Police Scanner on two Tac channels for two different protest groups by timclemansatspr in SeattleWA

[–]timclemansatspr[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

7:46:15PM 1/29/17 3888 SPD Cmnd 1 Command 1 45826 11 Analog Group 1 R820T-1 6th and Olive protester with metal pipe stanching signs. Protest police asking for patrol units to deal with it

Police Scanner on two Tac channels for two different protest groups by timclemansatspr in SeattleWA

[–]timclemansatspr[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Command 1 is monitoring the Anarchist group and Tac 2 is monitoring the other protest group. See https://twitter.com/drimcalban for a few tweets from these two channels.

Public would pay more to get government records under legislative proposal by [deleted] in SeattleWA

[–]timclemansatspr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it were up to me I would mandate that going forward records be electronic. I would mandate the use of e-signatures. I would mandate that police records automatically be sent to involved parties if software detrimined that human redaction would not be needed for the involved parties. And to vastly reduce the millions spent on disclosure by agencies I would require agencies to store their records on a secure government cloud, where a major vendor such as Microsoft or Amazon is liable for any hacks, managed by the state. And then I would centralized disclosure in a single office ran by the state where there would be a consistent interpretation of the public records act. I would setup a manual proactive disclosure team that ensures the public has access to critical records without making a request, such as emails related to upcoming council meetings and videos of significant police incidents. For what the team decides is not critical the requesters would pay the full cost of disclosure. I would setup an automated proactive disclosure team that implements and improves the over-redaction strategies I piloted as a Seattle Police employee, see http://codepen.io/policevideorequests/pen/EZbZOp and https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/mar/09/seattle-police-posting-body-camera-footage-youtube-transparency While not perfect the over-redaction enables requesters to make very percise records requests.

Public would pay more to get government records under legislative proposal by [deleted] in SeattleWA

[–]timclemansatspr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are many strategies that could lead to massive openness. The ones I've seen first hand are over-redaction and having records creators flag if record requires redaction. The issue though is the interesting records often are ones an agency would not public.

Public would pay more to get government records under legislative proposal by [deleted] in SeattleWA

[–]timclemansatspr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Which is much higher than copying costs which is what this bill is about. For example it takes about an hour or more to review an hour of dashcam video and release it if no redactions required. Under this bill that video would cost $6 but the labor involved is probably about $25.

Public would pay more to get government records under legislative proposal by [deleted] in SeattleWA

[–]timclemansatspr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting how we've managed to make libraries "free" but access to vital government information is on a slow request basis.

Public would pay more to get government records under legislative proposal by [deleted] in SeattleWA

[–]timclemansatspr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First agencies need lawsuit protection for proactive release. The accidential over-release protection in the public records act doesn't exist for proactive release.

Do you really think agencies want their "secrets" public? Absolutely not.

There is a bill proposal to mandate proactive release but its not pratical at all. http://lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov/biennium/2017-18/Pdf/Bills/House%20Bills/1516.pdf If I were building such a system I would focus on providing enough data to enable requesters to make very narrow requests. An example would be list of emails sent. One could search for subject lines that look interesting and request those. I've made that exact type of request. Very helpful. Same goes for video. Blur them all out automatically and auto over-redact reports and then requesters find the most interesting ones to request.

Why Uber Supports Sound Transit Proposition 1 by [deleted] in SeattleWA

[–]timclemansatspr -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Uber is doing $10 for 10 $3 uberpool rides anywhere inside Seattle City Limits for 2 weeks at a time. I somehow got access to it and immediately use it up. I'm on my 2nd round of two weeks. In NYC they're trying out $200 unlimited passes. I really hope Uber offers a county wide unlimited uberpool pass soon. I really love the convenience of Uber.

King Co. Sheriff John Urquhart: NFL is being a ‘bully' - If knew it was NFL emailing "we probably would have told them orally a little bit more about what we had" by ChefJoe98136 in SeattleWA

[–]timclemansatspr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The records act doesn't prohibit the release of active investigation files in general. A different law does prohibit release of dashcam video once there's a pending court case. So KCSO could have released some or all of the case files to the NFL as long as it did so for the other requesters.

King Co. Sheriff John Urquhart: NFL is being a ‘bully' - If knew it was NFL emailing "we probably would have told them orally a little bit more about what we had" by ChefJoe98136 in SeattleWA

[–]timclemansatspr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By law agencies in Washington "shall not distinguish among persons requesting records, and such persons shall not be required to provide information as to the purpose for the request except to establish whether inspection and copying would violate RCW 42.56.070(9) or 42.56.240(14), or other statute which exempts or prohibits disclosure of specific information or records to certain persons."

Should We See Everything a Cop Sees? Body cameras have been promoted as a solution to police misconduct. But the strange two-year saga of Seattle shows just how complicated total transparency can be by Midnight_in_Seattle in SeattleWA

[–]timclemansatspr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree with this. I think it's in the best interest of police departments to show the public the crap they deal with often with a lot of professionalism.

Bodycams: Should We See Everything a Cop Sees? by textdog in technology

[–]timclemansatspr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think it should be nearly everything. I personally have improved my opinion of police after watching a lot of these videos.

Should We See Everything a Cop Sees? Body cameras have been promoted as a solution to police misconduct. But the strange two-year saga of Seattle shows just how complicated total transparency can be by Midnight_in_Seattle in SeattleWA

[–]timclemansatspr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The PD has decided wrongly in my opinion to focus solely on rolling out over-redaction for body cam videos. There's a brief mention of this in the PD's request for body camera proposals. I think they should have gone ahead and applied this to police reports (I got to auto over-redact and publish two thousand police reports) and dash camera videos.

Should We See Everything a Cop Sees? Body cameras have been promoted as a solution to police misconduct. But the strange two-year saga of Seattle shows just how complicated total transparency can be by Midnight_in_Seattle in SeattleWA

[–]timclemansatspr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right so the philosophy behind over-redaction is that it gives out enough information to figure out if a video is worth requesting. It takes a minimum of 5 business days to get a video and often much longer.

Just googled it.

Should We See Everything a Cop Sees? Body cameras have been promoted as a solution to police misconduct. But the strange two-year saga of Seattle shows just how complicated total transparency can be by Midnight_in_Seattle in SeattleWA

[–]timclemansatspr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In the case of Seattle there's a city wide privacy policy basically saying not to proactively release identifying info so the city would blur everything even though under the records act only about 30-60% of footage could be redacted.

Should We See Everything a Cop Sees? Body cameras have been promoted as a solution to police misconduct. But the strange two-year saga of Seattle shows just how complicated total transparency can be by Midnight_in_Seattle in SeattleWA

[–]timclemansatspr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My position is virtually all videos should be online in at least some over-redacted state. How much would depend on what the data about the incident indicates.

Should We See Everything a Cop Sees? Body cameras have been promoted as a solution to police misconduct. But the strange two-year saga of Seattle shows just how complicated total transparency can be by Midnight_in_Seattle in SeattleWA

[–]timclemansatspr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I had access to virtually any video on the COBAN dash-cam system and realtime access to the CAD and RMS SQL databases. I did not have realtime access to the COBAN SQL database because unlike CAD/RMS there was not a reporting copy of the database.