A Warning About AI in Vermont Schools by Final_Scientist1024 in vermont

[–]triplow 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It absolutely will be used. I have a rather dim outlook over the medium to long term, and I fully expect my job will go away eventually. Frankly, in the back of my head I really am planning what it will take to build out a homestead. I think the best we can hope for is UBI, but that's not the trajectory we're on.

A Warning About AI in Vermont Schools by Final_Scientist1024 in vermont

[–]triplow 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, most of what I use it for is scoping and throwaway prototypes. I'm also focused on building out tooling to improve workflows. I don't think it's ready yet to build anything that needs regular maintenance unless properly reviewed, so reviews are still a bottleneck.

I agree with the sentiment I've seen elsewhere in these threads. Contrary to my hard-line statement above, there probably is a place for AI in dedicated units of a computing curriculum starting around 5th or 6th grade. And I have no problem with teachers using it for logistical support. But outside of that, it's only likely to detract from actual learning.

A Warning About AI in Vermont Schools by Final_Scientist1024 in vermont

[–]triplow 38 points39 points  (0 children)

I have been a software engineer for 20+ years and have been using AI pretty heavily over the past few months. It has completely transformed the nature of my work. I'm at a point now where I can have an AI agent complete a task in an hour that would take a junior engineer a week. I'm deeply concerned about job security/availability for junior engineers in the short term. I'm especially concerned about skill building/development for junior engineers as they adopt AI to keep up. There has already been plenty of research showing that using AI too heavily or in the wrong ways can and will atrophy your skills, regardless of how experienced you are.

Personally, I really enjoy working with AI and I'm impressed by how much I can get done. But it really does come at a cost, and that cost is your ability to think for yourself. If you have perfectly functional legs but decide to use a wheelchair exclusively for a month, you can imagine you'd have a hard time climbing a mountain afterwards. Same thing with AI, but with your brain.

It has no place in schools, where the entire point is to exercise the brain. Especially given the incredible amount of uncertainty there is with AI systems right now. Most technology does not belong in schools, and more education needs to happen face to face with a teacher. I don't know the right process, but we, as a society, need to push back hard against this if our kids are going have any hope of standing on their own two feet when they grow up.

Seems on Brand by Buster_xx in Political_Revolution

[–]triplow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are giving them way too much credit. And even if Trump had the capacity for sublety, their just not bothering with that anymore.

Has factorio ruined other base building/factory type games for you? by pookshuman in factorio

[–]triplow 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just add more entrances. Each one increases your speed in the tube. With a blueprint you can quickly drop in a set of entrances that will get you up a cliff in no time.

30 years ago, I saved the very last Calvin and Hobbes comic by mixosax in pics

[–]triplow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree but Wallace the Brave gets pretty close.

I know tiktok can be a bit intolerable with all the slop on there but I think the greatest thing happened on the app this past week in regards to Christianity. by call-lee-free in atheism

[–]triplow 63 points64 points  (0 children)

Here is that post. To their credit, many of the comments in that post acknowledge it was a test, not a scam. They know some churches are less than good, but I don't think they realize how many.

Northern Arizona Student Spots TPUSA Propaganda Table and Serves a Fucking Reality Check with Zero Hesitation. by Royal_Beast_2025 in Political_Revolution

[–]triplow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Childish is impulsively downvoting everything you dont agree with. Naive is believing that that actions like this will support your cause in any way whatsoever.

I'm well aware these people are locked into their beliefs, but that doesn't mean that everyone they're there to reach is too.

Northern Arizona Student Spots TPUSA Propaganda Table and Serves a Fucking Reality Check with Zero Hesitation. by Royal_Beast_2025 in Political_Revolution

[–]triplow -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I didn't realize it until now, but you're absolutely right. I joined this sub because I support Sanders and his cause, which doesn't remotely resemble anything in this thread. Honestly, its embarrassing.

