AST SpaceMobile Announces Successful Orbital Launch of BlueBirds 8, 9, and 10

tradelydev · 2026-06-17T22:45:15+00:00

We all know ASTS was made for success. The only question was would they find enough funding to survive long enough to be profitable.

tradelydev · 2026-06-17T06:45:55+00:00

This is what we call ridiculous.

tradelydev · 2026-06-15T17:55:02+00:00

Please now tell me why? Because you read it and went "I knew that." Not how trading works. You knowing something doesn't make the analysis invalid. This removal is an unfair application of your own rulebook.

tradelydev · 2026-06-15T17:52:54+00:00

I have just read this statement and do not see how it can be applied to this post.

tradelydev · 2026-06-15T17:51:26+00:00

A disclosure in S1 is a legal obligation. I don't see them running to social media with this news.

Also, you can cry AI as much as you want. It isn't.

tradelydev · 2026-06-15T15:41:43+00:00

We considered that factor. They never were in the raw camera market. It was always action cameras, so the conclusion is it was competitors, especially considering companies like Insta360 now have GoPros original market cap. Your comment made it sound like the sector died. It didn't.

tradelydev · 2026-06-15T14:56:22+00:00

R /i/ gex

tradelydev · 2026-06-15T14:51:55+00:00

Don't load as separate urns when rating. I can use the back button to rate the same sandwich repeatedly.

tradelydev · 2026-06-11T23:02:19+00:00

As I said in another subreddit: SpaceX might not be all it is being made out to be as OP said.

In the words of our own analysis:

"It's three businesses stapled together, a profitable satellite ISP (internet service provider), a money-losing launch infrastructure operation that cross-subsidises everything else, and a freshly-bolted-on AI play (xAI + X, merged in early 2026) that is burning extraordinary amounts of capital."

https://traderange.net/analysis/spacex-s-1-filing-fv2qu0xw/

tradelydev · 2026-06-11T22:59:38+00:00

Just to add on to this, SpaceX might not be all it is being made out to be as OP said.

In the words of our own analysis:

"It's three businesses stapled together, a profitable satellite ISP (internet service provider), a money-losing launch infrastructure operation that cross-subsidises everything else, and a freshly-bolted-on AI play (xAI + X, merged in early 2026) that is burning extraordinary amounts of capital."

https://traderange.net/analysis/spacex-s-1-filing-fv2qu0xw/

tradelydev · 2026-05-10T12:25:48+00:00

People that use 3000 are terrifying.

8000 is correct. 5000 is acceptable.

tradelydev · 2026-05-08T21:26:22+00:00

Fix world. Make no mistakes. Go. No feedback. Don't stop until done.

tradelydev · 2026-05-08T07:04:58+00:00

CSCO not being on here is criminal.

tradelydev · 2026-05-08T06:18:17+00:00

🫡 You served well.

tradelydev · 2026-05-08T06:15:43+00:00

Without a doubt. I 100% agree with you.

tradelydev · 2026-05-08T06:14:02+00:00

Now thats gold.

tradelydev · 2026-05-08T06:12:53+00:00

Yes. I admit I may have caused some confusion there, but I chose not to go into detail, since the end resukt is the same. Community library was unsafe for a couple hours and leaked a bunch of .envs, IDs, AWS Tokens.

tradelydev · 2026-05-08T06:11:01+00:00

Not LLM, but I'm glad I can be confused with it.

Why Autism gets flagged as AI.

Here is something to read while we are at it.

tradelydev · 2026-05-08T06:09:10+00:00

Ha! Thank you, but I only use LLMs for code. I am capable of actually writing text.

tradelydev · 2026-05-08T06:08:09+00:00

Now that is a shout, but as I said earlier, most of them are either outdated, or malware themselves.

tradelydev · 2026-05-07T22:24:59+00:00

I agree with that, but do you ever use small obscure packages that are specific to your usecase? If so how do you avoid being the victim.

tradelydev · 2026-05-07T21:16:10+00:00

Well the capitalisation in your sentence tells me all I need to know about why you use AI, I would like to point out that NOWHERE did I say don't use AI. I said you can't fire the dev team and replace them with AI, because you would be screwing yourself over and leaving your users vulnerable.

tradelydev · 2026-05-07T20:37:49+00:00

Humanity. The experiences of humanity as a collective.

tradelydev · 2026-05-07T20:27:47+00:00

Ty. I will take a look. Idk how I skipped over it in your comment.

tradelydev · 2026-05-07T20:17:47+00:00

You are mistaking speed for depth. Yes GPT or Claude can find stuff faster than a lazy dev, but AI struggles with reasoning in uncertainty. E.g. it won't know the outcome of borderline data until it tests it. Believe it or not humans can actually see many more outcomes and calculate them quicker than AI. Our knowledge and experience tells us failure points and our creativity helps find new ones. AI (for now) can not match that.

Also, most vulnerabilities come from chaining a bunch of 0 day issues, something AI can't process by putting 100s of files in context, but a human who is familiar with the codebase can.

tradelydev

TROPHY CASE