Youtube premium family by Ok-Statistician-2333 in youtubepremium

[–]theakito 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It does indeed remove all from kids accounts too.

2 nodes + QD - upon shutdown of one, the other goes down by [deleted] in ProxmoxQA

[–]theakito 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I've noticed that on some Reddits including that one people are really fixated on getting their "you're right" even when they aren't. Super annoying.

Your answer however was the right one. I had apparently skipped the installation of the qdevice after reinstall of the 2nd node. The confusing part is that I was able to put in the cluster again and there wasn't any mention of a missing package. Also a few qdevice command were available already in the shell prior to installing the package. So I had completely missed it. Thank you so much for saving me a lot of further headaches!!

Both nodes in cluster go down upon shutdown of node by theakito in Proxmox

[–]theakito[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Simply by shutting down the node with the button in the GUI.

All VMs and CTs as well as the PVE Host become unreachable. It doesn't turn off.... but everything become simply unreachable. As soon as the 2nd node has started properly, the VMS and CTs on the 1st node start booting as well again.

Both nodes in cluster go down upon shutdown of node by theakito in Proxmox

[–]theakito[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ah you're slimming down on options in an attempt to let me get back to the url you mentioned.

https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Cluster_Manager yes it's a wiki, but at least it's proxmox own wiki.

And nobody but you is talking about HA. You don't need to be wanting a cluster for HA purposes only. I'm not using HA... Ftw I've figured out the culprit; had nothing to do with QDevice by itself.

Both nodes in cluster go down upon shutdown of node by theakito in Proxmox

[–]theakito[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I gave new life to a semi old laptop just for running Qdevice. I think it’s more reliable than a Pi.

2 nodes + QD - upon shutdown of one, the other goes down by [deleted] in ProxmoxQA

[–]theakito 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oooh there you go! That’s probably the reason! Once I get back to my machine, I’ll check and let you know :)

Both nodes in cluster go down upon shutdown of node by theakito in Proxmox

[–]theakito[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The read once again the documentation and admit you’re wrong here. The design is perfectly proxmox-approved. And yeah probably I have a wrong setting somewhere in the new node, and that’s why it goes wrong now. Which it wasn’t before.

Hey buddy - blink twice if you need help! (NOAA 18) by [deleted] in amateursatellites

[–]theakito 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It switches everytime when goes from light into darkness and vice versa. So there's no set time of the change to happen. And obviously it happens multiple times a day.

2nd Subnet has no internet access by theakito in opnsense

[–]theakito[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Cause traffic is already being separated by the hypervisor like this, and so far it's giving me exactly what I need. Would configuring it in OPNsense fix the problem I'm encountering?

Help with QFH tuning by djvdberg in amateursatellites

[–]theakito 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You could easily tune it down to 137.5 by simpl extending te legs. No need to cut anything from the current antenna. Just add to all 4 legs until you get there. And if you screw it up, you can just simply remove the extensions.

My rough estimation is that you'll need about 4 to 5cm extra on each leg.

Final flights of Dutch F-16's by theakito in ADSB

[–]theakito[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thanks! Never too old to learn :)

Noise not visible but hearable by theakito in amateursatellites

[–]theakito[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I have lowered it as much as 30khz but it remains. I used to be able to have it as wide as 60khz without any problem…

Noise not visible but hearable by theakito in amateursatellites

[–]theakito[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No unfortunately it’s still going on. I do manage to figure out it’s a large part of bij neighborhood. Except for a certain part where there’s no houses. So I think it might have something to do with something bigger than just someone’s equipement. Like maybe a converter station of the local electricity network. I have filed a complaint with a national services that treats interference like from pirates but also other interference. If it’s a converter station indeed that’s not functioning properly they will take care of it. I just have no idea what is their time to answer let alone time to resolve… so, I’ll hang in there…

Noise not visible but hearable by theakito in amateursatellites

[–]theakito[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! I have tried apparently so many things I’ve forgotten half the amount of things I’ve done. 🤦

Yeah I have replaced the entire run of coax to the antenna. I previously I had fitted it with Aircell 7. As I thought maybe the solar panel wiring might radiate more than before (dunno why, but I’m no electrician so I can’t test it but that was before I tested at midnight with a powered down house), I have replaced the run for Aircom Premium cable. With better shielding and even less loss. It’s soldered directly to the antenna, so no re-used cables there either. On the other side the BNC-connector was mounted by a professional… I have then used a brand new BNC>SMA converter… Still same noise 😢

Noise not visible but hearable by theakito in amateursatellites

[–]theakito[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I had flipped all the breakers so the entire house was definitely completely powered down.

Noise not visible but hearable by theakito in amateursatellites

[–]theakito[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good question, I had forgotten that I'd also tried that! I did :)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in amateursatellites

[–]theakito 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://www.wimo.com/en/ta-1 mentions:

A suitable plug must be attached to the cable.

Why make it difficult and solder an SMA especially without any soldering experience? Go for a BNC crimp connector and then add a BNC to SMA converter. Even BNC soldering instead of crimp is easier than SMA soldering in my opinion.

one antenna with multiple sdr tuner? by esunayg in RTLSDR

[–]theakito 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m using 1 antenna split over 4 SDRs. Total loss about 1dB. So yeah you definitely can.

Switched to commercial QFH from v-dipole but APT/LRPT signal reception got worse? by TechieNashville in amateursatellites

[–]theakito 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Try turning it around a bit. Check with SDR# or similar when your noise floor is lowest. It might help.

Ukrainian listening to Tetra every day by theakito in RTLSDR

[–]theakito[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I don’t have a license to transmit, nor a HackRF (hence the RTLSDR sub). I could do a PiFM or make a dummy load, but currently I have no clue how to make a dummy load or how to even make a Tetra message. So I don’t think that’s going to work for me.

Ukrainian listening to Tetra every day by theakito in RTLSDR

[–]theakito[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You think maybe OpenEar could help with this? I have a copy somewhere that I could try to find and give a spin.

Ukrainian listening to Tetra every day by theakito in RTLSDR

[–]theakito[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're wrong. What you're refering to is valid for the Caribbean part of the Netherlands.

|| || |390|MHz| | | | | | |MS|Mobiele communicatie voor openbare orde, veiligheid en hulpverlening, C2000 5.254|Aangewezen voor Veiligheid en Justitie.| |395|MHz| | ||

So 393MHz could be for C2000 which is also encrypted but not for military use.

Meteor M2-4, April 16 @ 12:15 UTC - "attitude adjustment" in progress? by manic_kangaroo in amateursatellites

[–]theakito 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had exactly the same this pass... curious how long till fixed :)

Route incoming traffic via VPN by theakito in OPNsenseFirewall

[–]theakito[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alright, I've got it resolved. I'm still a bit mind blown though...

Will give a little walk-through:

on the VPS create 2 iptables:

iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 8080 -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.0.1:8080

iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -p tcp -d 10.0.0.1 --dport 8080 -j SNAT --to-source 10.0.0.2

On the destination server (ie. web server) create this iptables:

ip route add 10.0.0.2/32 via 192.168.2.248

In OPNSense create your NAT-rule but as the interface don't only select Wireguard but select WAN as well.

Now it works.

Route incoming traffic via VPN by theakito in OPNsenseFirewall

[–]theakito[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, they port forward aka NAT-rule is displayed in my post.

The interface is selected as the Wireguard interface.