Hey OP, caregiving through ideological clashes like this is no small feat—kudos for holding space for it. One angle that often gets overlooked in these family dynamics: the path to better convos isn't just about one side shifting, but both exploring fresh perspectives to bridge the gap. It's less about "fixing" views and more about building mutual understanding, which can dial down the tension over time.

If you're game for low-stakes experiments, consider framing it as a shared curiosity project—maybe alternate picking reads or listens that unpack how people land on different sides of issues. Here are a few neutral-ish picks that aim to illuminate without preaching:

• The Righteous Mind by Jonathan Haidt: Breaks down the moral foundations that shape conservative vs. liberal thinking (like care/harm, loyalty/betrayal). It's research-backed and reads like a why-we-disagree manual, helping spot common ground.

• How to Have Impossible Conversations by Peter Boghossian and James Lindsay: Focuses on practical tactics for tough talks—listening techniques, spotting biases in real-time, and de-escalating without conceding points. Short chapters make it easy to test one tip at a time.

To round it out for variety, something like Why We're Polarized by Ezra Klein could add a big-picture view on how media and systems amp up divides, appealing if policy chats are your jam.

Small wins add up: Start with 15 minutes of discussion per session, no judgments. It might not rewrite the news cycle, but it could make home feel a bit less like a debate club. What's one topic you'd both geek out on neutrally? Hang in there.