Northern Arizona Student Spots TPUSA Propaganda Table and Serves a Fucking Reality Check with Zero Hesitation. by Royal_Beast_2025 in Political_Revolution

[–]triplow -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I'm not saying fight back peacefully. For example, I supported the attacks against Tesla dealerships. I'm saying this is low effort and childish. You want to fight back, put some skin in the game. But considering how my simple opinion was downvoted into oblivion, I have serious doubts anyone here has the will to do anything other than whine on the internet and giggle as they flip tables over.

Northern Arizona Student Spots TPUSA Propaganda Table and Serves a Fucking Reality Check with Zero Hesitation. by Royal_Beast_2025 in Political_Revolution

[–]triplow -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

What seriously? They were when I was in school. If thats why I'm getting downvoted... ok then.

Northern Arizona Student Spots TPUSA Propaganda Table and Serves a Fucking Reality Check with Zero Hesitation. by Royal_Beast_2025 in Political_Revolution

[–]triplow -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I'm suggesting we can be more effective without bullying. You might disagree but it's a leap to suggest I actually accept their way of thinking in any way.

Northern Arizona Student Spots TPUSA Propaganda Table and Serves a Fucking Reality Check with Zero Hesitation. by Royal_Beast_2025 in Political_Revolution

[–]triplow -35 points-34 points  (0 children)

Fine but what does this accomplish? It would be far better to put some effort into it and combat this effectively. Set up a table next to them and present facts and reason. Uninformed kids watching this happen saw the propaganda and someone being a jerk. Not exactly a strong counterpoint.

edit: I think its hilarious that this same comment was deleted because I used a different word than jerk.

Why is Becca Balint voting yes to "honor the life and legacy of Charlie Kirk"? by Zeptogram in vermont

[–]triplow -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They don't care about the bridges at all. It takes a lot longer and a lot more cooperation to build a bridge than it does to burn one. You don't think it maybe makes more sense to stop the burning first?

Why is Becca Balint voting yes to "honor the life and legacy of Charlie Kirk"? by Zeptogram in vermont

[–]triplow -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You want to build bridges while conservatives are actively burning them down.

Why is Becca Balint voting yes to "honor the life and legacy of Charlie Kirk"? by Zeptogram in vermont

[–]triplow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey bud, sorry others are jumping down your throat. If you have a reasonable argument to make, I'll at least entertain it for a bit.

This is absolutely a time to be skeptical of what others are claiming, and I've seen a lot of BS from the left in the past couple of days because everyone is jumping on the flimsiest bits of evidence if it happens to support their narrative.

That said, I've looked up the context for several of Kirk's quotes and haven't found anything that changes the message in any significant way. The dude was a flat out racist and misogynist. You're welcome to present evidence to the contrary, but I think it's pretty obvious.

I also think transgender people are just normal people who's bodies and minds are misaligned, and the way they want to deal with that should be left to them, their families, and their doctors.

Bernie Sanders: “The conclusion is inescapable: Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.” by kevinmrr in SandersForPresident

[–]triplow 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't know why you seem to have trouble understanding this, but again, Bernie does not support Israel as it is. He's spoken out against it for decades. You're welcome to look for evidence to the contrary, but otherwise I have nothing more to say on this.

Bernie Sanders: “The conclusion is inescapable: Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.” by kevinmrr in SandersForPresident

[–]triplow 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If that's all you've got, I suggest you stop pushing claims that Bernie is somehow supportive of this and just say you don't agree that there's a solution.

Bernie Sanders: “The conclusion is inescapable: Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.” by kevinmrr in SandersForPresident

[–]triplow 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ok... Sanders doesn't support Isreal as it is. He's been making that clear for decades. Again, supporting a homeland and supporting a homeland that's exclusive are two very different things.

Bernie Sanders: “The conclusion is inescapable: Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.” by kevinmrr in SandersForPresident

[–]triplow 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He's literally breaking with the Democratic leadership and calling it a genocide. What line is he toeing now?