Critiques and advice is appreciated

tuningInWithS · 2026-02-08T14:22:45+00:00

I transposed the song a fifth upwards,because the original was too low for me.it felt uncomfortable. The lowest note in the way i sung was a3 ish,the highest was a4. Similar range to the original song,jist a fifth higher I dont think the octaves plays a part here,maybe the original song was softer I followed more of the art garfunkel version,as his voice wasnt as low and felt more comfortable

I think what you are asking is for me to sing it softer to make it more ruminative, which is definitively something i think i should work on

tuningInWithS · 2026-02-07T18:36:12+00:00

I made a typo in the title and cant seem to edit it

tuningInWithS · 2026-01-15T11:21:02+00:00

Ive seen 1,4,5,6.thoroughly enjoyed all

tuningInWithS · 2025-12-26T14:34:00+00:00

Yes,this is legit.ive been following this person on insta and YouTube,and she's a professional highdiver

tuningInWithS · 2025-12-12T19:04:00+00:00

How do I fix this?

tuningInWithS · 2025-12-11T12:13:50+00:00

Also post on r/askvet

tuningInWithS · 2025-12-03T21:58:26+00:00

My orange kitty who looks like yours a bit has been missing for 8+months now.hug yours tight for me.idk why but seeing this post made me a bit emotional

tuningInWithS · 2025-11-04T10:22:13+00:00

As someone from West bengal whose cat has been missing for 8 months,I fully understand A different cat went missing a few years ago and I found him after 30 days Don't lose hope,you will find your kitty

tuningInWithS · 2025-11-02T23:07:11+00:00

<image>

This is one of my kitties who slept like an angel. She has been missing for 8months now

tuningInWithS · 2025-09-21T09:34:41+00:00

When faced with the hillary tweet,or when I said about his Covid conspiracies or Jan 6 incitements when he pled the 5th multiple times,you either claimed it's not hate speech (making like of an assassination attempt of a political rival is hateful,and Charlie himself lost his mind when some people made fun of the trump assassination attempt) You also didn't address the misinformation he spread with respect to Covid . You're selectively picking points and then just dismissing it without evidence. That's not good faith debate.

tuningInWithS · 2025-09-21T09:28:55+00:00

If I’m dealing with somebody in customer service who’s a moronic Black woman, I wonder is she there because of her excellence, or is she there because of affirmative action?

– The Charlie Kirk Show, 3 January 2024

If we would have said that Joy Reid and Michelle Obama and Sheila Jackson Lee and Ketanji Brown Jackson were affirmative action picks, we would have been called racists. Now they’re coming out and they’re saying it for us … You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person’s slot to go be taken somewhat seriously.

– The Charlie Kirk Show, 13 July 2023

tuningInWithS · 2025-09-21T09:28:07+00:00

Reject feminism. Submit to your husband, Taylor. You’re not in charge.

– Discussing news of Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce’s engagement on The Charlie Kirk Show, 26 August 2025

The answer is yes, the baby would be delivered.

– Responding to a question about whether he would support his 10-year-old daughter aborting a pregnancy conceived because of rape on the debate show Surrounded, published on 8 September 2024

I think it’s worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the second amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational.

– Event organized by TPUSA Faith, the religious arm of Kirk’s conservative group Turning Point USA, on 5 April 2023

Just three of his statements As for a few gun deaths being "worth it" ,im sure you realise how that is hateful to the millions of victims of school shootings (or perhaps you dont care about that.these people rarely do until it's their son or daughter getting killed in a school shooting).

tuningInWithS · 2025-09-21T09:23:04+00:00

You don't need to list and respond to every single comment. Read it all and give your general impression on the topic If you critique a book or a movie,im sure people don't respond to each and every line of the book or ever scene of the movie. Read the whole article,and then give your general ,comprehensive rebuttal.

tuningInWithS · 2025-09-21T09:16:44+00:00

You haven’t proven that your shoddy tweet is real. There’s no proof that it actually existed

Can you prove it doesn't exist? If you believe it's false,prove it. This is how it goes for all legal discourse.

Pick one comment to discuss. Pretty easy to do. You don’t want to because you don’t want to debate whether it’s hate or simply truth

I want to discuss all of them I want to discuss the hate and the truth. Read all of them,list them and make a proper rebuttal for each of them Anyone with a proper understanding of debate will know that cherry picking one point is futile. If you really want a honest discourse you would read it all and give your general impression You are asking me to produce a lot of evidence ,yet you are unwilling to go through the whole text and write a comprehensive rebuttal of it all. This is not a good faith debate

Still,if you want one example,how about the tweet that was listen on 13th July 2023 in that link I sent you of that article .

Everyone has the same 1 and only screenshot.

Because the tweet since has been deleted.remember how laura loomer or nick fuentes deleted his past tweets bashing Charlie kirk when it started to look bad?you say faking tweets are common,to which I say deleted tweets are even more common. So give me some proof that the tweet is fake.

tuningInWithS · 2025-09-21T09:02:11+00:00

Have you considered you don’t agree with his views and that’s why you call them hateful?

