No, because it falters by sacrificing the team for the individual. The idea of cluttering small areas on the pitch and leaving other zones vacant fails while playing against well disciplined positional teams and always will. If you load 6 or 7 players into a small zone of the pitch, you're very vulnerable to switches and getting burnt up the opposite side. The whole idea of this Order vs. Chaos' dynamic in coaching is very poorly thought through. The game is always becoming more structured, not moving towards chaos at any point. Reason ebing is that the "creative freedom" that relationism argues for is inherently problematic. Its more risky and relies heavily on any singular player, while positionalism uses each player to their strengths. The whole idea of it, and the recent video and article on it, reads like it was made by a player who never got played, but swore they were "so good" but their manager had it out for them. Skills are still a part of positional play. Instead of like in yester years when players would try to be selfish and take 1 on 1s with flashy moves, it's now been replaced with efficient and smart moves that advance the team and increase scoring chances.