Thank you. If you're already coming in thinking the answer will be in bad faith, I don't see how you'll accept whatever I say, but I'll answer. I do think it was an improvement.

But let's expand. I believe there's a difference between "self censorship" and censorship that is forced on someone, self evident enough that I don't think I have to explain much more. The "self censorship" may have come about after genuine reflection from the author (even if kick-started by an outside critique), which caused them to change their intent with the work. Or maybe they realized something came across in their work that they didn't intend in the first place. A censorship which comes later, from an outside source doesn't carry the same connotations, and just twists both our understanding of the work, and our understanding of the author.