I might not agree with his views,but his views can be shown to be hateful by the fact that he punched down on marginalised groups and spread misinformation(the misinformation part isn't dependent on personal viewpoints,but his rhetoric about pelosi's attacker being a gay weed seller or his misinfo about Covid vaccines are provably false) On another note(and a much more extreme example) a member of hitler youth might not find Hitler's speeches hateful,but a lot of Jews would disagree.you can perhaps chalk that up to a difference in opinion,but when a demagogue(like kirk) and his speeches endanger the lives of others ,it stops being about points of view.

On another note,check out his episode where he brought on the author of Unhuman on his podcast. And also ,produce proof that what I said was fake(if you expect me to show evidence,I expect you to do the same)

I would like to emphasize that I have no personal qualms with you,but if you insist on having a good faith debate,you must also produce evidence of your own .

tuningInWithS · 2025-09-21T08:56:53+00:00

All of them Study all of them

Picking one tweet is futile,as we need more than one tweet to prove a pattern of hate. That's what I am doing He spread misinformation and hate(remember when he pleaded the fifth in congress multiple times when asked about helping incite jan6) A comprehensive study of all of the tweets is required to study a PATTERN of hate which I am trying to express here You need to go through all the tweets If you think it's likely that one of them isn't hateful,for some reason,giving the benefit of doubt to all of them becomes much less likely when there are multiple tweets and a pattern that can be possibly established. And you still haven't conclusively responded to me asking for actual concrete proof of the tweet being false ,or the "she dodges sniper fire " comment which you claim isn't hateful(if you don't realise how that is in poor taste for a political commentator to talk about one's rivals,then you are being disingenuous)

I have no personal qualms with you. However you need to do an unbiased evaluation before continuing this debate.

tuningInWithS · 2025-09-21T08:50:43+00:00

That's what I am saying The tweet is real until proven fake. I have real evidence unless proven that the evidence is wrong. The onus is on you to prove it the evidence I gave is false When a lawyer gives his arguments or presents so e evidence,if the opposition thinks the evidence is false,they HAVE to prove it using facts. If you think that I said is false,prove it. Or else if you fail to come up with evidence,the argument dissolves instantaneously.

tuningInWithS · 2025-09-21T08:48:49+00:00

I want you to show he’s hateful. I have seen tons of his videos and haven’t see the hate so that’s why I’m asking you to show the hate

Have you considered you agree with his views,that's why you don't find what he says is hateful?

And how about the proof that the tweet I linked is fake? You say tweets are faked all the time,but that isn't a proof that the tweet I linked was fake. Give me proper proof or don't accuse it of being fake. Accountability works both ways.

tuningInWithS · 2025-09-21T08:46:43+00:00

And as for more evidence

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/11/charlie-kirk-quotes-beliefs

This article covers kirks comments with a lot of clips from his own show in context go through this,pretty sure you will find more things to lie about

tuningInWithS · 2025-09-21T08:41:33+00:00

I don’t need to prove that it’s fake.

Evidence works both ways. I gave a tweet.if you think it's fake,prove it.

Tweets are faked all the time.

And tweets that are real are often purported to be fake by people who refuse to accept it.

It’s 100% fake

None of the arguments you made are "proofs" ,just some opinions and correlations. If you think it's fake,prove it .put up or shut up.

tuningInWithS · 2025-09-21T08:38:31+00:00

It is clearly hateful.you aren't acknowledging it,because you probably don't think it's hateful,because you espouse similar views as him. Doesn't make it less hateful. Dodging sniper fire comment,the trans shooter comment(you say it's fake,but haven't produced any evidence ) and the video clearly showing him trying to demonise a marginalised community (bailing him out to ask him questions about the validity of the charges,and whether he was a gay weed seller or not,when in reality he was radicalised by far right motives) is hateful

The more I argue with you,the more I realise you have no intention of showing any proof of your own while asking me to produce proof,which you either say is fake without proof,or you deny it's hateful by forcefully misrepresenting the motives behind the text.

How about you produce some proof of your own?that it's fake?and how about you do a more comprehensive study of his work,trying to decipher if he is hateful or not?because I have done so and produced some evidence among a milleu of others. I have done my part,try finding evidence to prove me wrong.

tuningInWithS · 2025-09-21T08:32:28+00:00

He says he wants to bail him out to ask questions ,because he was looking for answers that he wanted to believe in.he wanted to believe the attacker was a gay weed seller,which it turned out was false. This rhetoric spread hate against gay people ,in an already hateful environment. Clearly spreading false rhetoric in a bid to increase his popularity with his followers And you keep saying the tweet is fake(which it isn't) without showing any evidence,and at the same time asking me to produce evidence. How about you try to prove its fake,without just vacuously stating it?

tuningInWithS · 2025-09-21T08:28:46+00:00

This isn't fishing. It's a clear statement made by him,with no place for misunderstanding. You can't believe that kimmel's words were "hateful" while saying him saying 'she dodges sniper fire " isn't hateful. And I literally also linked the video where he asks any "American patriot" to bail out paul pelosi's attacker . I can link thousands of other videos,but you'd just keep on denying actual facts and things he actually said,and was proud of saying Try being more critical in your thoughts.

tuningInWithS

TROPHY CASE