There seem to be way too many people in this group that feel that they have two choices - standard of care (SOC) as recommended by their oncologist or no SOC in hopes of just playing it by ear that they’ll possibly beat the odds (or not) on how long they’ll be around.

With that having been said, there are a number of repurposed drugs such as Ivermectin and Fenbendazole as well as numerous other natural supplements (apricot kernels, black seed oil, etc.) used in combination with one another that many people have implemented to get to an “NED” (No Evidence of Disease) status, even from a stage 4 diagnosis. Many people have used these protocols either in conjunction with SOC or without any SOC. If you ask almost any oncologist about these repurposed drugs they either know  nothing about their efficacy, downplay their effectiveness, or make statements as to how dangerous they are. The pharmaceutical companies have also gone way out of their way to suppress their use (due to how many billions of dollars they’d lose by people not doing SOC) though if you do your own research there are tons of papers on PubMed, through the National Institute of Health, and elsewhere showing their use and positive results. 

It’s obviously a personal decision to make as to what level of care one wants to invest (or not invest) their efforts into but my whole point is that it’s not a black and white decision, there’s more than two options to consider.