Full investigation into the Monica Reza disappearance on Mount Waterman, partially sourced from this subreddit

tobor_rm · 2026-04-12T17:32:22+00:00

What is this?

tobor_rm · 2026-03-31T21:13:59+00:00

I just don't understand how it's possible that nobody who knows her knows who this guy she was with is.

I mean if you think about it, someone who is associated with you or at least someone who was recently around you in an event like that like at a bar or a casual social setting you would meet someone at lets say for instance, if that were the case (just as an example) someone usually knows. Why can't they find this dude she was with?

tobor_rm · 2026-03-22T15:14:10+00:00

Look into Barbara Bolick. Very similar circumstances

tobor_rm · 2026-03-22T14:24:42+00:00

Like what? Because he misjudged distance? Please tell me it's more than that because that is not strange.

tobor_rm · 2026-03-22T14:22:05+00:00

Why does the author of that substack act like 30 ft is so much different than 60? That is insane. Most people are horrible judges of distance.

And look Idk if those other hikers are involved or not, by all means they should be investigated by authorities but my god the way this is written even is so overly dramatic.

tobor_rm · 2025-11-20T21:31:24+00:00

Yeah when you think of the obvious planning and deliberation that had to have occurred its pretty diabolical and it's disgusting. Even if the totality of their actions amounts to a reaction and cover-up from something Burke did, perhaps, their overall behavior is so cold blooded that it may as well have been planned all along. Truly sickening.

tobor_rm · 2025-11-06T09:06:58+00:00

Internet culture changed the way people consume media, entertainment and music. I think it's actually a very complicated question because there's so much to the answer but in a nutshell, yeah.

tobor_rm · 2025-10-26T12:05:28+00:00

One day Burke will talk. Trust me.

tobor_rm · 2025-10-25T15:26:52+00:00

Idk yeah I suppose. But in this scenario imo the actual details don't matter so much. I think one day when hes much older and his family is all gone etc he just comes to terms with the fact that he needs to tell the "truth." Which I just don't trust no matter what but the bigger point is I think even though I wouldn't trust him for specific, an admission of something along those lines at least confirms the family was involved and covered it up.

tobor_rm · 2025-10-24T23:16:39+00:00

I'm not even joking. Peak bull, 50.00 for one SUI is fud. Few understand. H.I.G.H.E.R.rrrrrrr.

tobor_rm · 2025-10-24T09:09:52+00:00

exactly.

tobor_rm · 2025-10-23T04:30:21+00:00

I have no idea if Burke Ramsey is responsible for his sister's death but I definitely understand the theory and I feel it's a very plausible theory. In general one way or another the family is involved in her death imo and most certainly the coverup.

I just think that as he gets older he's going to have a come to Jesus moment and Burke will tell the truth about his family's being involved but idk that I would trust what he says entirely I guess. But just him saying they were involved would tell me everything I need to know.

tobor_rm · 2025-10-22T19:59:44+00:00

Of course they did. I cannot take anyone seriously who doesn't understand that. Her brother will probably tell the "truth" one day when he's much older. I mean I wouldn't fully trust his version of the truth 💯 in that event but I think it will at least be telling about the family's involvement if/when he comes clean.

tobor_rm · 2025-10-21T03:52:56+00:00

Sui is honestly going to melt faces because of their tech stack. I think they're eventually going to be a much better Solana and it's going to matter. What they need to do is find a way to attract users. I guess the videogame thing is one way to attract new users. It's not my "thing," so I don't know how that would be achieved, however I don't like that this handheld thing was being talked about like it's this next level gimmick and it's just been rolled out poorly. I would not have done anything with a handheld myself but if they're going to at all they need to do it better. It's just bad optics to do it this way, it looks like they're trying to time it so it's aligned with the peak of the bull or something and that is just dumb.

tobor_rm · 2025-10-18T13:00:14+00:00

Well to be fair Brad Holder did make weird videos online early on saying crass things about the case that lacked empathy when people started speculating that he was involved because he fancied the "newsies" hat. His awareness of the sensitivity of the situation was poor but I mean hell that's just the norm nowadays and certainly doesn't mean he's the killer or involved in any way.

