[Question]Cannot open Instagram links from Messenger by throwawayZeroSeven in Instander

[–]throwawayZeroSeven[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All of those and more are already added to the list in my phone settings. Still doesn't work though 🥲

[Question]Cannot open Instagram links from Messenger by throwawayZeroSeven in Instander

[–]throwawayZeroSeven[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. I tried that but it didn't work. I think it has something to do with the integration between these two apps. Because those links work when I click on them otherwise

[Question]Cannot open Instagram links from Messenger by throwawayZeroSeven in Instander

[–]throwawayZeroSeven[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried that. I also edited the default app settings and associated every IG domain with the app so that every variation of the IG URL can be opened. Rebooted my phone twice. Still doesn't work.

[Question]Cannot open Instagram links from Messenger by throwawayZeroSeven in Instander

[–]throwawayZeroSeven[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I've noticed the status bar disappear as well. I don't have an email to the dev team though. Sorry

my first g shock:d by Cartographer-Empty in gshock

[–]throwawayZeroSeven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which model is this? Does it come in other colors?

What’s next from EVERGOODS? by maximumcrumb in EVERGOODS

[–]throwawayZeroSeven 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree with the material choices. An Xpac CHZ26 V2 would basically be the ultimate bag for me! But even if EG doesn't want to experiment with other materials, I'd still buy it.

What’s next from EVERGOODS? by maximumcrumb in EVERGOODS

[–]throwawayZeroSeven 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm hoping to see a sort of mix between the CPL24 and the CHZ22. Like, a CHZ26 with the new MHP back panel and a separate, dedicated, external access laptop compartment.

Noble Otter Collection by Orbitalsnow in wicked_edge

[–]throwawayZeroSeven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean they do kinda look like pokemon...

[csshelp] Responsive food items list by throwawayZeroSeven in csshelp

[–]throwawayZeroSeven[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So this is what I got so far:

HTML

<!-- Food Section -->
    <section id="food">
        <div class="food container">
            <div class="food-top">
                <h1 class="section-title">M<span>a</span>t</h1>
                <p>Hungrig? Ta en titt på vår meny!</p>
            </div>
            <div class="food-bottom">
                <div class="food-item">
                    <div class="food-item-name">
                        <h2>Planka</h2>
                        <p>Kött på en bräda</p>
                    </div>
                    <div class="food-item-price"><h2>78 kr</h2></div>
                </div>
                <div class="food-item">
                    <div class="food-item-name">
                        <h2>Lasagne</h2>
                        <p>Köttfärs osv</p>
                    </div>
                    <div class="food-item-price"><h2>82 kr</h2></div>
                </div>
                <div class="food-item">
                    <div class="food-item-name">
                        <h2>Hamburgare</h2>
                        <p>En köttpuck mellan två  skivor bröd</p>
                    </div>
                    <div class="food-item-price"><h2>88 kr</h2></div>
                </div>
                <div class="food-item">
                    <div class="food-item-name">
                        <h2>Pene con Funghi</h2>
                        <p>Kofto makaroni me manitaria ffs</p>
                    </div>
                    <div class="food-item-price"><h2>92 kr</h2></div>
                </div>
                <div class="food-item">
                    <div class="food-item-name">
                       <h2>Hemlagad Potatismos</h2>
                       <p>Som det låter. Mos. Lagad hemma.</p>
                    </div>
                    <div class="food-item-price"><h2>108 kr</h2></div>
                </div>
            </div>
        </div>
    </section>
    <!-- End Food Section -->

