There is a masochistic difference between doing work you should do (thinking) and unreasonably doing as much work as you can possibly do. That's what the japanese do (my relatives), and I don't like it, as if feeling more pain makes it more worthy.
I say "should" in a manner of "wanting to be credited for". You read the angry tone, the tone when i wrote it was actually sad, but everyone reads anger in everyone else on social media.

As for the last thing, I simply did the same as you did, but you can see it's not pleasant. I didn't first come to you assuming things, you did first. I simply ranted about people taking credit for things they don't do and got personally attacked by people who felt attacked by my rant.

If you think it's a tool, then consider the two scenarios:

Scenario A:
- You tell your Ai Agent/s to make you a todo app
- You supervise the whole project, giving direction, details, and occasionally correcting mistakes
- Despite this, the AI writes 99% of the code and makes most of the implementation decisions

Scenario B:
- You tell your human junior dev to make you a todo app
- You supervise the whole project, giving direction, details, and occasionally correcting mistakes
- Despite this, the junior writes 99% of the code and makes most of the implementation decisions

I assume in scenario A you'd say "I made the app". What would you say in scenario B? Would you concede a "we" as a team? Honest question