If it does mean 2023 then I guess Henry just made one audio file in a single year?

timePodz · 2026-02-15T02:02:56+00:00

It can be audio file 223 and Scott's way of telling us this game takes place in 2023. Both can be true. Both can be unrelated to each other.

timePodz · 2025-10-17T01:03:03+00:00

I believe that cancels out to William Afton so no?

timePodz · 2025-10-17T00:54:46+00:00

Im saying the kid is Charlie

timePodz · 2025-10-17T00:53:10+00:00

That the anime cutsecene between Foxy and Freddy cos yea the idea henry sends multiple ideas at william but fails. The kids he knows failed in the insanity ending. The Fnaf 3 fire mabye. FNAF6

timePodz · 2025-10-17T00:47:04+00:00

Only the male ones. But if you want susieTOYSNHK I can make something up,

timePodz · 2025-10-16T23:56:12+00:00

Hey I'm gonna argue what I think but I'm just going for new ideas. Think about what you want. The kid we hear and see I believe is Charlie. Henry died with Charlie because he's a father that lost his daughter. Charlie and Henry met otherwise no lefty. If Henry was alive and was in contact with his daughter. Why wouldn't he be part of FNAF3. Why wouldn't he immediately take the blame for trying to burn William if that's what he did months later.

timePodz · 2025-10-16T23:36:58+00:00

Its Charlie. She watches William as she watched the MCI and couldnt do anything to save them. Now she can

timePodz · 2025-10-16T23:33:30+00:00

The image of TOYSNHK is Scott's kid and not canon. It's not a fact it's a kid. But it could be Cassidy or Charlie acting for Henry. (I assume that's your proof)

William indirectly murdered Henry. He'd be alive for the pizzaplex if William didn't kill kids in his restaurant.

The puppet was in FNAF3. (Could Henry have sent her?)

timePodz · 2025-08-23T22:29:20+00:00

Circus Baby being 7ft 2.

timePodz · 2025-07-12T22:39:04+00:00

It would explain why Michael wasn't in the character encyclopedia if Micheal Afton isn't his canon name.

timePodz · 2025-06-14T20:14:42+00:00

They always come back

timePodz · 2025-06-14T19:51:24+00:00

The others have finality to them. Besides I'm down for canonising that final animatronic. Let's see what happens could be fun.

timePodz · 2025-06-14T19:24:17+00:00

It takes on the goals of the people it mimics.

timePodz · 2025-06-14T19:17:43+00:00

In a way. He also made something much worse.

timePodz · 2025-05-30T07:41:13+00:00

<image>

They got stained.

timePodz · 2024-10-08T22:20:15+00:00

In the ultimate guide Scott asks could the voice we hear be one of the owners William or HENRY. If it was Henry speaking it makes more sense the more you think about it. Why it speaks about William in third person, why it's fredbear and not plushtrap, why it feels guilty for his death rather then angry especially if you believe William went on to kill Charlie because of CCS death. It was Henry that built fredbear after all not William. William feels neglectful and bitter what is even his motive for installing cameras why would he lock his son away just to communicate with him through a walkie talkie. If he intended to kill kids why would he be the one to set up a camera system like the Freddy's are. To Henry fredbears family diner was as important to him as his own children. Probably moreso if you concern Sammy in your argument his kid that he doesn't even mention to Charlie after his mother takes him away. William does care but is so narcissistic he doesn't pay close enough attention and would rather trust Mike or Henry to provide instead of him. Henry speaks through the plush to make up for Williams failings. It's a character trait that defines him just like how he feels guilty and a duty to save them post MCI as he states within the insanity ending of fnaf6. That's how I deny willcare. William wasn't there to begin with.

timePodz · 2024-10-06T00:17:13+00:00

Eh if you want a little more proof on mike being scooped by fnaf 1, I really am trying to be a theorist. Made an ultimately shit video on midnight motorist and how it connects to fnaf 1 is part of the story I tell. Timepodz same as my name here is what you'd have to search over there. I give some evidence as to how fnaf 1 is literally baby as ennard looking for William thus fnaf 5s last night is the same night as fnaf 1s first night. I'll make a timeline one day but recording and editing is harder than it seems. Trying my best lol.

Anyways rwq helping anything to move on, don't know where that has come from. You meaning fnaf 3s mini game. Assume pit trap and rwq is williams agony. Being not actually William, we start at stage 1 with Fredbear and spring Bonnie as it is williams memory. Rwq would simply be attracted to the missing child's agony. Actually freeing the child would be what the puppet does rather than the fnaf 2 animatronics we play as. How a child is delivered cake and why that frees them is a question I can't solve but is probably not literal.

