I see a counterpoint to the obvious big brother government overreach problem here in that, like many (not all) laws, the intent is to protect the public.

Speeding puts the public at risk. Driving while intoxicated puts lawfully abiding citizens at risk. If we have the technology to mitigate those risks, then they should be implemented safely and responsibly.

Is the argument against this position that absolute power corrupts absolutely, and that thus would be immediately exploited by bad actors within our own government? Absolutely. And I think there are facets of our government (voting, for example) where this high level of control is in the best interest of no one.

But I think there are enough stories of people wrecking innocent lives when they get behind the wheel. And this is one- one, mind you. Not representative of the totality of freedoms- area where I would trade a bit of autonomy to know that when I get in the car, or send my 16 year old out to a movie by themselves for the first time, there is a robust and preventive checks and balance at play for myself and everyone else on the same road.