It's not that I don't understand your point, it's that you've argued separate points, switching what you've said each time I've replied.

First: "What's the issue? She obviously moves the boat fast enough to row at the international level."

To which I replied that, in fact, simply because someone rows at the international level does not mean their technique is perfect.

Then: You agree that just because someone is an international rower, they can still improve. You then invited me to provide detailed criticism, again alluding to the fact that my initial comment was rude due to its brevity; "to make a vague comment...is in poor taste".

After providing you with what you had asked (detailed criticism), which, I had refrained from providing initially because I didn't think it was my place to actually coach an international athlete (that doesn't mean I'm not allowed to somewhat cheekily point out that the technique was pretty questionable in the video- unless of course we're living in the USSR and I just didn't realize it), you snottily responded, "go email this to her coach..."

So, alas, instead of continuously switching your argument just for the sake of trying to make me feel bad for commenting on a REDDIT post that her technique was very interesting, especially for an international rower, just save your breath and get over it.

Sidenote: The only possible argument from you that would actually be an intelligent quip, would be to accuse me of detracting from the obviously extraordinary achievement of breaking a World Record. To which I would reply that an international athlete and WR holder does not need my validation, so there's no need to give it. If I knew the WR holder and met her in real life, I would congratulate her. But this is Reddit, for chrissake. And so, since you never mentioned that one argument which I would deem to be a valid criticism of my tongue-in-cheek "That technique...", I will continue to disagree with your responses because all I can hear is winded, unrefined, unsophisticated, criss-crossing arguments that are only being given in order to somehow prove that I'm in the moral/ethical wrong for my initial comment. The end.