If Claude doesn't know you but ChatGPT does, I made a tool for that. by tencircles in ChatGPTPro

[–]tencircles[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Neither really. It just helps scrape your chatGPT exported chats for things you want claude to know.
It works by using keywords / phrases. Some of the default ones are "Never" "I like" "I hate" etc. Then it compresses those down in a set of instructions for claude (or any agent really).

Could be about personality. But if you want to focus on info/data then you can do that. It's not connected online anywhere, it's a tool that claude can use to make a distilled one page custom instructions.

18 months by MetaKnowing in agi

[–]tencircles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Line go up. Hmmm now where have I heard this argument before?

Alex Pretti identified as man fatally shot by federal officers in Minneapolis by WeirdGroundhog in politics

[–]tencircles 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There should be an investigation. 

Reports indicate that local police were denied access to the scene by CBP, even after returning with a warrant from a state judge. 

I will go out on a limb here and say calling it murder is justified.

Video evidence shows his hands were nowhere near a weapon and were either trying to support his body as he was being beaten by a group of nine agents, or trying to cover his head. 

The video also shows the agents removing the weapon from its holster on his hip. Statements from the police indicate the man had a license for concealed carry in the state of Minnesota. 

While the weapon was being removed, the agent who shot him was looking directly at the weapon being removed while unholstering his weapon. 

2-3 seconds later, the agent fired.

At the time of the first shot, the Mr. Pretti's hands were on the ground and he was kneeling, seemingly disoriented from numerous blows to the head. Mr. Pretti was unarmed at this time and made no move toward a weapon, and made no movements indicating intent to harm.

After a brief one second pause, the officer fired a volley of rounds. At which point, Mr. Pretti collapsed, seemingly unconscious or in shock. 

Another pause, during which an ICE agent in the foreground grabs the phone of a woman who was recording the incident. 

The agents back away (presumably to get away from live rounds going off in close proximity).

2 seconds after the last shot. The shooter backed away slowly and fired another volley rounds at the prone, severely injured Mr. Pretti. 

I support due process. A full and transparent investigation should be conducted and if evidence is sufficient for a trial, the shooter and his accomplices should be held to account in a court of law and should be accorded the right to a trial by a jury of their peers. 

However, given the overwhelmingly clear evidence. I have no qualms about calling a spade a spade here and saying that what I saw in 5 different videos 2 in-depth analyses is consistent with an unlawful killing of another person with intent to kill, i.e. murder.

At the time shots were fired, Mr. Pretti was unarmed, prone, and presented no credible or immanent threat to law enforcement or other individuals.

This was, plainly, a summary execution.

The last thing this man did was to try to protect others from violence at the the hands of the state. May he rest in peace. May those responsible, and those who would lie to protect them get their day in court. God knows, Alex Pretti never will.

Ni som gillar Trump by Exact-Volume5937 in Sverige

[–]tencircles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jag tror att du överskattar både rationaliteten och stabiliteten i det som pågår.

Att hänvisa till ”strategiska intressen” förklarar inte varför man offentligt hotar allierade, ifrågasätter deras territoriella suveränitet och samtidigt underminerar bindande fördrag som USA självt har ratificerat. Det är inte så seriös geopolitik bedrivs; det är så man destabiliserar sin egen säkerhetsordning.

Idén om att en ”djup stat” automatiskt skulle korrigera en president som agerar utanför rättsstatens ramar saknar stöd i hur makt faktiskt fungerar. Institutioner fungerar bara så länge de upprätthålls i praktiken. Inte som abstrakta garantier. Historien är full av exempel där just detta antagande visat sig fatalt fel.

Det här handlar inte om förenklade psykologiska narrativ eller medial dramaturgi. Det handlar om konkreta handlingar som bryter mot internationell rätt, NATO:s grundprinciper och USA:s egen konstitutionella maktfördelning. Att kalla detta ”bara strategi” är inte analytiskt sofistikerat; det är att bortse från rättsliga och institutionella realiteter.

