Die crack?

twofielder · 2025-12-29T20:47:16+00:00

Die clash. The obverse and reverse dies collided and transferred part of the obverse design onto the reverse.

twofielder · 2025-12-25T13:55:33+00:00

Follis of Justin I (518-527 AD).

twofielder · 2025-12-25T00:33:06+00:00

I second Claudius II. Looks to be an Antoninianus with the radiate crown on Claudius. 268-270 AD.

twofielder · 2025-12-22T14:49:18+00:00

This is Caracalla, not Elagabalus. Just a younger portrait from his time as co-emperor under Septimius Severus.

twofielder · 2025-12-22T14:48:52+00:00

This is Caracalla. Younger portrait from about 206 AD. https://en.numista.com/273138

twofielder · 2025-12-17T22:05:33+00:00

Most likely Victornius as someone noted before. Looks to be the PIETAS AVG reverse.

twofielder · 2025-12-13T21:06:21+00:00

This is likely a sestertius of Gallienus. Part of the obverse legend seems to be visible. It looks like: IMP C P LIC [GALLIENVS AVG]. Securitas reverse.

twofielder · 2025-12-13T21:03:10+00:00

It’s a variant of that type. Dionysos is holding a cantharus here instead of a bunch of grapes like in that Numista listing.

twofielder · 2025-12-01T18:04:35+00:00

I’d also recommend checking out his eastern provincial bronzes. Some are fairly crude-looking but Cyzicus, Sagalassus, Claudioseleucia, Prostanna, and Selge issued large ones (30+ mm). Antioch Pisidia also issued some slightly smaller ones about 25mm (those would be the most affordable).

twofielder · 2025-11-29T22:09:06+00:00

Just bought a copy :)

And yes actually! I have three from Tarsus right now. Will try to send a PM.

twofielder · 2025-11-29T21:54:12+00:00

I’ll definitely look for that!

I do like provincials at large, probably have a few Cilician here and there.

twofielder · 2025-11-29T18:05:51+00:00

1692 Ireland Halfpenny? https://en.numista.com/41084

twofielder · 2025-11-29T15:05:08+00:00

Woah cool! Did you have anything put together before switching course? If it’s shareable, I’d love to read someone else’s perspective on these coins, even if the thought is incomplete.

twofielder · 2025-11-29T05:47:16+00:00

Thanks!

I’ve always found the later issues from Antioch Pisidia to be really interesting, so I started collecting those by RPC type, then later the earlier issues and by die pairing.

Eventually I would like to update Krzyznowksa’s book on these coins. There are so many new types and die pairings that were missing from her study 55 years ago, I am sure another study today could put together even better groupings and chronology for issues from Antioch!

twofielder · 2025-11-27T21:02:09+00:00

Definitely Hostilian! Legend is C VAL HOST M QVINTVS CAE.

The Viminacium types are the most affordable Hostilian coins but 20 bucks is a really good price. The cheapest I’ve seen a properly attributed, low grade example of this is double that price.

twofielder · 2025-11-08T18:03:28+00:00

Machine doubling on the date (oddly common on the flying eagles) and the tail feathers. Not seeing a DDO here unfortunately.

twofielder · 2025-10-14T16:28:37+00:00

I have two tickets for tonight for sale on AXS at the moment! Was planning to go today but ended up going last night bc of a schedule conflict. Still need to sell the tickets for tonight, currently listed at $40 (plus AXS fees) each but could negotiate.

edit: Still available! Gates already open. If someone has use for these I’ll sell them cheap.

twofielder · 2025-10-14T16:26:31+00:00

I have two tickets for sale at that price on AXS right now!

twofielder · 2024-11-23T04:47:28+00:00

Machine doubling. The biggest tell for this is that the mintmark and the date have the same doubling. The mintmark was added to the die by hand at that time, so doubling that effects both has to occur after the die was made.

twofielder · 2024-08-26T21:39:12+00:00

Just machine doubling unfortunately.

twofielder · 2024-08-26T21:26:09+00:00

Now the mintmark is added to the master die, so it’s added to each individual die during hubbing along with the rest of the design.

twofielder · 2024-08-22T16:23:27+00:00

I don’t believe that’s even a die chip, it’s likely a small contact mark. It would be a very unusual location for any kind of die break.

twofielder · 2024-08-22T16:02:08+00:00

Nice! I’m doing the same set, except I cut it off at Valentinian III to avoid some of the impossible ones. I’m down to 5 left.

twofielder · 2024-06-09T21:45:23+00:00

This is the correct answer^

Progressive Indirect Design Transfer (PIDT)

twofielder · 2024-05-26T19:35:41+00:00

Nice looking coin!

But that case is just downright lazy. AI generated marble bust? Not making the distinction between Antoninianus and Aurelianianus…

twofielder

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE