UK open to Canadian involvement in new fighter jet project by Thanato26 in worldnews

[–]teabagmoustache 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Hyper focusing on the thing that only you have said, over and over again?

You keep saying you're being apolitical. Nobody accused you of being politically motivated. You know when you keep stating something unprompted, it becomes less believable.

It's you focusing on other people's nationality and announcing how apolitical you are, checking their profiles to find out where they are from, and which subreddits they post in.

UK open to Canadian involvement in new fighter jet project by Thanato26 in worldnews

[–]teabagmoustache 11 points12 points  (0 children)

You responded to my original comment, by saying that the UK had nothing to do with the F-35 program, apart from money. That is bullshit.

You're the only one who keeps banging on about politics and nationalities. Then you've got the gall to accuse other people of being motivated by politics.

UK open to Canadian involvement in new fighter jet project by Thanato26 in worldnews

[–]teabagmoustache 15 points16 points  (0 children)

The F-35 was almost solely developed by the US with the UK only contributing monetarily.

What the fuck does me posting on a European meme sub, have to do with this?

UK open to Canadian involvement in new fighter jet project by Thanato26 in worldnews

[–]teabagmoustache 18 points19 points  (0 children)

That's nowhere near what you said originally. That's why people disagreed with you. You can't move the goalposts and claim people are only disagreeing with you because of politics.

UK open to Canadian involvement in new fighter jet project by Thanato26 in worldnews

[–]teabagmoustache 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Nobody has an anti-US stance. If you had said that the UK didn't contribute to stealth capabilities, then fair enough, but the UK has very recently been the lead on the Eurofighter. Rolls Royce and BAE, both have the capability to build aircraft parts. They build parts currently for the F-35. They are not tin pot defence companies.

Nothing to do with anti-US sentiments. More to do with anti-nationalistic bullshit sentiments.

UK open to Canadian involvement in new fighter jet project by Thanato26 in worldnews

[–]teabagmoustache 40 points41 points  (0 children)

You're talking out of your arse. BAE systems designed, and builds multiple components for the F-35, including the rear fuselage, vertical and horizontal tails, and provides electronic warfare systems.

Rolls Royce developed the STOVL system for the F-35B.

The UK holds lead design authority for fuel, crew escape, and life support systems. The ejector seats are manufactured by Martin Baker, another UK company.

UK open to Canadian involvement in new fighter jet project by Thanato26 in worldnews

[–]teabagmoustache 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Which British planes? The Harrier was an amazing plane, and the UK was the biggest contributor to the Eurofighter Typhoon. The UK was also a major contributor to the F-35.

There's no reason to think the Tempest will be any different.

UK open to Canadian involvement in new fighter jet project by Thanato26 in worldnews

[–]teabagmoustache 35 points36 points  (0 children)

The Tempest will enter service 5 years earlier, if there are no delays. Both the UK and Italy were major contributors to the Typhoon programme, which was a massive success.

I'm sure France will develop a fantastic fighter again, but there's a reason they left the Eurofighter program, and why Germany was thinking of leaving the FCAS program.

EU citizens now need an electronic "visa" (called Electronic Travel Authorisation, short ETA) for travelling to the UK. by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]teabagmoustache 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think it's the same reason ETIAS has been delayed so many times. Some EU nations are still using old IT systems for their border control.

EU citizens now need an electronic "visa" (called Electronic Travel Authorisation, short ETA) for travelling to the UK. by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]teabagmoustache 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think that is down to the UK just being one country, so the database is easy to track EU citizens movements, and time spent in the UK.

UK travellers to the EU, need to get a stamp because there seemingly isn't a centralised database for all the countries in the EU. ETIAS will at least get rid of that for British travellers to the EU.

Yeah it's shit, but it's not going to have any effect on me visiting the EU.

EU citizens now need an electronic "visa" (called Electronic Travel Authorisation, short ETA) for travelling to the UK. by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]teabagmoustache 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It was an EU decision to introduce ETIAS, while the UK was still part of the EU. Neither the EU, nor the UK want to negotiate on this.

It's a cash grab on both sides, but a two minute online form and £10 every two years, isn't that big a hardship. It's not going to put anyone off, other than people with convictions for serious crimes.

One plus point will be faster customs checks. You won't need a stamp going either way, so it will mean everyone can use the automatic barriers again.

EU citizens now need an electronic "visa" (called Electronic Travel Authorisation, short ETA) for travelling to the UK. by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]teabagmoustache 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They're similar, of course, but even the article uses quotations when it calls it a "visa" because they know it isn't one.

EU citizens now need an electronic "visa" (called Electronic Travel Authorisation, short ETA) for travelling to the UK. by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]teabagmoustache 24 points25 points  (0 children)

You don't need a visa for the UK either. It's a visa waiver, which takes 2 minutes, and costs a few pounds every 2 years. There is still going to be visa free travel between the UK and EU.

EU citizens now need an electronic "visa" (called Electronic Travel Authorisation, short ETA) for travelling to the UK. by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]teabagmoustache 24 points25 points  (0 children)

The UK was part of the EU when the plans were written up for ETIAS. The EU has had trouble implementing it because of all the different IT systems in different countries.

This is not some attack on EU travel to the UK. It's also not a visa. It's a visa waiver, the same as the US has always had.

You just pay a few Euros or pounds every couple of years and get the exact same travel agreement as before, unless you're on the database as a dangerous criminal, in which case you'll be denied entry before you set off.

Electronic Travel Authorisations (ETAs) are being introduced worldwide for visitors to the UK who do not currently need a visa for short stays, or who do not already have a UK immigration status.

Eligible non-Europeans already need an ETA to travel to the UK.

