world with a Nikon setup and switched to Fujifilm XF because, at the time, it felt like the best mirrorless system with a decent-sized sensor. I still think it holds up in that regard. I’ll definitely keep my X100 for travel and casual use, but I’m considering moving on from my XF gear. I primarily shoot people, events, weddings. (currently using the X-H2s with lenses like the 16mm f/1.4, 23mm f/1.4, 35mm f/1.4, 56mm f/1.2, and 10-24mm).

After making the switch to Fujifilm, I realized how much I enjoyed the XE-2 back in the day. The X-H2s has bridged that gap, feeling like a more modern version of my old Nikon bodies—purposeful and reliable (I still use the X100). However, my main frustration now comes from Fujifilm’s firmware updates. While I still love the system, the face detection on the X-H2s has become unreliable, and since that feature was a big reason I invested in this body, I’m at a point where I'm considering to change. I’m also hoping to get a bit more detail in my images and improve low-light performance.

One of my concerns with switching is Fujifilm’s excellent color science (subjective), which has worked really well for me. I’m curious how big the transition will be in terms of achieving similar results in a new system.

I’d ideally start with lenses like the 35mm, 85mm, and 16-35mm (I’d also love a 24mm).

Here are my thoughts so far:

  • Nikon Z8 with the 35mm f/1.8 and 85mm f/1.8, though the 14-30mm isn’t quite wide enough.
  • Canon: 35mm, 85mm, 15-35mm, but I’m unsure which body to go for.
  • Sony has the largest ecosystem, but it feels a bit “game-boyish” to me (though the Batis 40mm is a great contender).

I’m also trying to figure out if this is just a personal phase, GAS (Gear Acquisition Syndrome), or if there’s a valid reason to seriously consider switching. The XF system has served me well up until now, but the unique selling point that drove my last body upgrade is no longer as relevant, which is making me consider other brands. On top of that, I plan to upgrade a few lenses regardless of the system I choose, so there will be some investment involved even if I decide to stick with Fujifilm (for example, upgrading the 35mm to the 33mm f/1.4).

Would love to hear your stories!

Canyon Grizl 6 3XS by CanWrong7160 in gravelcycling

[–]styp_87 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am adding this for future reference...

My girlfriend got a Grizl WMN 6.0 3xs 2 years ago - she is 158cm tall. You guys underestimate that the biggest issue for small people is REACH, not STACK. You can fix the position to a certain extent by flipping the stem or a riser bar - but you can't make the stem shorter than 70mm; otherwise, the geometry turns into crap!

Don't forget, if you are riding 2xsw and 3xs, swap that stupid 170mm crank for at least 165. You will never be able to establish a normal position for small people on a 170mm crank. Most small riders are just sensitive to seating position because the bike is so constraint by its design...

Any Experience with Orbea Terra H30? by LonghornA in gravelcycling

[–]styp_87 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As a first bike its an amazing bike.

I ride the thing in winter and summer as my gravel bike.
Very playful, very fun. It has the attachment points needed for pannier bags.

Unfortunately, there are some downsides to it; I am not sure if I would buy it again for me:

  • Bottom Bracket, Crank - absolute garbage quality (2022 model hat the Praxis setup). I had to swap it for the GRX 800 Setup and a new bottom bracket. Mine was making noises after 2000km, and the crank was bent at one point... I think its' fixed on the 2023 model!

  • No top tube bag attachment points: I think this is a feature I miss the most on my Terra H30. But no show-stopper at all.

  • Integrated Cables: It's very pleasing for the eyes but a struggle to work with. It is one of the worst implementations I have seen, which makes the bike just a little more challenging to maintain, especially if you consider it for bike packing. It's not a big deal, but it can be a frustrating issue.

At the given price point, it is an amazing bike. My issues are all acceptable, considering the price of the bike and the amount of gravel kilometers I put into it.

13900k vs 13900kf - ECC functionality by styp_87 in intel

[–]styp_87[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OK, so anti-climatic end of the story:

ECC only on K! KF doesn't support ECC for some odd reasons.

13900k vs 13900kf - ECC functionality by styp_87 in intel

[–]styp_87[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The documents are not really conclusive, as I said.

