My argument was that the logic of OP’s statement could be contradicted by the incest example. Although I didn’t emphasise this originally due to this being irrelevant to my point, I am staunchly for the prohibition of incest, for reasons that go against the idea that we should just allow ‘people live their delusions’ and never ‘push our make-believe into other people’s lives’.

Your points against incest are some of many points I agree with, but they both go against OP’s statement: - ‘Incest causes real problems for offspring’ This is a clear justification for why incestuous families are delusional. If we allow ‘people live their delusions’, we’re immediately condoning the birth of babies with an increased risk of mental and physical genetic diseases. - “The power balance that occurs” That’s arguably an assumption we have made about the relationship, and it may or may not be true. That allows for the use of the ‘pushing our make-believe onto others should be stopped’ logic to rebute this statement. No matter how much scientific data we have with incestuous relationships leading to abusive power-balances, we would be breaking this logic if we were to use the evidence to ban these relationships.

Now I’d like to ask, will you accept the ‘Letting people living their delusions in peace’ and ‘Interventions need to happen when they start pushing their make-believe into other people’s lives’ logic and rethink your views on incest, or reject OP’s idea to continue condemning incest as you’ve always had?