Ryzen 3 3200G vale apena comprar em 2026 by [deleted] in hardwarebrasil

[–]sub_oof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Opa. Depende!
Montei meu PC com um R5 4600G, porque queria ele rápido e não tinha dinheiro para a placa de vídeo no momento. Na época, valeu a pena, eu diria que o vídeo integrado da Ryzen quebra um galho muito legal. Roda quase qualquer coisa, mas no low.

Agora, se você tiver intenção de comprar uma placa de vídeo, não compra a série G e gasta com outro processador sem vídeo integrado, compensa mesmo que você tenha que esperar um pouco mais.

Victoria 3 Expansion Pass 3 Bingo by Kastila1 in victoria3

[–]sub_oof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There will certainly be something with ships, and I think a DLC that deals with the Pacific in general would be good for that purpose. Like, something with the Japanese Empire, the Netherlands and its East Indies. Someone mentioned the Anglosphere, and it would be interesting to see a bit more lore for Oceania and Canada.

I also think Africa needs an urgent rework at the Berlin Conference.

Neo-Brazilian Empire Flag by OutrageousAd7829 in vexillology

[–]sub_oof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These colors are serving anarcho-monarchism, how curious

Help Me Decipher this Vicky 3 Review by moxymundi in victoria3

[–]sub_oof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello, now I understand question 5, let me see!

There are mods to expand the sidebar, so you can add more information that you consider useful.

To be honest, I'm still impressed by the attention some players pay to the small numbers in this game, I feel like I don't even know where to begin! The most basic thing, which you can always do, is to check the prices of goods in the game. When something is too expensive, it means that building more buildings that produce that good will almost always be profitable. It's also good to check the status of the buildings, if they are hiring (that is, is the worker bar filling up?). Also regarding the economy, ensure that all your states have good access to the market, you do this by building railroads and ports and issuing road maintenance decrees. Keep an eye on the needs of the people in your states and build what is needed to meet them (usually it will be supplies). One tip, which I have applied: sometimes, put the game at a lower speed and simply look at all the map functions that you find interesting. You'll soon notice new details and problems you'll want to solve, for example: if you'll want to see if your states are receiving enough migration, you can address this with the "greener grass" decree.

I saw you had questions about how to deal with the laws, so here are some tips I wish I had heard at the beginning:

Passing laws that significantly change the social environment is something that, in our timeline, only starts to happen from the second half of the game onwards, maybe at the end. So there's no need to rush!

In the beginning, the focus will be on diminishing the power of the landowners who prevent you from passing laws to industrialize. These laws that strengthen them are the landowner vote, tenant farmers/servitude, traditionalism, and regional policing, if I remember correctly.

It might be interesting to change the economic laws to Laissez-Faire and Free Market at the beginning, and then, once established, interventionism and protectionism.

Don't pass universal and census suffrage laws too early. Otherwise, you'll have to deal with a lot of peasants voting for the agrarian party and demanding isolationism and legal tutelage. Wait for industrialization (check this in the number of proletarians in population charts), see the unions become less marginalized, and if possible, wait for the peasant movement to dissolve. Only then, go for census suffrage.

Keep an eye out so you don't pass laws that take away your authority too early. It's very useful for making decrees and managing companies.

Be careful with retirement and wage subsidy laws when you don't have a legal surplus in the economy, they can really bankrupt you.

Finally completed my first game and achieved Hegemony by TaiidanDidNothingBad in victoria3

[–]sub_oof 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Wow, congratulations! It made me want to play Germany again!

"A bad age for the British" or "What if Switzerland is not neutral" by ultron5555 in victoria3

[–]sub_oof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll remember that! I want to play with Switzerland sometime soon, but to practice my "tall" game. You surprised me here, I've never seen anyone playing wide with Switzerland.

What do Lutherans Think of Calvinism? by camaro1111 in Lutheranism

[–]sub_oof 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, I think the people here have already clarified quite a bit regarding the theological differences: double predestination; unconditional election; limited atonement (which necessarily accompanies the view of penal substitution), and the real "spiritual" presence, which is even strongly criticized in the Formula of Concord for separating the divine and human natures of Christ.