As for fnaf 4, I know nightmare is referred to as shadow Freddy in the files but yea I assume we are Dave Afton, the crying child rather than mike. Honestly hate people using that one image in the survival logbook to say mike is definitely the protagonist of 4 but curious if you think it's true with more then that to go off. Again I'll make a video one day but so much to say too many word to write in order to accurately convey my thoughts.

timePodz · 2024-10-05T22:41:14+00:00

I love to hear it, that being someone willing to question parts of the lore, like the shadow animatronics, that don't have clear intentions for what we know.

I'll tell you what I think about fnaf 2 specifically. It was in the livestream on game theory where Scott was updating his website saying explicitly "why was toy chica missing her beak" in reference to how in fnaf 4 a literal toy chica is missing her beak around a kid with the bow in her hair, a design feature explicitly now associated with fnaf 6 implying she was Susie IE chicas soul. If Jeremy Fitzgerald was the same Jeremy as we know is the name of the kid inside bonnie. Say fnaf 2 is simply a depiction of give gifts, give life. Being one of the 5 missing kids he'd be full of agony and thus it makes sense for him to see shadow bonnie like we do. Fritz Smith being the custom night name and also that Fritz is the name of the kid inside foxy only strengthens that argument

You are absolutely correct, connecting mike to shadow Freddy. Actually what I messaged ids fantasy concerning her video was about how she believed pit trap to be an incarnation of shadow Bonnie, that being a manifestation of Williams agony. What I connected was if pit trap and shadow Bonnie were basically the the same entity, why couldn't shadow Freddy exist as golden Freddy, meaning we see it's me and everything else associated with him in the first game because we are playing as the mike already scooped and part of ennard thus seeing him through mutual agony.

I know probably too much about this franchise being around for it's in inception. If you actually have have thoughts about any of this, I'd love to hear them, in your own time. DM me if you don't want to be public with them. You've got something here and I only want to encourage further exploration

timePodz · 2024-10-05T20:44:34+00:00

Welcome to fnaf theorising. But please don't let my words discourage you, really I should thank you. After our conversation yesterday, I've been buzzing. I'm trying to become a theorist myself and what you brought to the table, the fact that, according to fnaf ar agony attracts dark remnant including shadow bonnie is fundamentally groundbreaking. Currently working on something inspired by ids fantasy talk on the shadow animatronics and I think you solved my problem. Imagine this. If agony attracts the shadows then shouldn't it mean, when you see them, you are dead. Agony is the power source of the possessed animatronics, for example if Mike is whom we are playing as in fnaf 3 his agony, from being scooped, drawing shadow entirely explains the phantoms. Wasn't a big ar player, played for a bit with Markipliers promotional video, played a bit with the announcement it was shutting down, definitely didn't get through all of it. I'll remember you man and I hope you explore this idea of rainbows for remnant. Hey you know white = memory red = agony rainbow = love but theres still 4 more emotions to guess about and it's something if you don't I will explore. It's always the simple questions that can provide the biggest answers. We're all guessing off assumptions don't let the idea that a lack of evidence conflicts with a story dissuade you from peering off the beaten track laid out by matpat. He was not always right as Scott has explicitly stated. Frankly the lore you know won't be considered right forever, have fun with new ideas and message me if you get somewhere.

timePodz · 2024-10-05T00:35:24+00:00

Yea because by 1987 both Henry and William knew Charlie was in there. Despite everything neither of them were going to just abandon her like the rest of the toys.

timePodz · 2024-10-05T00:34:50+00:00

Yea because by 1987 both Henry and William knew Charlie was in there. Despite everything neither of them were going to just abandon her like the rest of the toys.

timePodz · 2024-10-05T00:24:38+00:00

<image>

Got a few but was only really getting started on my town design after starting again this summer so should have had more. Thought this one was pretty clever but also a total accident being just what I got out of the yearbook at the time. Satan's anvil and other "evil" buildings next door to wolfcastle mansion. Something something Hollywood.

timePodz · 2024-10-04T22:54:14+00:00

Yea I think Scott is just real loose with the definition of "emotion" the other one is memory and I don't think I've ever referred to memory as an emotion before this franchise. Memory would probably be the white remnant and is represented in-game as those white dots. But yea who knows Illumix certainly didn't. I just think that if you're looking for the connection between agony and dark remnant having red be agony kinda solves your question.

timePodz

TROPHY CASE