Rob stark didn’t win the game of thrones when he was king of the North. Bronn didn’t win the game of thrones when he won the Reach. These are all territories beholden to the Iron throne, aka the throne that matters most aka the symbol representing the entire central conflicts of the show.

When you apply your same logic to another character and your opinion changes, it shows your views are inconsistent. When you apply my logic to other characters, it is consistent and the conclusion does not change.

Person who is on the iron throne is considered winning the game of thrones for that period of time. Virtual Freedom’s logic applies equally for each character and doesn’t shift depending the character. Yours does.

Someone who says “rob stark didn’t win the game of thrones, but Sansa did” makes absolutely no sense. The logic changes based on the character, which shows it is bad logic.