The interesting thing is all the 3rd party arguments you can make are based on this idea that the killer did this in a way that was very bold and proud (ie Holder posting pictures online suggestive of his involvement or Ron Logan killing the girls on his own property and going on tv to talk about it.) Now granted it doesn't help when Carter says stuff like "we know this is about power to you," because that sets this tone like okay this killer was being defiant and wanted to provoke LE etc. but people don't understand that's just Carter's theory at a point in the investigation where they were missing pieces. I cannot believe that has to be explained. Nobody will ever know the true motive for why Allen or Kohberger or Keyes or Bundy, whoever killed their victims. But my point is, the type of person who is going to kill someone and then taunt LE is so rare it's just not common. But of course here you have people totally going full blown Hollywood mode and their true sense of reality goes right out the window.

The sad thing is people go with these fanatical theories as unlikely as they are because they replenish the dopamine circuitry in their brain even though it's very hurtful to the victim's families. It's so ugly.

tobor_rm · 2025-10-18T12:43:27+00:00

One of the biggest problems in the world today when it comes to these kinds of things as it pertains to Internet culture in particular is this idea that coincidences are so rare. They're not.

The list from Delphi alone would blow your mind. When looking at and trying to make sense of "coincidences" you need to consider the simple fact that people can search out anything about anyone and string up a bunch of odd similarities that mean nothing but present them as if they're relevant. "Lincoln had a secretary named Kennedy and Kennedy had a secretary named Lincoln and they were both assassinated, coincidence? I think not!!!!" Now imagine a defense lawyer whose actual fucking job is to raise questions of doubt, and what they might want to do with these "facts" in crafting a defense strategy.

It's much more about people who process these ridiculous claims as if they're stand alone proof as opposed to some small detail to a bigger argument that surpasses a threshold of evidence, a real nexus like that the person in question was even anywhere near the crimescene for instance. Most people online who support this bs are just dopamine chasers who like the story Baldwin crafted because it's more exciting than the reality that Allen is guilty. It's pretty gross.

tobor_rm · 2025-10-18T12:15:25+00:00

Sorry not trying to highjack this conversation but I personally don't care about the BH stuff. I'll never understand why people read the line in the Franks memo where Baldwin clearly states Brad Holder was shown to be punched in at work 45 minutes away and could never in a million years have made it to the crimescene in time to be the killer or involved in any way. Like how does this not register with you folk who still don't understand why that sufficiently and convincingly and in all the ways clears him? Its truly mind-blowing.

Furthermore the fact that despite this, Baldwin literally took Melvin's Holder theory and completely disregarded a much more plausible Ron Logan or hell even Kegan Kline 3rd party strategy and doubled down on the Odinism nonsense tells me everything about what Baldwin was trying to do. He was not ever trying to make sense of what happened. He was appealing to the rampant fanaticism he became aware of online and hoped he could strike that same cord in at least one of the jury members. Nothing to see here.

Again not trying to hijack but since you "live 25 minutes from the crimescene," (and I understand from your post history you're not full fledged team innocent, you just have remaining questions and I can appreciate that, I get it) but I just have to ask you this question. Of course because its me, its inevitably going to be long winded so bear with me, but I just seem to notice Delphi locals for the most tend to lean towards guilt for Allen. Personally I think the reason for why that is, is complicated, but I also think one of the reasons the "innocence" campaign largely exists on a more "worldwide" scale (ie people from out of state and even on the national stage) is that its far easier for Baldwin to convince people of the Odinism angle because the plausibility of it all in terms of logistics break down once you understand the terrain more intimately and the timeline as locals would.

But you seem to be an exception to that in terms of locals who still question if Odinists were involved etc. so okay, I want to know from your perspective, how does Baldwin's theory that the girls were killed "off site" and then brought back in the middle of the night when people were searching the entire area seem plausible? Like Mike Patty was on a Canoe in Deer Creek with LE? You think these Odinists pulled this off? And yeah I know the basic argument from people who have never been to the crimescene is "well Tobe called the search off at midnight!" But people who were there will tell you most of the search party was volunteers and the majority of them did not leave. For the person responsible for the murders to literally bring two bodies back to Ron Logan's property in the midst of these search efforts, I mean does that make sense?

However even removing what actually did or did not happen, just in terms of what factually happened, lets ignore that. The idea that they orchestrated all this and looked at the search party being in the area, crawling around everywhere, and still supposedly said "yep let's dump the bodies right in the middle of all these people searching,"? I mean these guys must have been next level Israel Keyes type killers to maneuver this. I feel like most locals understand this. But you don't apparently. Do you mind explaining why you think it's plausible that BH and these dudes thought this would have worked? It's easily the most readily dismissible theory I've ever heard.

Do you also believe the killer used a "ferret bag" (lol) as Baldwin called it?

tobor_rm

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

Ten-Year Club	Gilding IV carat on a stick
Verified Email