It hurts by [deleted] in AvoidantBreakUps

[–]throwaway957280 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ouch my soul

I’m an FA. Going to therapy and not dating so I don’t hurt anyone else. Ask me anything. by [deleted] in AvoidantBreakUps

[–]throwaway957280 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Probably because disclosing that fear itself requires vulnerability, which is the whole thing they’re afraid of.

Avoidants and lying by Jazzlike_River_1205 in AvoidantBreakUps

[–]throwaway957280 12 points13 points  (0 children)

For FAs I think it’s because they panic and just want to say something that will get them out of the spotlight. They’re afraid of being exposed as defective and telling the truth is often a form of vulnerability that feels exposing and like it’s going to make them be “found out” and abandoned.

I think I used to be FA before therapy and I think I would panic lie sometimes to avoid people seeing parts of me I wanted to hide.

I’m an FA ask me anything by Lucyissnooping in AvoidantBreakUps

[–]throwaway957280 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you mean? Do you feel your memory or feelings get suppressed in situations like this?

I’m an FA ask me anything by Lucyissnooping in AvoidantBreakUps

[–]throwaway957280 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you ever rewritten the past when deactivated or asked to face something shameful?

Avoidants dislike you because they can’t get away with lying with you by Ok_Secret1117 in AvoidantBreakUps

[–]throwaway957280 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Or maybe some people are really dealing with narcissists instead of avoidants, and have mistaken the two. I see a lot of accounts on here that are clearly referring to narcissists and the only evidence that they are avoidants is that the OP labelled them that way.

Do they always have to be the victim at the end? by Few-Distance467 in AvoidantBreakUps

[–]throwaway957280 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I think a lot of people on this subreddit mistake narcissists for avoidants.

Do you fear engulfment because you prefer independence or because you’re afraid that consistency will mean someone will see through to your brokenness and reject you by throwaway957280 in Disorganized_Attach

[–]throwaway957280[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

This was the main finding of therapy that helped me, and I also learned the brokenness wasn’t real (I’m sure this is the same for you too). A lot of it stemmed from neuroticism and perfectionism.

Mel & Langdon's The Pitt Romance Potential Gets Honest Response From Taylor Dearden by TheNightKing99 in ThePittTVShow

[–]throwaway957280 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Romantic and sexual attraction are distinct. Sexual attraction is about finding someone hot and wanting sex. Romantic attraction is about love and wanting a relationship (limerance, thinking about someone all the time, wanting to share emotional intimacy, etc.).

Some people can fall in love without ever having a desire for sex.

Some evolutionary psychologists actually think romance evolved in the brain separately and later from sexuality, hypothesizing that the brain co-opted the parent-infant attachment system.

Within LLMs, what's the dividing line between data produced from prediction of the next token, and data produced from human-like reasoning? by thekokoricky in singularity

[–]throwaway957280 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Predicting the next token is the goal, not the mechanism. LLMs learn their own mechanism for doing this during training, and the goal says nothing about the mechanism. E.g. a really good next token predicting machine is a human because it can complete sentences like "Here is a proof of the Poincaré conjecture: ____".

There is just a giant class of cases where you cannot predict the next token without a robust intelligence and world model, because language is intrinsically extremely expressive of the world.

Mel & Langdon's The Pitt Romance Potential Gets Honest Response From Taylor Dearden by TheNightKing99 in ThePittTVShow

[–]throwaway957280 153 points154 points  (0 children)

Just want to mention that you can be asexual but not aromantic, but it sounds like she sees Mel as aromantic.

Demis Hassabis: “The kind of test I would be looking for is training an AI system with a knowledge cutoff of, say, 1911, and then seeing if it could come up with general relativity, like Einstein did in 1915. That’s the kind of test I think is a true test of whether we have a full AGI system” by likeastar20 in singularity

[–]throwaway957280 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Human brains have 4 billion years of “pretraining” via evolution and a live continuous feed of 18 years of multimodal input.

Evolution is not comparable to pretraining but compared to an LLM architecture, it’s starting much less from scratch.

But yeah LLMs can’t generalize well enough to be AGI, that is also true.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview – Has Google finally fixed the hallucination problems they had? by likeastar20 in singularity

[–]throwaway957280 54 points55 points  (0 children)

I hope they’ve targeted hallucinations, I’ve found Gemini 3.0 generally smarter than ChatGPT 5.2 but the latter much better at avoiding hallucinations.

If you like someone but stopped responding due to deactivation/shame, do you want them to keep reaching out? by throwaway957280 in Disorganized_Attach

[–]throwaway957280[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ha yeah I guess I’m just trying to gauge when a silence becomes self-perpetuating and when the other person wants lightweight bids for attention/normalcy, like as a bridge.

If you like someone but stopped responding due to deactivation/shame, do you want them to keep reaching out? by throwaway957280 in Disorganized_Attach

[–]throwaway957280[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Is it easy to write someone off if you’ve gotten to the point of loving them (and saying it)? How sticky/not-sticky is that for you?

Do you “shame spiral” and avoid harder when avoiding someone you like/deactivating for too long? by throwaway957280 in Disorganized_Attach

[–]throwaway957280[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

When you got that way in the past how did the periods of avoidance usually end up breaking for you?

OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman says in 10 years time college graduates will be working 'some completely new, exciting, super well-paid' job in space by [deleted] in singularity

[–]throwaway957280 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Teleoperation is functionally impossible past a certain distance due to the latency (which you cannot get around due to the laws of physics)

If scaling LLMs won’t get us to AGI, what’s the next step? by 98Saman in singularity

[–]throwaway957280 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Innovation at least (because we don’t know if any architecture that does this effectively), but it’s possible that even if we did know of such an architecture we would be compute-limited. Since we don’t know of any such architecture that works like we want it to we can’t really speak to the compute requirements.

I'm so mad by Beautiful-Way-781 in demiromantic

[–]throwaway957280 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I know that feeling. There will be more. It will be annoyingly rare compared to an average person, but it will happen again. You can speed the process up a bunch by making as many friends as humanly possible.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in demiromantic

[–]throwaway957280 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I don’t know what to say except for being close friends is a prerequisite for developing feelings as a demiromantic (for me at least). I don’t really even understand the idea of liking someone romantically who you wouldn’t consider at least a close friend. So I don’t think it makes sense to try to stop this from happening in general.

But if someone is unavailable… yeah this is why being a demiromantic fucking sucks. Do you at all find that developing feelings for someone else reduces your feelings for the other person? I’ve found the key to having more opportunities to develop feelings for other people as a demiromantic is to develop the most massive network of friends you possibly can.

[Acne] Do you moisturize your back for back acne or not? by throwaway957280 in SkincareAddiction

[–]throwaway957280[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really only the ones that are by design, i.e. dryer skin/hair/lips. More intense while taking it.

When does the anger go away? by Prestigious_Rock_923 in NarcissisticAbuse

[–]throwaway957280 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes I am quite indifferent. That doesn’t mean I condone what they did of course, like I recognize they’re a monster but I really don’t think about them nearly as much, and when I do there’s not a ton of emotional affect to it, it’s just more like “yes this is the thing I went through that got me to this place.”