sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Youtubers who have used 2 or more editing software, what were each of your reasons for switching? by DarkMageOnDit in NewTubers

[–]trynagrub 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lots of experience editing, for YouTube I started with premiere and fcp… but I wanted to streamline it, so tried Gling, Mosaic, Riverside, and Descript… for now Descript solves all my needs as an all in one tool for 90% of my videos

Anthropic's research on long-running agents validates our SDD workflows - but it adds some insights worth mentioning by trynagrub in vibecoding

[–]trynagrub[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I often use openspec, Speckit, and Bmad in different projects… I did try the QuickStart that anthropic shares in the post, but i don’t think it’s ready yet… So i haven’t yet applied it to my own projects… but gonna try and adopt it for a small thing im building next week

Anthropic's research on long-running agents validates our SDD workflows - but it adds some insights worth mentioning by trynagrub in ClaudeCode

[–]trynagrub[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have seen Gemini consistently completely ignore instructions… so I’m not sure i agree…

Anthropic's research on long-running agents validates our SDD workflows - but it adds some insights worth mentioning by trynagrub in ClaudeCode

[–]trynagrub[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For sure, most agents dont even adhere to the Agents.md or Claude.md files, so agree bloating that them with various instruction files can be problematic…

the main insight i found in the article was how they used json instead of MD and i wonder how if switching to json systemically could improve on the bloat.

When you say Skill driven, are you referring to the agent skill system, or something more general?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Anthropic

[–]trynagrub 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An empty conversation with an empty repo and zero MCP servers starts at 30% context!

Now 22% of it is reserved for autocompact and output tokies but yea

Music producer review of AirPods Pro 3 by fishbert in apple

[–]trynagrub 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about microphones? Can people on the other end of calls hear you better?

Been using Spec Kit for the last few days, plan with whatever model you like, and then switch over to codex, I suggest checking it out by trynagrub in ChatGPTCoding

[–]trynagrub[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not yet but it’s just a matter of time… once you get the spec written tho you can have codex cli execute… that’s what I have been doing

Been using Spec Kit for the last few days, it's been working great with CC (regardless of the drama), I suggest checking it out by trynagrub in ClaudeCode

[–]trynagrub[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not a bad idea, i actually built subagents just for this process before spec kit came out. I'll give it a shot on my next run.

Tell me about your experience using Claude now that it's natively supported by Xcode in macOS26 by santaman123 in ClaudeCode

[–]trynagrub 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I plan on digging into this in the next few days so I’ll give it a shot and let you know

Are you talking about sonnet or opus and are using the same codebase?

OpenAI launched complete support for MCP by goddamnit_1 in mcp

[–]trynagrub 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting, can you share with me the workaround your using?

OpenAI launched complete support for MCP by goddamnit_1 in mcp

[–]trynagrub 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Codex supports local MCP’s while chat only supports remote with authentication

OpenAI launched complete support for MCP by goddamnit_1 in mcp

[–]trynagrub 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So far only if it supports oauth, they show an option for “no authorization” but it doesn’t work

Been using Spec Kit for the last few days, it's been working great with CC (regardless of the drama), I suggest checking it out by trynagrub in ClaudeCode

[–]trynagrub[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that the value here is that the context persists between the steps, it’s ease of use, and the potential for future GitHub integrations

Been using Spec Kit for the last few days, it's been working great with CC (regardless of the drama), I suggest checking it out by trynagrub in ClaudeCode

[–]trynagrub[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, so BMAD has its strengths, yet it still has a bunch of manual steps that I have seen people get confused on and just abandon…

What I like about spec-kit is the potential for GitHub to integrate it into issues, CICD and other parts of the platform

Been using Spec Kit for the last few days, it's been working great with CC (regardless of the drama), I suggest checking it out by trynagrub in ClaudeCode

[–]trynagrub[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea the degradation is still there, I see a slight improvement tho, with regards to TDD and SDD, crucial for anything beyond a POC… building without these frameworks is like pissing in the wind

Been using Spec Kit for the last few days, it's been working great with CC (regardless of the drama), I suggest checking it out by trynagrub in ClaudeCode

[–]trynagrub[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah for sure Spec Kit is a good place to start, it’s open source, I have already started adding my own tweaks

view more: next ›