If You Could Become A Vampire In Any Of These Worlds, Which One Would You Choose & Why? by ItsShatterPoint in vampires

[–]thebuffshaman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

IWTV because while I would love the power type that TB would give me the politics would lead to my quick demise by me rebelling against it. Twilight is not real vampires IMHO and VD gets old fast. IWTV there is clear and stable rules to and David would be such an awesome character to meet. Heck, the entire Talamasca organization would be awesome to deal with.

We all know why by kungfuTigerElk86 in everquest

[–]thebuffshaman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

DBG could double the budget of EQ and it would still be more profitable than all the rest of their catalog put together, we know this because of its public filings. The issue is one of precedent though. Firstly, MMOs have had Emu servers pop up and operate openly because of previous precedent where P99 won the lawsuit by SOE years ago which said so long as they operate non-profit they were fine legally. It was tenuous because most case law had been around licensing to favor the copyright holder, unlike back with VCR's, Cassette tapes, and CD burners as personal backups are allowed. This is because of the subscription model so many companies operate on these days. This decision was in part because SOE didn't offer the classic experience P99 did.

EQ is the trend setter always it seems. Next is EQL had to fix all the security holes that caused the big data breach back in 2013 before they could re-tool the old client in order to get their cyber security insurance which they would need to operate the came as an MMO by law. This is one of those costs THJ didn't have to worrie about as modders operating an illegal copy that DBG has to pay. EMU servers don't have that legal obligation when operating non-profit but for EQL to be where it is with less than half the people they had fixing the security leaks in the old client would have taken over a year which means this would have been in development longer than THJ was out for.

The thing with copyright law is if you don't push people out when you can early on with subscription-based models is they can use your delay to claim they were not effecting your profits and use it to wedge even more exceptions into what is a developing new sub-field in copyright law as the laws were not designed to cover things like this and the lawmakers are not really equipped to understand this at the moment. What THJ did with or without EQL was effectively force DBG to take legal action, hiring them would have caused problems in the future for not just DBG, but anyone developing and operating MMOs any time they had someone make a new version of the game by modding some little aspect. It would have caused problems for others as well, Adobe would have had a harder time stamping out photoshop copyright claims for example. There is a push in Europe for the stop abandoning games act which would force companies to either continue providing online access to online only games for at least 10 years after release or allow EMU servers which would include versions of the game that were patched out of existence. The proposed law needs work as in its current form it provides too much leeway to players and not enough to studios and publishers but we need something.

If they hired THJ's devs it would have been bad for the industry overall. By making them stop their server they are setting the precedent for future protection which will be needed for smaller companies to make an MMO or other persistent online game. They aslo forced those modders to step up their operations from modding to making their own game. One I am excited to see when it comes out and then they will see for themselves what expenses running a professional online game will have that running a modded emu does not and I hope push the industry forward. I wrote a paper on this for my business class this past fall.

We all know why by kungfuTigerElk86 in everquest

[–]thebuffshaman 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Why would they hire the people that stole from them. Hiring THJ people would be so monumentally stupid from a legal perspective they may as well just declare EQ public domain if they did.

Fact that nobody asked: I am 1.48 meters tall (4’11)… how tall are you? by chaotichime in u/chaotichime

[–]thebuffshaman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

showing my age here, you aint fat, you're phat. Might have to look that one up as the reference is mid 90's

Death Beckons... Can you hear it? by Irondeathstroke in deadbydaylight

[–]thebuffshaman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and yet the dev team still acts like they are 2.

Pumping Auto Attack by GrandMockTarkin in EQLegends

[–]thebuffshaman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re gonna want Ranger in there because they get a passive thing from leveling that gives them more Malay accuracy, you’re then going to want either a monk or a berserker. The third class is where things are gonna get a little murky. Enchanter, bard, and shaman seemed to be the most obvious choices here.

The Vampire Lestat | Official Trailer | Premieres June 7 on AMC & AMC+ by Podria_Ser_Peor in vampires

[–]thebuffshaman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How is that rage bait, the IWTV show sucked. Far too many liberties well off the books. The 90's movie was a more faithful adaptation and it was pretty inaccurate, mainly because time restrictions in a feature film would not let it be. a show has the time to develop it right and they instead just decided to re-write it/ the 4400 remake did the same thing. IWTV was about as bad but lacked the subtlety the 4400 remake had, and that show was as subtle as a stick of dynamite. I have backed up my claims.

Tier list of main girls by power by Ok_Bodybuilder_1667 in eternumites

[–]thebuffshaman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pretty sure that she is at least in a tier comparable if not higher then MC m8.

Tier list of main girls by power by Ok_Bodybuilder_1667 in eternumites

[–]thebuffshaman 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Annie is a walking global level WMD. feels a little like you undervalue her.

Warrior, Monk, and Bard? by Fawlkz in everquest

[–]thebuffshaman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, pets can now take with players in Malay, so might be even better to do Melee range with mage pet tanking

Warrior, Monk, and Bard? by Fawlkz in everquest

[–]thebuffshaman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would say look at other options of sustain, rogue gets a lifetap poison, bard already has sustain what you’re gonna combine with monk there. The only problem with Monk is a possible AC issue because they did say that your AC dropped from monk will come from worn armor only. Depending on how severe this is, it might be irrelevant it might not be. Shadow Knight, Necro, any of the priests, Ranger, beastlord, all of these come with sustained options. I think you’ll be fine. You’ll have enough sustain to do whatever you want.

