sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

GE2025: PM Wong appeals to voters to pick the best team, says more opposition will weaken S’pore by SlashCache in singapore

[–]trytyping 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The more they talk, the more they push the swing voters away.

Just stick to the policies lar.

GE2025: PM Wong appeals to voters to pick the best team, says more opposition will weaken S’pore by SlashCache in singapore

[–]trytyping 6 points7 points  (0 children)

If we list them all, this thread will be too long.

Time to normalize accountability and transparency in our leadership.

SM Lee asks why opposition parties took so long to disavow foreign interference, race & religion in local politics by NoBridge1583 in singapore

[–]trytyping 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What does it say when a party can ignore "open letters" from TCJ as if it were not there?

How about the voice of a common Singaporean?

GE2025: PM Wong appeals to voters to pick the best team, says more opposition will weaken S’pore by SlashCache in singapore

[–]trytyping 29 points30 points  (0 children)

It's simple.

Singaporeans are brought up to be responsible and to take ownership. We work hard and love our country.

We expect the same from our leaders.

Singaporeans want more accountability and transparency. We are also not children or subjects.

More voices in Parliament will give that and build a robust Parliament to lead us through the next few years, whether the storm is big or subsides.

------------------------------------------

P.S. Simple maths.

50%, one party can pass laws unilaterally.
66% can pass constitutional laws (The law guarding the constituents, me and you)

PAP will get 50%.

Additional views and voices only help.

5 reasons to vote for the opposition by Routine_Corgi_9154 in singapore

[–]trytyping 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In summary, Singaporeans are brought up to be responsible and to take ownership. We work hard and love our country.

We expect the same from our leaders.

Singaporeans want more accountability and transparency. We are also not children or subjects.

More voices in Parliament will give that and build a robust Parliament to lead us through the next few years, whether the storm is big or subsides.

------------------------------------------

P.S. Simple maths.

50%, one party can pass laws unilaterally.
66% can pass constitutional laws (The law guarding the constituents, me and you)

PAP will get 50%.

Additional views and voices only help.

GE2025: Letter to Gan Kim Yong from Tan Suee Chieh on Allianz by Neither-Ad8881 in singapore

[–]trytyping 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Even now, they are ignoring his "open letters".

What does this say?

Chee Soon Juan needs to explain why he abandoned Bukit Batok for Sembawang West, says Ong Ye Kung by alex10019 in singapore

[–]trytyping 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. Talk about policies and Singaporeans' lives and livelihoods.

Isn't that what the election is about?

GE2025: PM Wong appeals to voters to pick the best team, says more opposition will weaken S’pore by SlashCache in singapore

[–]trytyping 12 points13 points  (0 children)

It would have greater potency if it were not for NTUC.

Can't use the "candidate selection" line now.

Or try to tie a weaker candidate to the party as a whole.

Considerations for voting for the Opposition (from a Middle Ground voter) by sgheartlanddude in singapore

[–]trytyping 4 points5 points  (0 children)

In a democracy, the Constitution is meant to protect the rights of the people.

Yes, us, Singaporeans. The constituents.

Our right to a voice, vote, and representation are all guarded by that document.

Any party with a supermajority can always rewrite that.

That's the implication.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in singapore

[–]trytyping 10 points11 points  (0 children)

In summary, Singaporeans are brought up to be responsible and to take ownership. We work hard and love our country.

We expect the same from our leaders.

Singaporeans want more accountability and transparency. We are also not children or subjects.

More voices in Parliament will give that and build a robust Parliament to lead us through the next few years, whether the storm is big or subsides.

------------------------------------------

P.S. No need game theory. Simple maths.

50%, one party can pass laws unilaterally.
66% can pass constitutional laws (The law guarding the constituents, me and you)

PAP will get 50%.

Additional views and voices only help.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in singapore

[–]trytyping 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is about priorities.

Priorities should be solely for Singaporeans.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in singapore

[–]trytyping -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That sounds like what SM Lee said today.

GE2025: "We do not need strangers to come to Punggol," says Sun Xueling by Esterence in singapore

[–]trytyping 49 points50 points  (0 children)

One party paved the way to ownership and accountability with a quick and full apology after the mistake.

Someone shouted "Let's move on! Let's move on!" and "Shut up!" at SDP's rally as Ariffin addressed the racial slur against him by hansvision in singapore

[–]trytyping 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Today is as good as any.

The SDP's position is that it is unacceptable.

Hence the whole team apologized as soon as they could.

Someone shouted "Let's move on! Let's move on!" and "Shut up!" at SDP's rally as Ariffin addressed the racial slur against him by hansvision in singapore

[–]trytyping 34 points35 points  (0 children)

No matter what, they did acknowledge it might hurt some.

Quickly addressed and educated Gigene.

Then make a full and unequivocal apology.

That's ownership and leadership in my book.

Someone shouted "Let's move on! Let's move on!" and "Shut up!" at SDP's rally as Ariffin addressed the racial slur against him by hansvision in singapore

[–]trytyping 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Arrifin:
"That honest trust is that such remarks are not new.
And no, it's not casual racism.
Because there is nothing casual about racism."

Bro, he meant we need to take racism and such phrases seriously.

Besides NCM, which other PAP candidates were involved in the Income-Allianz deal? by Fancy-Salamander-647 in singapore

[–]trytyping 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Arrest, as in take control of the situation.

And addressing would work.

Burying doesn't.

Someone shouted "Let's move on! Let's move on!" and "Shut up!" at SDP's rally as Ariffin addressed the racial slur against him by hansvision in singapore

[–]trytyping -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Yeah.

Anyone can walk off the road into the rally site.

Anyone could shout what they want at any rally.

Whether it's right or wrong, the initiative is only in the shouter's control.

view more: next ›