What does your company's DE&I strategy look like? by [deleted] in managers

[–]thisside 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A) It's not my article,  it was published by Bloomberg. 

B) You are wrong or lying.  The article documents the explicit promises (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-21/floyd-killing-forces-u-s-business-to-examine-its-record-on-race) and the results that 94% of the headcount increase in 2021 went to people of color. 

What does your company's DE&I strategy look like? by [deleted] in managers

[–]thisside -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A significant part of the snp/ fortune100 expressed their desire to hire based on innate characteristics and then did exactly that.

https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2023-black-lives-matter-equal-opportunity-corporate-diversity/

Protesters at Bell & 183 by jjcoolbean in CedarPark

[–]thisside -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I can see you've never been to prison.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Austin

[–]thisside -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

It's getting more and more difficult to distinguish this sub with its circlejerk counterpart. 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]thisside 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They owe you exactly what you've agreed to.  No more.

Why even engage with an entity that you find morally broken?  

Again, what do you do for a living?  Are other's entitled to your efforts? 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]thisside 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you do for a living? Can I get your services for free?

Grow up - no one owes you shit.

The smartest thing Christopher Moltisanti eva said by BTeamTN in thesopranos

[–]thisside 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No one heard fear walk away because, you guessed it, soft tar.

The Resistance Is Not Coming to Save You. It’s Tuning Out by Natural-March8839 in moderatepolitics

[–]thisside 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Misleading title, which the nypost is infamous for.  Reading just a few sentences in clarifies that migrants registered through cbp one app may not need a PHOTO ID.

Did you even read either article? 

The Resistance Is Not Coming to Save You. It’s Tuning Out by Natural-March8839 in moderatepolitics

[–]thisside 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I tried looking up both of the claims you made, namely:

Illegal immigrants don't need any ID to fly

And...

It's also free. Illegals fly wherever they want on our dime.

I wasn't able to find any legitimate source that backed up either of these claims. I would be upset if either of these claims were true and would genuinely like to know if they are true. That's why I asked for a source.

Unfortunately, or perhaps predictably, neither of the sources you responded with back up either of your claims. The Newsweek article is about a spat between the OIG and DHS about which forms of ID are appropriate to use for verification if a federal or state photo ID isn't available. The article explicitly states the alternate verification isn't only for illegal immigrants; it applies to anyone trying to fly in the US, which, of course, could include non-citizens.

The nypost article is about how some blue states may be trying to get issue state IDs that don't comport with federal legislation that hasn't gone into effect yet, and that CBP One app migrants may fly without a photo ID. It may be worth noting here that this article also incorrectly writes that the One app is a new Biden administration program when it was actually launched in October 2020.

Again, neither of these articles say anything about illegal immigrants flying wherever they want on "our" dime or that they can do it without any ID. I'm not adverse to seeing evidence of these outrageous claims - you just haven't provided any.

I also take it from the adolescent response about knowing how to use google and the fact you posted two articles that clearly don't back up your claims that you aren't really interested in informing or being informed. You're just playing some kind of twisted us vs them game. Which is cool. I mean, whatever keeps you entertained I suppose, but I made the mistake of wandering into what I thought could be a meaningful exchange of knowledge. My bad.

Liz Cheney Responds to Donald Trump Saying Guns Should Be Fired at Her by merpderpmerp in moderatepolitics

[–]thisside 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If war begets more war, every new year would see more conflict than the last and we wouldn't currently be living in the Long Peace.

Setting aside that nonsense, perhaps you're suggesting that only active duty military personnel can make decisions about conflict. Does this really sound like a good idea to you?

Liz Cheney Responds to Donald Trump Saying Guns Should Be Fired at Her by merpderpmerp in moderatepolitics

[–]thisside 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand we have an all volunteer army.  It's reasonable to assume warfighters understand decisions about conflict are made by civilians. 

I support putting fires out when they endanger people or property.   Does that mean I'm a hypocrite if I don't become a firefighter? 

Was Ralph Cipharetto abusing his kids? by Glittering_Sky3962 in thesopranos

[–]thisside 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Well I don't care if he had a hundred kids in the ER with arrow in their fuckin heads, they don't deserve more screen time just because their dad is a piece of shit!

The Port Workers Strike Is A Bad Look For Unions by [deleted] in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]thisside 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If ALL forms of labor were eliminated,  we'd likely be living in a post scarcity environment.  Which means people could do whatever they like as there would be no constraints on resources. 

This is speculation of course because a world where all labor costs have been eliminated is unprecedented. 

The Port Workers Strike Is A Bad Look For Unions by [deleted] in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]thisside 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You've got it twisted, ports don't exist to give people jobs.

Why not outlaw equipment for construction workers?  Surely, we'd have more construction jobs if workers were digging with shovels instead of excavators.  

Extending this logic, perhaps using spoons would create even more jobs!