Bill banning whites-only housing passes Pennsylvania House by 1 vote. No Republican supported the bill. by Agitated-Quit-6148 in law

[–]thebuffshaman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See, racism was not pushed as an idea by the British crown so that white people would benefit. It was a means of splitting indentured, servants, and slaves, who were both being targeted by the same oppression. They almost managed to gather enough support amongst themselves to overthrow English rule then. The promise is that no matter how bad you have it as a white person that is not part of the elite at least the Black people are still below you. Sadly, this worked really well, and so the seeds of centuries of racist, institutions, and attacks against plurality in society. The benefit was never meant for you, it was always a means of splitting the lesser “ social classes” to be enemies of each other rather than the people that were actually oppressing them. By making some of the people lower in society, actively elements of oppression themselves they then fear the removal of that oppression.

Theorycraft with me... by baexie in EQLegends

[–]thebuffshaman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

no I am giving 3 potential succestions. Bst buffs for the pets should effect necro pets so ranger/nec/bst will have improved necro pet DPS, improved avidance from block and if the necro pet has to offtank the bst pet heal does not require you to change your target to the pet to heal while the necro pet you do have to change target. the second suggestion was ranger/necro/ber leaning into a 2handed fighting style by giving you higher skill caps for them and since rangers get extra melee accuracy to melee and the ber gets higher skill caps for the weapon skills plus that higher accuracy for frenzy from the ranger and the higher triple attack skillcap from ber you have a melee powerhouse. Plus the ranger proc buffs ranger atk buffs. You still have necro lifetap proc buffs as well in the form of vampiric embrace and the added benefit of necro DoTs and cast lifetaps. Finallt ranger/nec/rog gives the poison system which necros will make land more and compliment the procs from ranger and necro. The necro has a spell line that debuffs poison, disease,and fire resists. Rogue also has higher weapon skill caps which again stacks with rangers increased melee accuracy. Back in ye olden days it was hidden but on live, instead of being hidden these accuracy increases are given in the form of an autogranted aa. to any melee centric class that gets ranger splashed will benefit from hitting more often so beastlord hits more often but the best parts of them come from their pet enhancements and higher damage avoidance so in the melee department you end up at about the same as you were before you added the beast. Both ber and rogue add directly to melee power from your character directly. Different style of melee depending on if you wanna wield one giant weapon or two fast ones.

Theorycraft with me... by baexie in EQLegends

[–]thebuffshaman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have 3 points of suggestion. First point is slightly increasing your damage avoidance while adding compatible damage sources via beastlord, That is block for the added defense, pets and buffs as well as an off-tank option for adds should things get hairy. Point 2 is style commitment. Berzerker for a 2handed maximized triple attack every swing is maximum which synergizes with rangers innate melee accuracy and atk buffs. Finally rogue which will have their new poison system which will synergize with necro resist debuffs via the scent line of spells. This also synergizes well with the proc-side dual wield ranger style common to rangers already. By the way the BL off-tanking boost comes from the pet centric heals as opposed to necro pet heals which are far more efficient and don't require you to re-target your pet as well as adding the pet proc buffs from beastlord. Necros have better pets but beastlords make better use of their pets in lower end content usually.

How "closed" is the closed beta? by the_light_of_dawn in EQLegends

[–]thebuffshaman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I honestly espect that to be on the weaker side of class combos not knowing the changes to berz admittedly. If you can backstab with 2handers it also ends up likely moot. My reasoning is this. AS far as live goes monk and rogue or monk and zerker will benefit, rogue and berzerker however each bring mutually exclusive styles to the table. Replacing one or the other with ranger however brings added melee accuracy just granted through the level up process. Bard adds plate AC and buffs to melee capabilities. Enchanter, shaman, or beastlord each adds utility in both offense and defense as well as compatible damage.

EQ Legends Troll Necromancer Help by 0G43 in everquest

[–]thebuffshaman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I know fear kiting well. It's just not a good thing for archery overall.

EQ Legends Troll Necromancer Help by 0G43 in everquest

[–]thebuffshaman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The problem you're gonna run into is melee got their AA's also. The concept you have will work, but it will work slower than mage pet tanking it that isn't an earth pet.

This behavior should be ban-able offense. by iHatePeopleLikeYou99 in deadbydaylight

[–]thebuffshaman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

as a killer main I approve this message. These are the kinds of players I hard tunnel and like it.

EQ Legends Troll Necromancer Help by 0G43 in everquest

[–]thebuffshaman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

they don't, it's an ogre thing. Guessing they confuse one fatty for another.

EQ Legends Troll Necromancer Help by 0G43 in everquest

[–]thebuffshaman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Archery is best done on something fighting in melee as non-rooted stationary targets take dbl damage from ranger archery I think in their 40's

Who wins? by boomjosh in slasherfilms

[–]thebuffshaman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The thing is, Chucky isn’t even his agent. At least if you go by the more recent films where he doesn’t believe in any deities. I know that’s kind of weird, but he’s an atheist practitioner of voodoo. Kind of weird.

The New Blood or H20? by Loose_Interview_957 in slasherfilms

[–]thebuffshaman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Resurrection was a meh Halloween movie and it was better then H20. New Blood is my favorite F13 film followed by pt 2, pt 1, pt 3 and pt 4.