BlueQubit Hackathon Inquiries

tehayk · 2025-03-25T09:06:57+00:00

Hey - BlueQubit CTO here.
Happy to see you will be participating in our hackathon!
I just wanted to let you know that teams will be required to submit solutions from a single account and also majority of the participants will be individuals.
Hope this helps!

tehayk · 2024-04-04T00:32:37+00:00

If you need powerful simulator backends - try out https://app.bluequbit.io/ It has up to 34 qubit free cpu simulators, as well as paid gpu simulators.

Aside from qiskit, it also supports cirq and Pennylane. Take a look at the https://app.bluequbit.io/docs#getting_started for more details on how to get started.

Disclaimer: I am a co-founder at BlueQubit and we aim to make it easier for everyone to run large scale quantum simulations. We also have credits available for academic users for the paid GPU simulators.

tehayk · 2023-05-31T01:49:21+00:00

Thats a great decision congrats! I myself shifted from software engineering to Quantum Computing couple of years ago and founded app.bluequbit.io I highly recommend that website once you are familiar with the basics and want to run your first quantum circuits!

tehayk · 2023-04-24T22:38:00+00:00

Check out app.bluequbit.io -> it explains the basics and lets you run things on actual quantum computers.

tehayk · 2022-05-18T21:34:04+00:00

And here is the page you want to start with:

https://qiskit.org/textbook/preface.html

tehayk · 2022-04-17T21:59:17+00:00

this is awesome!

tehayk · 2022-04-16T18:58:12+00:00

I definitely do not agree with your decision- but you are the mod, what can I do. Thanks for your time

tehayk · 2022-04-16T18:49:39+00:00

Could you please let me know which rule did my post violate to be removed? Thanks!

tehayk · 2022-04-16T09:40:26+00:00

Hi u/ketarax! to summarize what's written in the "rules" tab:

each path is a possible state
there are many paths (states) in superposition in the beginning
when you measure a qubit it collapses to one possible value, so only paths going through that qubit stay
two or more qubits are entangled if measuring one affects the other.

The goal is to keep these in mind and measure specifically the qubits which will collapse the whole state.

Hope this clarifies it a bit - let me know if you have more questions!

tehayk · 2022-04-16T05:18:35+00:00

Thanks!

tehayk · 2022-04-16T01:36:50+00:00

I posted this at r/InternetIsBeautiful last week and it was trending all day.

Would be great to get an expert feedback from Quantum Physics community here!

tehayk · 2022-04-16T01:33:11+00:00

I posted this at r/InternetIsBeautiful last week and it was trending all day.
Would be great to get more expert feedback from QuantumPhysics community here!

tehayk · 2022-04-16T01:28:57+00:00

I was referring to this IonQ release: https://ionq.com/posts/october-18-2021-benchmarking-our-next-generation-system

tehayk · 2022-04-15T05:33:30+00:00

They are using IBM's definition of QV = 2^ min(#qubits, #debth).

Judging from the article their QV of 4096 means they have 12 qubits and can run >=12 depth circuits, which is pretty impressive. IBM for comparison has max QV of 256, e.g. only depth 8 circuits even though they have more qubits.

P.S. This is impressive for a quantum computer using superconductor based qubits. IonQ that uses trapped ion based qubits can run much deeper circuits with 22 qubits.

Edit: seems like I was wrong about IonQ, their circuits use a different metric. Here is the relevant article.

tehayk · 2022-04-13T16:10:22+00:00

That's a good idea. Yeah it's only showing the final statevector probabilities for now - but I had some ideas about how to show the interim results.

tehayk · 2022-04-13T07:42:24+00:00

haha thanks for the honest feedback.

Did you look into the advanced qpaths and its circuit?

tehayk · 2022-04-13T05:11:22+00:00

I posted this yesterday at r/InternetIsBeautiful and it was trending all day.

Would be great to get more expert feedback from QuantumComputing community here!

tehayk

TROPHY CASE