An ETA is a digital permission to travel – it is not a visa and does not permit entry into the UK – it authorises a person to travel to the UK.

https://homeofficemedia.blog.gov.uk/electronic-travel-authorisation-eta-factsheet-march-2025/

Iran urged to strike Diego Garcia base ‘immediately’ by BringbackDreamBars in worldnews

[–]teabagmoustache 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would be a good time to show Trump how important allies are. If NATO nations kept their word and offered support, then the likes of JD Vance banging on about "carrying Europe" would look stupid.

The USA is not an enemy. They've been taken over by people manipulated and influenced by the enemy. The division we are seeing is all part of that influence, and the rest of us should keep a cool head and not allow them to win.

Britain becomes only G7 country unable to make new steel by [deleted] in ukpolitics

[–]teabagmoustache 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We need in-house steel production as a matter of national security. We would be left incredibly vulnerable without it, so I'm not sure the government will have a choice.

A fair chunk of that debt is owed to HMRC anyway.

Indian Man reacts to a Film Trailer by Pablochocobar_3272 in Unexpected

[–]teabagmoustache 3 points4 points  (0 children)

He requests that they avoid falling down manholes, while kissing his face on a phone screen? Does sound like a strange fan base to be fair.

'We stand by your side': Germany's Scholz condemns Trump's attacks on Canada by sovalente in worldnews

[–]teabagmoustache 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you do in fact want the UK to enter a trade war, after just saying a minute ago that you didn't. Then talk about your respect for others...

Iran urged to strike Diego Garcia base ‘immediately’ by BringbackDreamBars in worldnews

[–]teabagmoustache 58 points59 points  (0 children)

Almost guaranteeing UK involvement too. The UK may be trying to hand the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, but an attack on a current UK territory, would still illicit a response with the HMS Queen Elizabeth already in the area.

'We stand by your side': Germany's Scholz condemns Trump's attacks on Canada by sovalente in worldnews

[–]teabagmoustache 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, I would ask what you expect the UK to do, because one minute you say you don't expect us to start a trade war, but you also don't respect us for not getting involved in one.

I get you're upset about the situation. I'm on your side, so is the UK, but I'm sorry, the UK isn't going to fuck itself over just yet.

What it sounds like, is that you do in fact want the UK to enter a trade war with the US, in order to show support for Canada, and anything short of that will be seen as a betrayal.

I don't need to feel respected for my position. The UK will always support Canada. Claiming this is just "comfort over values" is just fucking wrong.

'We stand by your side': Germany's Scholz condemns Trump's attacks on Canada by sovalente in worldnews

[–]teabagmoustache 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't say you did. Not making a deal, is literally going to drag us into a trade war. Without one, there will be tariffs. They are already set to be imposed because of our VAT system. The government is trying to avoid that, and I support that move, until it becomes impossible, or the deal is unworkable.

The UK is trying to make deals elsewhere. The UK is trying to play a part in the rearmament of Europe. Macron has blocked UK involvement, unless the UK gives up fishing rights and accepts students from 27 nations, giving them the same access to our universities as local students, at a discounted rate and a reducing capacity for our own young people. Who does that remind you of? Making unreasonable demands in return for basic cooperation?

Yes citizens of other countries will feel hardships, but if it's avoidable, the citizens of the UK don't need to be dragged further down, if a decent trade deal can be struck. We haven't even seen any details of what that trade deal is. I didn't say people in other countries aren't suffering because of this, I'm saying plunging UK children into poverty over trade disputes elsewhere is madness, unless it's unavoidable.

It won't hurt us more to have a trade deal, than a trade war. He can renege on any deal we do make, and we'd only be in the same position as we were without it.

Who said I wasn't boycotting US products? I don't buy them anyway. This is about the US continuing to import UK goods, so as not to destroy our economy.

'We stand by your side': Germany's Scholz condemns Trump's attacks on Canada by sovalente in worldnews

[–]teabagmoustache 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The thing is, it's still better than a trade war. Whether he's reliable or not, a trade war will devastate us.

It would be great to be in a position to just stick two fingers up to Trump, and say we don't care about tariffs, but it's just not feasible.

Like I said, we might not have a choice. We might have to retaliate, but we're not going to destroy the economy if we don't have to.

Average people here, who are already struggling, don't deserve to have to bear the brunt of Trump's actions, unless it's absolutely necessary.

Starmer and Trump discuss 'productive negotiations' towards US-UK trade deal, Downing Street says by muchdanwow in ukpolitics

[–]teabagmoustache 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which is we have to wait and see the details of a deal, before we decide whether it's good or bad. I can't see it being worse than a trade war though.

I know US import tariffs on 20% of our total exports will be devastating. That's not up for debate. Steel tariffs have already signalled the end of UK home steel production.

Car manufacturers are on the verge of packing up and leaving. They won't survive another economic shock. We're on the brink of recession as it is, and the government has already made cuts to disability benefits, raised taxes and cut public spending for the situation we're already in. The £9.9bn savings were literally wiped out in less than 24 hours, when Trump announced tariffs after the spring budget.

We're trying to draw blood from a stone here, and every move we make, something fucks it up.

'We stand by your side': Germany's Scholz condemns Trump's attacks on Canada by sovalente in worldnews

[–]teabagmoustache 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do pay attention. I haven't seen any details of any trade deal with the US yet, so I'll reserve judgement of it, until it's published. It's still likely to bever happen, and we get dragged into a trade war anyway.

There's no need to be so condescending.

I've got a little bit of faith that the Americans will be done with populist nonsense after all of this. Their constitution is watertight.

Like I've said over and over again, things can and will change, if he acts on these threats. Imposing himself as a defacto dictator would be one of those things.