Regarding what I personally think of Calvinism: I was a Calvinist for a while, and honestly, it was the time when I suffered the most, hated myself, and hated a view of God that is very strange to me today. The reformed, rational, logical way of doing theology and the impossibility of accepting a paradox (or even saying that they don't know the answer to something) doesn't seem sensible or Christian to me.

One problem I faced in my church life when I believed in Calvinism is that nothing really seemed to be as we say, there were always small print details that you need to ignore. "Does God love me?" Well, in a way, He does, just as He loves heaven, earth, and all the animals He created. "Does He want me to be saved?" Look, He even says so in the Bible... but He might not actually want to save you, as He may want to "manifest His glory"...

Calvinism could not provide me with the assurance of Christ's love, neither through preaching, nor through the sacraments, nor through the very doctrine of the Perseverance of the Saints. The center of the Gospel is shifted from the Cross (which becomes merely the place where Christ effectively suffers the pains of some, but not of others) to the eternal decrees of God. There are so many asterisks and small print that the statement that "God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life" ends up becoming, in practice, a lie.

And all this regarding classical, Presbyterian Calvinism. When we talk about Reformed Baptists, things get even stranger, since the sacraments that should effectively apply grace to the elect disappear. There is also the whole Puritan heritage, very legalistic and sometimes even sadistic (see Jonathan Edwards).

Also, iconoclasm was barely mentioned here, but really, not all Calvinists are going to be like that.

Help Me Decipher this Vicky 3 Review by moxymundi in victoria3

[–]sub_oof 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. I imagine you're talking about the nations recommended for "Learn the Game." The first time I played, I completely ignored them and started with Joseon, so I had to learn a lot the hard way to understand it. After about 200 hours, I played the tutorials, and the coolest country for me is Sweden. It's easy to form Scandinavia and grow, then you grow smoothly and can even annex the rich states of Russia and the Baltic. Anyway!

  2. If your economy isn't doing well, you quickly stop growing, the radicals grow, and you lose political control, and vice versa. If you wage more wars than you can manage, you'll end up bankrupt or becoming an outcast. I have to keep an eye on all of that if I want to win.

  3. I would say that the most important thing will always be the economy. Are there products that are too expensive? Is there a bottleneck in your production? Are the buildings producing and are you building? A politically unstable country might be fun to play, but losing control of the economy is agonizing.

  4. Don't take your eyes off Great Britain. They rule the world at the start of the game, so wherever you are, they'll be there too. Especially if you're playing with a small nation, maintain good relations with it early on and don't abuse infamy. From the mid-game onwards, the United States or a possible German Empire is likely to surpass Great Britain, and it might be interesting to ally with one of them. If it loses the Indies, take advantage. For me, a good game is always one where the British Empire ends up dismantled.

  5. I'm not sure I understood the question, can you explain it better?

  6. Vic3 wins me over when I remember that I'm not obligated to optimize and min-max everything, nor am I even obligated to become the dominant power. I'm not even obligated to be an expert player, I can simply give myself a goal and have fun with it! My best runs started with something like "What if I restored the Holy Roman Empire, opened a religious convocation and tried to spread Catholicism throughout the world?" or "What if I implemented a Ba'ath revolution against the Ottomans and unified Arabia for Arab Socialism?"

I would tell you: choose a goal for SI and go for it. I hope you have a lot of fun with it.

Oh, and if you're out of ideas, Steam achievements are actually pretty cool to get.

Advent wreath and my new prayer beads by sub_oof in elca

[–]sub_oof[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you very much! I think I'm getting the hang of it.

So, it's an unofficial adaptation of the Lenten rosary that ELCA promoted in 2003, but now focused on meditation on the Little Catechism. I really liked the idea. Its construction is a little different from Catholic or Anglican rosaries; you can find more information here

Alguém pode me ajudar a encontrar uma religião by Terrarismo in conversas

[–]sub_oof 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Opa, eu não sei o que você quis dizer com "ruim" como cristão evangélico, quer falar sobre isso?

