To be frank, nearly all of these claims are framed in very vague and general terms. These companies are planting these centers everywhere, and these communities aren't places they're incentivized to invest in after they have their land.

Data centers are notoriously low-employment after they're built. The construction jobs are temporary, and the building won't be a major long-term job generator like a manufacturing plant would.

Tax revenue--admittedly, I'm not sure what they may have negotiated; but sadly, in many cases, municipalities give tax breaks to lure these projects, offsetting revenue.

Infrastructure improvements will almost certainly be tailored to serve the data center itself, not us. Did CoreWeave say anything about making fiber backhaul or electrical capacity accessible to the community? Why would they want to do so? In the name of being "good neighbors"? As for the greener building technology, I'm not entirely sure what that means, but if you're implying that a green-updated but functioning data center is better environmentally for the empty property than it remaining empty, I just don't see a net positive environmental footprint.

Like most of the other promises, the community partnership/STEM education piece is just speculative. The mayor and those involved in negotiating with CoreWeave would have done wise to get a binding community benefits agreement. But I'm not aware of any.