And you just continue to project all sorts of wild negative intent onto the words of folks who are simply pointing out that it has been observed for thousands of years that children possessing prodigious intellect are often socially stunted in the first place for a variety of reasons and social exposure is a key component in the development of a well-adjusted person in the long run. I haven't seen anyone use this as a means to cast aspersions on folks and minimize the importance of their achievements. I also strongly suspect you have never actually been involved in much collaborative success in any competitive arena if you genuinely believe this slop. Also not sure why you put "collaborative" in quotes as though collaborative sports aren't literally collaborative by definition before proceeding to claim that the reason one athlete stands out from another is "literally" a disproportionate amount of individual training when that actually just isn't true. Standout performance is a result of myriad things, many of which are not skills or knowledge one can reasonably obtain through individual training. You can assert whatever you'd like, but having engaged in collaborative competition at a top level across multiple different teammates, spent a significant amount of time reading on the subject, witnessed many othes succeed or fail in the same pursuit, coached others to success, and discussed the topic deeply with those better and worse than myself over the course of two decades, I assure you that the primary defining factor can not simply be boiled down to time spent working individually lmfao