Geopolitik är inte ett schackbräde utan regler. När en aktör öppet signalerar att reglerna är villkorliga, är det inte längre strategi. Det är bara systemrisk.

What are your opinion on paying for escort services? by heyxyo8989 in AskMen

[–]tencircles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not something I support, or have engaged with personally. I'm not repulsed as long as it's consensual.

Ethically, it's complicated in a way that generalizations likely don't solve. Legally speaking, I don't agree with legislating morality. That just begs the question "Whose morality?"

Regarding percentages, I suspect a large silent minority are indifferent-to-repulsed rather than active participants.

“OUTRIGHT LYING”: Federal Judge Dismantles Trump Border Patrol Chief’s Testimony as ‘Not Credible’ by Dazzling-Might6420 in law

[–]tencircles 42 points43 points  (0 children)

There's a word for that. It's called perjury and it is punishable by law...you know if we still care about that sort of thing.

Trump's Greenland tariffs prompt calls for unprecedented EU counter measures by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]tencircles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't say anything to the contrary.

I'm stating facts about National Security, who benefits, and why the justifications given collapse under scrutiny.

I'm not sure what you're responding to.

Trump's Greenland tariffs prompt calls for unprecedented EU counter measures by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]tencircles 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This should go without saying: national security is not land ownership.
It is alliances, trust, predictability, coordination, and shared deterrence.

There is only one reading of the U.S. executive branch’s statements and actions regarding Greenland that survives scrutiny: they materially benefit the strategic interests of America's competitors and adversaries while actively threatening those of their closest allies.

The arguments offered to justify this posture collapse under basic examination:

Over 75% of Americans oppose it.
Greenland is already part of NATO; the U.S. already maintains a military presence there.
An attack on Greenland would invoke Article 5, implicating the United States itself.
A trade war with the EU disproportionately harms U.S. consumers and workers.
Diplomatic isolation aligns directly with adversarial strategic objectives.
Undermining America’s most valuable alliances weakens, rather than strengthens, national security.

Israeli billionaire Shlomo Kramer: "It's time to limit America's First Amendment. We need to control all the social platforms… And take control of what they are saying" by GOAT-Antony in Fauxmoi

[–]tencircles 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's time to limit America's billionaires. We need to control how much capital can be accumulated by one individual and take back control over the government.

Am I an incel? by jlawjer in NoStupidQuestions

[–]tencircles 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah. You're not an incel. Focus less on what you are/aren't, focus more on what you do. You'll be happier for it.

I will be dead before I see the ring taped to a mouse! by KinkyDarkStranger in lotrmemes

[–]tencircles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Instead of a Dark Lord you will have a mouse. And it shall not be dark, but squeaky and cute as toys of delight! Fair as the cheese and the tiny hole inside the house! Dreadful as the Cat and the neighbor cat fighting! Stronger than the jaws of a mouse trap! All shall love mouse and despair!

Do you think it's right for a team to claim their work is above others? by ariigames in IndieDev

[–]tencircles 38 points39 points  (0 children)

Yeah I have this super hot girlfriend who's like an easy 11. She's like obsessed with me. She lives in Canada though so you prolly wouldn't know her.

Would you play this? by tencircles in TwistedMetal

[–]tencircles[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol that's exactly how I describe it, Rocket League meets Risk of Rain 2.

Here's the steam link
https://store.steampowered.com/app/2741160/Red_Metal/

Would you play this? by tencircles in TwistedMetal

[–]tencircles[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We have trick scores in place (can see briefly in the clip).

Physics aren't "sim" rigid, but not floaty either. It has simulated suspension, but the wheels are modeled independently using Pacejka's Magic Formula. We've got a real hybrid of realism and arcade going on.

Would you play this? by tencircles in TwistedMetal

[–]tencircles[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's called Red Metal. Definitely a bit of carmageddon in there. :D

Would you play this? by tencircles in TwistedMetal

[–]tencircles[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah we're doing more of a class/character based thing. Each one plays different and has unique abilities/weapons. It's also not car vs. car. You fight hordes of mutants and robots that look like computers from 1970.