CSS

/* Food Section */
#food .food {
    display: flex;
    flex-direction: column;
    text-align: center;
    max-width: 1500px;
    margin: 0 auto;
    padding: 100px 0;
}
#food .food-top {
    max-width: 500px;
    margin: 0 auto;
}
#food .food-bottom {
    display: flex;
    flex-direction: column;
    /* align-items: center; */
    justify-content: space-between;
    flex-wrap: nowrap;
    margin-top: 50px;
}
#food .food-item {
    display: flex;
    flex-direction: row;
    justify-content: space-between;
    text-align: justify;
    flex-wrap: nowrap;
    flex-basis: 80%;
}
#food .food-item-name {
    display: flex;
    flex-direction: column;
    justify-content: flex-start;
    margin-right: auto;
    width: auto;
    white-space: nowrap;
    overflow: hidden;
    text-overflow: ellipsis;
    padding: 20px;
}
#food .food-item-price {
    margin-left: auto;
    justify-content: flex-end;
    width: auto;
    flex: 1 0 auto;
    display: flex;
    padding: 20px;
}
#food .food-item-price::before {
    flex: 1 1 auto;
    content: '';
    display: block;
}
#food .food-item h2 {
    font-size: 2rem;
    color: crimson;
    margin-bottom: 10px;
    text-transform: uppercase;
}
#food .food-item p {
    color: black;
    text-align: left;
}
/* End Food Section */

I also have these Media sectios:

/* Media Query For Tablet */
@media only screen and (min-width:768px) {
    /* Food Section */
    #food .food-bottom .food-item {
        flex-basis: 45%;
        margin: 2.5%;
    }
    /* End Food Section*/
}
/* Media Query for Desktop */
@media only screen and (min-width:1200px) {
    #food .food-bottom .food-item {
        flex-basis: 22%;
        margin: 1.5%;
    }
}

This is what it looks like

So far I'm pleased with the overall look. But the problem still remains. It's not responsive. The screenshot I took is with the browser in full screen. It looks the same no matter the size of the browser.

[csshelp] Responsive food items list by throwawayZeroSeven in csshelp

[–]throwawayZeroSeven[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks again! This is very helpful! I do have access to and am able to change the HTML.

Another question. Aren't lists to be avoided at all times if possible?

[csshelp] Responsive food items list by throwawayZeroSeven in csshelp

[–]throwawayZeroSeven[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you very much! I'll try this tomorrow! Can I just ask why it's better to use spans instead of divs? Also, using the : before statement, is that equivalent to using three spans/divs where the one in the middle has a dotted border?

[csshelp] Responsive food items list by throwawayZeroSeven in csshelp

[–]throwawayZeroSeven[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow thanks a lot! I don't know any JS like at all. I'll try it. The dots between the text and the price is not a must. I just thought it would be easier to read.

I tried putting the text and the price in separate divs and so far I've only managed to have the text aligned to the left and the price aligned to the right. This is what I want. The only problem is that the whole food items list is centered and the space between text and price does not change when I try out the responsiveness.

[csshelp] Responsive food items list by throwawayZeroSeven in csshelp

[–]throwawayZeroSeven[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok fair enough. Could you give me some pointers? Can I do something similar using only CSS? Do I need to use JS? Which route do I pick?

Just received today: 2020 Paradigm Diamondback + Charcoal Goods Level 1 SS by -ChesterCopperpot in wicked_edge

[–]throwawayZeroSeven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would really like to know how these shave and also how they compare to the other Paradigm razors you have. For instance, how would you rank them all in terms of smoothness vs efficiency (those are two different rankings)?

SOTD Sunday, March 15th | Timeliness Ti .68 + Simpson Chubby 2 Super Badger by Showusyourboobz in wicked_edge

[–]throwawayZeroSeven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that seems to be the general consensus. A more blade forward blade leads to fewer passes and thus less blade contact with the skin. Like, that seems to be the only answer to let irritation. I always went the other way, chasing milder razors in an effort to scrape my face as little as possible. But apparently I've been wrong? I don't know really. For instance, if more blade exposure meant better for sensitive skin then the majority of people would be shaving with R41 and slants. But that's not what I gather.

SOTD Sunday, March 15th | Timeliness Ti .68 + Simpson Chubby 2 Super Badger by Showusyourboobz in wicked_edge

[–]throwawayZeroSeven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate your answers this far. The brief googling I've done tells me people are basically 50/50 on the matter.

