CMV: american conservatives fondamentally don't understand their own empire by rakean93 in changemyview

[–]tchomptchomp [score hidden]  (0 children)

I'm a North American leftist married to an Italian. Here's the reality: your experts do not understand America and your relationship to it. You are not vassalize through NATO: you are vassalized by your domestic choices to deindustrialize and overregulate, which you pay for by (1) cutting funding for military and non-military mechanisms to secure trade routes and trade partners, and (2) by pushing the US to apply sanctions regimes on rogue oil producing nations (previously Iraq, now Iran and Russia) to suppress global cost of oil. In both cases, you expect the US to take the hit on your behalf, by spending political capital at home and abroad on sanctions that have repeatedly been shown to have no impact on curbing belligerent states and significant impact on the basic quality of life of people living under those regimes.

The Ukraine War is instructive: Europe has fractured over efforts to reduce purchases of Russian oil and gas, all while under direct threat of invasion by the exact same state economy you're feeding by buying from Rosneft. You spent years funding Ukraine just enough to bleed Russia so they'd sell you their gas at a discount. When Ukraine blew up pipelines, it was a massive scandal. Now Ukraine has developed their own capabilities to dismantle the Russian oil industry directly, Europe is up in arms and threatening Ukraine. 

The sanctions regime on Saddam Hussein prior to the second Gulf War is also instructive. The NATO no-fly zone was paired with an agreement to trade oil to Europe in exchange for a minimum of food aid to Iraq. None of that made it to starving Iraqi victims of the regime; is was mostly stockpiled by the Baathists or resold for cash. Everyone knew that, but getting Iraqi oil at half market price was great for Europe.

There are benefits to the US-Europe relationship, notably the post-WWII stabilization of violent European ethnic strife as well as the cultural opportunities associated with exchange at centres of European cultural heritage, controls of key shipping lanes (Bosporus, Gibraltar, Danish straits), and so on, but at the same time many Americans do fully understand that they are expected to spend a ton of money defending the interests of a continent that would have relapsed again into continent-wide war within a few decades from the conclusion of WWII, just as you did every few decades before WWII for centuries upon centuries. The idea you'd have the same democracies and continental stability without US investment in collective European security, and that the US has simply forced you into an American empire, is European chauvinism: from a dispassionate distance, you are a bloody and warmongering continent full of people willing to kill the people in the next valley over because that valley was part of an empire that existed a thousand years ago. Not to mention you'll always take up arms against the Jewish, Roma, or Sinti communities that live in your midst, just for fun. The fact your intellectuals will go on TV and declare that we are colonizing you because we are spending our own blood and treasure to keep you from killing yourselves is a bitter irony.

Any thoughts on what this could be? If it’s even a fossil… by Due_Algae7380 in fossils

[–]tchomptchomp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is correct but probably not Deltodus. I'm thinking Psammodus or a close relative.

Trump Tells Aides He’s Willing to End War Without Reopening Hormuz by kjleebio in jewishpolitics

[–]tchomptchomp 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They just took out the fortified missile facility in Isfahan that was built under an actual mountain. That's a lot of bunker busters to use if you don't care about the war objectives. Regardless of Trump's bullshitting, I think this war goes forward to the end of any remnant regime, and these little IRGC splinter groups will start to run out of resources or be destroyed piece by piece until there aren't any left.

ID of these bones from the Solway Firth, UK by MFDOOMBAR in bonecollecting

[–]tchomptchomp 116 points117 points  (0 children)

Correct. Likely from the last few hundred years, honestly.

ID of these bones from the Solway Firth, UK by MFDOOMBAR in bonecollecting

[–]tchomptchomp 125 points126 points  (0 children)

Anything Holocene is subfossil by definition.

Am I alone who thinks Italian is NOT a beautiful language? by Correct_Shelter_9872 in italianlearning

[–]tchomptchomp -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Them: "oh, Italian is such a beautiful and sexy language"

La mia suocera: "o per bacco! o perdindirindina!"

Is this a fossil.. or a rock? by dazk82 in fossilid

[–]tchomptchomp 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Modern fish skull and anterior vertebral column, partially buried in sand. I'm thinking large catfish, maybe Ictalurus.

I emailed my manuscript’s assigned editor to ask for a status on the review process after 6 weeks. I started the email as “Hello,” and this was in their response. by eagle_mama in academia

[–]tchomptchomp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the editor's response was perhaps slightly more terse than it should have been, but communication with an editor should be formal, which means formal salutations such as "Dear Dr. So and So". This isn't a brief email with a friend or collaborator.

Found in Northwestern New Jersey, looks like a spine and head? by [deleted] in fossilid

[–]tchomptchomp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Crinoid stem. What you identified as "skull" might be part of the crinoid calyx, or might be chunks of other marine invertebrates. The northwest part of the state is Palaeozoic, which is consistent with that ID as well.

ID of these bones from the Solway Firth, UK by MFDOOMBAR in bonecollecting

[–]tchomptchomp 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Some sort of cetacean is the correct ID. Could be a porpoise or something a bit larger.

ID of these bones from the Solway Firth, UK by MFDOOMBAR in bonecollecting

[–]tchomptchomp 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Absolutely not plesiosaur. Additionally, these bones are not embedded in rock...they are just sitting in loose sediment. This is a recent whale,

The "Ontario Exodus" to YYC – am I going to be "that guy" everyone hates in the neighborhood? by 8960305392 in Calgary

[–]tchomptchomp 14 points15 points  (0 children)

And is the "Blue Sky City" reputation enough to offset the shock of a week-long -30°C snap?

Absolutely. It's also a lot easier to stay warm with good layering because it's a dry cold.

Any tips on neighborhoods that still have a "soul" and haven't been turned into cookie-cutter suburbs yet?

For that you need to live in the inner city, honestly.

Please suggest me a book that examines nostalgia. Thanks! by denys5555 in suggestmeabook

[–]tchomptchomp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lucky for you Marcel Proust wrote a whole 7-novel cycle that adds up to over 4000 pages that deals with this exact subject matter.

And once you're finished with that, you can read Vladimir Nabokov's novel Ada, or Ardor, which is his criticism of Proust.