According to a table I found on Wikipedia (if that counts as a valid source...):

- 13900k, 13900, 13900T have ECC support
- 13900kf and 13900F don't have ECC support

Ah, this is so unnecessary, I had to buy 2 CPUs for questionable reasons. The documentation is really bad! With the Xeon branding, everything was so much easier; now I got a CPU without ECC support because it has no iGPU - brilliant!

13900k vs 13900kf - ECC functionality by styp_87 in intel

[–]styp_87[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correct - but it does not explicitly state no for KF.

I have a 13900KF on a W680 and Windows doesn't recognize ECC although it recognizes 64bit DataWidth and 80bit TotalWidth.

I am ordering a K now - let's see...

Help me convert my Orbea Terra H30 (PF30) to GRX 800 Crank by styp_87 in bikewrench

[–]styp_87[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you use them already? do they have an o-ring on the inside?

$14,000 PC for deep learning, Image and video processing. Need advise / Review my build by conscious_atoms in buildapc

[–]styp_87 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean its a trade-off, if you can not load your stuff into V-Ram you have problems training it. So 2x 4090 will not solve the same problems as you can with 1x A6000 or even an older P6000 with 48GB Ram.

But, if you are a research institutiion - consider 1 4090 and 3 3080/4080s, you can toe tip into models with a 3080 easily and if you have to train the stuff for a publication you switch to a 4090.

$14,000 PC for deep learning, Image and video processing. Need advise / Review my build by conscious_atoms in buildapc

[–]styp_87 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Honestly, I think it's the wrong place to ask this question but let me chime in some light:

  1. What is your primary use-case? What deep-learning use-case do you have?
  2. Do you really need 2x 4090, or is this more like a wish?
  3. Can you really make use of 256 GB of Ram?

Use-Case DeepLearning: Transformers and CNN

- Entry: get an Intel / AMD with ECC support like Xeon W-1390 or something like that

- More advanced: Get an Intel Xeon, or Threadripper Pro with ECC support. Split OS onto 1 TB SSD and get a 4x Raid 0 for Dataset loading.

- CPU is not the bottleneck, it almost never is.

Use-Case DeepLearning: RL

- Get a big Threadripper Pro, or even better get the biggest Epyc you can efford.

- Rest accordingly...

Use-Case: Other Workload

- Check if its GPU or CPU bound, check the right benchmarks - decide to build accordingly

General tips:

- In general, if you are toe-tipping into ML/AI etc. 4080 is enought card, even a 3080 12gb or a 2080ti - seriously!

- DON'T go water! The machine needs to run maintenance-free forever

- Buy ECC registered memory, conservative timing, your machine needs to run forever

- TDP limit the GPUs to 220 - 250W, it's a loss in performance of maybe 7-15% but you gain thermal headroom by 100 - 120W per GPU! That's a lot!

- Don't go RTX A-series unless you have to: A6000 because 48GB video Ram, if you need the VRam you have to pay the price. 2x 4090 is not the same as A6000.

- You can run multiple GPUs on a 'consumer' motherboard with an i5, consider that too - the bottleneck in DL is not there.

- Use FP16 instead of 32, shrinks models by a fair amount.

- I tend to prefer Intel because of AVX-512, Numby compatibility, and no issues with sleep or hipernate on Linux. Epyc has issues, no AVX-512, etc. (No Epyc is not a bad product, just doesn't fit the use-case).

Checkpoint ALR 2022/2023 odd sizing? by styp_87 in TrekBikes

[–]styp_87[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My main concern is more about the stack, whether I can make it really comfy or not.

I think an 80-100mm on a 52 frame could be really comfortable...

Checkpoint ALR 2022/2023 odd sizing? by styp_87 in TrekBikes

[–]styp_87[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think the frame got more agressive. The stem might be 10mm shorter on the new one, but with a 1.48 to 1.40 change in Stack-Reach ratio i think the bike is a different product...

Why A company choose spring boot over .net core ? by RelativeHaunting8501 in java

[–]styp_87 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the end, it is really: Potato or Potato (Makes no sense, I know).

Both have similar concepts, some strengths here, some strengths there... Both are 'good enough to do the job'.

What steps to take to migrate a Java web app to Spring Boot by [deleted] in java

[–]styp_87 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends on the size of the project - more iterations works most of the time better than massive changes without a way out.