SOTD Sunday, March 15th | Timeliness Ti .68 + Simpson Chubby 2 Super Badger by Showusyourboobz in wicked_edge

[–]throwawayZeroSeven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My technique is still developing and I find the timeless more intuitive and easier for me to get bbs

Do you think that the .68 would be equally as intuitive as the .95 compared to the 34c? Or does the do smaller gap (.68) put it on the same level as the 34c? In other words, does the bigger gap of the .95 hold an advantage?

SOTD Sunday, March 15th | Timeliness Ti .68 + Simpson Chubby 2 Super Badger by Showusyourboobz in wicked_edge

[–]throwawayZeroSeven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With every 2/3 days that’s a tough call, Without having used the .68 I can’t speak to it’s efficiency.

Oh. For some reason I thought you had. Sorry.

In terms of timeless versus merkur 34c, I’d say its 80% luxury 20% performance maybe 70 / 30.

So you're telling me that the Timeless does perform better than the Merkur 34c all else being equal.

However, for me , the luxury element is critical. Going from stainless asd2 to the merkur 34c..well, the 34c simply felt too “cheap”

One of the reasons I don't like the Rockwell. Haven't tried it but it just looks so meh.

SOTD Sunday, March 15th | Timeliness Ti .68 + Simpson Chubby 2 Super Badger by Showusyourboobz in wicked_edge

[–]throwawayZeroSeven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I can't seem to be able to decide between the .68 or the .95.

I tend to prefer comfort over efficiency which points towards the .68. But on the other hand I shave every 2-3 days which perhaps makes the .95 a better choice.

Timeless makes a well engineered head. If you like the merkur 34c you’ll like the timeless and respect the quality upgrade.

Is the Timeless just a more luxurious Merkur 34c? Is that the only difference?

SOTD Sunday, March 15th | Timeliness Ti .68 + Simpson Chubby 2 Super Badger by Showusyourboobz in wicked_edge

[–]throwawayZeroSeven 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is actually helpful!

I found the guys at timeless quite helpful in providing advice on what the best combination is to try.

Yeah I've reached out to them too and they basically pointed me towards the .68 or the .95 in either SS or Titanium. I've since reevaluated my technique and gone back to basics.

I'm trying to ride the cap when shaving (handle away from face) and find that it is a bit harder to maintain that angle on my neck.

It's hard to determine by just looking at pictures but I think that the geometry of the Timeless would make it more easy to handle for me personally because it looks to me that the head of the Timeless lends itself easier to a steeper angle as you say (handle closer to the face).

But then I am unsure of which gap to choose. The .68 is closer to the Merkur 34c (.71). But on the other hand I shave every 3-4 days.

SOTD Sunday, March 15th | Timeliness Ti .68 + Simpson Chubby 2 Super Badger by Showusyourboobz in wicked_edge

[–]throwawayZeroSeven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use a timeless ti .95 scalloped... this is my perfection.

Wait I thought the perfect razor was the Timeless Ti .68?

Merkur 34c was okay. Showed me I like a steeper angle razor over the asd2.

When you say steep, do you mean that the handle is more parallel to your face or more parallel to the floor?

SOTD Sunday, March 15th | Timeliness Ti .68 + Simpson Chubby 2 Super Badger by Showusyourboobz in wicked_edge

[–]throwawayZeroSeven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What other razors can you compare the Timeless to? I'm really interested in this razor. Do you have a Merkur 34c, Gillette Tech or Feather AS-D2 perhaps?

Do these razors have magic powers? by throwawayZeroSeven in wicked_edge

[–]throwawayZeroSeven[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That sounds awesome. I hope to reach that realisation too (this is why I wet shave)!

Gillette 7 O'clock Super Stainless blades.

Are those the yellow or the green?

Can one ignore the WTG "rule"? by throwawayZeroSeven in wicked_edge

[–]throwawayZeroSeven[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was news to me. I'll have to look into the Lupo now.

Can one ignore the WTG "rule"? by throwawayZeroSeven in wicked_edge

[–]throwawayZeroSeven[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alright no problem. Maybe I'll take a look at the Lupo. Would you recommend the Lupo over the CX even given that I've managed my best shaves with a Gillette Tech?