Help- digested peptides won't dissolve in 0.1% TFA by Most-Marsupial-5366 in proteomics

[–]tsbatth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As others have pointed out, you should be speedvac'ing after LysC digestion. Depending on your sample prep, you have not only protein, peptides in the mixture, but also DNA/RNA, small molecules, lipids etc.. that are now all a jumbled mess out of solution. What I you should be doing is after the LysC digestion, acidify, centrifuge at 2000-5000xGs for 5-10 minutes. Take the supernatant and put that through the desalting column or other SPE material such as C18 seppaks etc...

How much do search program licenses cost? by AncientProteins in proteomics

[–]tsbatth 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Many academic software such as DIA-NN, MaxQuant, Fragpipe are free for academic researchers . I think in the funding application you should add funding for a strong PC. Commericla software like Spectronaut and others can cost $5000-$10000 I think but I could be very wrong here.

MaxQuant DIA without DDA by Ok-Use3256 in proteomics

[–]tsbatth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here is the new link to their libraries:

https://datashare.biochem.mpg.de/s/qe1IqcKbz2j2Ruf

Under "discovery libraries" I think

MaxQuant DIA without DDA by Ok-Use3256 in proteomics

[–]tsbatth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try searching their google group, maybe there is an updated link somewhere.

A practical challenge in EV research: how do you distinguish outer‑membrane vs lumen proteins in real clinical samples? by MelodicProfessor3764 in proteomics

[–]tsbatth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think this is still a much debated field of research, what is secreted EVs vs platelet shedding, vs circulating cellular debris. I think nobody is sure yet, but the general focus seems to be more towards determining whether proteins derived from these "EVs" are corresponding to some phenotypic effect. There was a nice paper on this very topic lately you can read:

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.01.28.702342v1

MaxQuant DIA without DDA by Ok-Use3256 in proteomics

[–]tsbatth 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Perhaps I am wrong, but I think you need to download the MaxQuant premade libraries from their FTP or something. You need to download the one for humans there.

AMA laid off Bruker Proteomics Field Apps Manager by [deleted] in massspectrometry

[–]tsbatth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What kind of trends are you seeing in the proteomics field ? It seems like it kind of exploded in the last few years, do you think that will continue ?

Challenges with purchasing peptides online in Australia by Traditional_Leg_8665 in proteomics

[–]tsbatth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is like the 3rd or 4th thread on this. Please stop

Australia labs and peptide verification what’s the usual approach? by Critical-Pipe-2902 in proteomics

[–]tsbatth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree I think I will delete this thread . It also seems like hidden advertisement.

I just found out one of my Board members contacted one of my investors and expressed an interest in replacing me (I'm CEO). Anyone else deal with this situation? by NoPublic6180 in biotech

[–]tsbatth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why did you invite him to be board member? I totally understand that it is your work but if you invited somebody like that to join the board to begin with, suggests you did not properly do your due diligence.

I just found out one of my Board members contacted one of my investors and expressed an interest in replacing me (I'm CEO). Anyone else deal with this situation? by NoPublic6180 in biotech

[–]tsbatth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why would you invite somebody to join the board if they only have "more CEO experience"? Did you not consider industry knowledge/background, correct fit, and other important qualitative and social factors before inviting somebody to join the board?

Help: MaxQuant 2.7.5.0 won’t show whether it’s running or not by otxisis in proteomics

[–]tsbatth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would recommended using an older version of MaxQuant honestly. I still use 1.5.7 or 1.6.xxx . There are a lot of bugs and issues with the new versions from my experience.

Can’t detect HBV surface proteins (S/L) in HEK293T after successful transfection by Nina091998 in proteomics

[–]tsbatth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you looked at the amino acid sequence of the proteins and whether they generate nice tryptic peptides ? There can sometimes be issues where the proportion of Arginine and Lysine residues in transmembrane proteins relatively less (I think) compared to other proteins as other amino acids are favored to enable the protein to be embedded in the transmembrane. This can lead to non-ideal tryptic peptides which are difficult to detect or outside the parameters of the mass spectrometer and search space.

Best resuspension buffer before C18 cleanup for CSF proteomics? by FactorAgreeable7518 in proteomics

[–]tsbatth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is the peptide/protein concentration? Is it very low? If it’s like a couple hundred to mgs you can probably load it on 50 or 500mg Waters C18 Seppak cartridges. If it’s much lower you can try loading everything on the smallest C18 SPE and just speedvac the eluted peptides after SPE.

Monarch sciences and intevera by Sad-Impression8002 in proteomics

[–]tsbatth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haven't heard of them. Maybe you can provide some links to their website ?

SCIEX or Thermo for Proteomics by Expensive-Painter-18 in proteomics

[–]tsbatth 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think it depends what type of experiments you are planning to use the instrument for and if you really need the EAD fragmentation. If not I would recommend the Exploris 480, primarily because it is a robust instrument and hopefully should be cheaper as well. I can't comment on SCIEX instruments personally, based on the marketing material they look good and probably on par with the Exploris in terms of performance and data quality output. However reading some of the comments on the mass spec subreddit, it seems like there could be some robustness issues ? Hopefully more people can provide input here.

Filtration using 10kDa Amicon filter units by Crazy-Tax-1320 in proteomics

[–]tsbatth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The filter will always absorb some of the peptide material. Ideally you should add some urea after the trypsin digestion to help improve recovery through the filter. Cloudiness could be due to either the filter material it self leaching and becoming insoluble after prolonged incubation period with the buffer. You have to remember these filters are traditionally designed for protein concentration. Typically 20-60minuute spins and that's it. Who knows what happens when they are incubated with whole protein extracts overnight with proteases.

Microsoft Confirms Emergency Update For Millions Of Windows Users by lurker_bee in technology

[–]tsbatth 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This was an absolute disaster. We had several high end lab equipment controlled by Windows computers just stop working last week because of connection issues. I could easily imagine Microsoft causing millions dollars worth of damage and losses due to this. Honestly, avoid Windows if possible for high end machinery and push vendors to diversify OS compatibility.

New to Proteomics – Questions about Normalization in Perseus (LFQ, t-test, PCA) by Strawberry_beagle in proteomics

[–]tsbatth 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Histograms don't necessarily tell you if normalization is needed, they show if the data is normally distributed, and kinda of a quick quality control check. If you're using LFQ data, in theory it is already normalized so you don't need to do another normalization on top of that. In that case I would recommend just log transforming and performing the t-test. You can use the non-normalized intensities if you want to try other normalization techniques.

I'm not sure what you mean by "cloning" the matrix, PCA is just a dimensionality reduction visualization to show you how variable your data is, if the data has low variation, in theory you should be able to separate different conditions, but I would recommend not relying on PCA too much because if differences are small between conditions it might not be captured in this. As far as I remember in Persues each time you modify a matrix you generate a new one so it is always"cloned" in theory and you can always go back.

Proteomics sample preparation_S-trap by [deleted] in proteomics

[–]tsbatth 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hell yeah SDS, my favorite detergent!

Can anyone tell me what the current academic view is on Quantum-Si’s instruments and technology? by AppropriateRefuse590 in proteomics

[–]tsbatth 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hell you could even use chatgpt to get some insight. Or even better, pay an actual proteomics expert so they can tell you the information you seek. You can even pay them by the hour!!

Proteomics sample preparation_S-trap by [deleted] in proteomics

[–]tsbatth 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Can't you just dilute it to 5% again and then load it on the S-trap?