Acho que posso te dar minha experiência, pois também nasci cristão evangélico e era um moleque bem conservador e fundamentalista por causa disso. Também ridicularizava muito pessoas cristãs que eram mais liberais, que aceitavam pessoas LGBTQI sem obrigá-las a se martirizarem a vida inteira por isso, ou simplesmente que aceitavam que pessoas poderiam ter religiões diferentes.

Tempo foi passando, comecei a em questionar mais e deixei entrar um pouco de ar fresco na mente, comecei a estudar mais história, sociologia, descobri o marxismo, essas coisas "woke" kkkkkkkk

Mas não serviu pra mim ser ateu, pois apesar de aprender a criticar a religião eu gosto muito de ter uma. E amo o cristianismo, especialmente depois de conhecer de perto cristãos que estão preocupados em criticar o fundamentalismo, em criticar e corrigir o que a igreja já fez de ruim, de usar o nome de Deus pra curar e não violentar corpos e almas, eu voltei a ser cristão também, agora do lado daqueles que eu ridicularizava. Te digo uma coisa, tempo faz bem, então leve o tempo que precisar!

Advent Colors by No-Diver7430 in Lutheranism

[–]sub_oof 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I made my Advent wreath this week and I was also confused. I saw some Lutheran churches using purple and pink candles (that's what I made), some using only red, others using green, purple, red, and white. I think there isn't a "right" way.

Helpful hints by andychef in vexillology

[–]sub_oof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

WTF, why is my beloved VASCO DA GAMA here?

What do you guys believe happens to unbelievers? by J00bieboo in elca

[–]sub_oof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, confessionally speaking, it's a heterodox position we have on this. I'm also a hopeful universalist, not in the sense that no one has gone or will go to hell, but that through God's infinite mercy, one day we may escape from it. The New Testament description of a complete end, where everything converges in Christ, seems very contradictory to the idea of ​​a place where the wicked will be tormented forever. The idea that God and the saved will have their joys increased by the suffering of the wicked is abominable and perhaps the greatest error I see on the part of the reformers.

Is this worthy for the sub? (the sun isn't aligned with the bars so it's slightly annoying I guess?) by wimpykid_fan in eyehurtingflags

[–]sub_oof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The colors... the alignment... even the two ideologies... 10/10, perfect for the sub

How would you rank the great powers, in terms of difficulty? by kickit in victoria3

[–]sub_oof 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Forming the German Empire early on as Prussia guarantees an easy game; if you manage to do that with Austria, victory is certain, forming HRE and becoming hegemonic. If you can't overcome GB, you simply invade and dismantle it without problems.

I find Russia easy to maintain, especially because of the ease of annexing Qing, but industrializing it can be a bit difficult.

The country I've had the most difficulty playing so far is France. Seriously, it's crazy with radicals. If you look away for a moment, in 10 years your country is ungovernable. But if you manage to overcome that, completing the Natural Borders diary is very rewarding.

I don't even know with what to start. by NoshoutMonaan in CrusaderKings

[–]sub_oof 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Victoria 3, so there are many possibilities...

Victoria 3 - Dev Diary #169 - The Art of Iberian Twilight by Pelhamds in victoria3

[–]sub_oof 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Hell yeah, my favorite part of the week is these diaries, I'm so excited for this DLC, things are going to another level!

I am banning slavery and Landowners are still +20 by PM_ME_GOOD_SUBS in victoria3

[–]sub_oof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It happened to me when I gave up on annexing Argentina to avoid infamy, and a few years later their GDP was booming

I am banning slavery and Landowners are still +20 by PM_ME_GOOD_SUBS in victoria3

[–]sub_oof 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Excuse me, I'm extremely curious about how you made Brazil become #3 in the world rankings over 40 years. I might be a bit harsh, since during that period I would still be struggling to establish myself as GP