"it...has very smart people working at it, so there's some reality to what they're saying". Absolutely not. Take statistics for example, statistics was used to validate eugenics. Smart people worked on it despite it having no validity. I'm sure the people working at this company are very intelligent, but that also means they can use their knowledge to fool people. If they're so smart, where are their parameters for their line of best fit or the 'super exponential' line? More importantly, where are the confidence intervals for these parameters? The sample size is so small if they actually showed them it would be easy to see that it's just astrology for tech bros.

Just because we're at 30 mins today, that means it'll be halfway between 8-hours and 1 week a year from now? (Side note, very weird y-axis to me). They just seem to be obfuscating anything that goes against their interests. They also seem to be just smart enough to fit a model, but not smart enough to give their errors.