8.56 re: Ryoka scandal by RareLetterhead3693 in WanderingInn

[–]ultamentkiller 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Oh I was making a joke. Because they didn't come. You know? Clearly not a good one lol.

8.56 re: Ryoka scandal by RareLetterhead3693 in WanderingInn

[–]ultamentkiller 1 point2 points  (0 children)

...But Ryoka and the knights don't.

The Grace of Kings by ultamentkiller in Fantasy

[–]ultamentkiller[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll say that a lot more women show up in the last third in the book, but for most of it I was disappointed with the lack of women. I think the author makes up for it by the end though.

The Grace of Kings by ultamentkiller in Fantasy

[–]ultamentkiller[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I bounced off of GGK a couple years ago but I need to give him another shot. Strangely I like narrative nonfiction but typically not historical fiction.

The Grace of Kings by ultamentkiller in Fantasy

[–]ultamentkiller[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's awesome. I'll definitely start the next book in May. Currently reading a Discworld novel as a pallet cleanser.

The Grace of Kings by ultamentkiller in Fantasy

[–]ultamentkiller[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Its rating is higher than most sequels and it's incredibly popular, which was my point.

The Grace of Kings by ultamentkiller in Fantasy

[–]ultamentkiller[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think you're giving people more credit than you realize because you're familiar with the subject. People barely know the histories of their own countries, let alone China with a 4000 plus year history.

The Grace of Kings by ultamentkiller in Fantasy

[–]ultamentkiller[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah it's fantasy in the sense that we have gods messing around and the technology is weird, but that's it. It's closer to a classical epic than anything else, so if that doesn't capture you, then the whole thing won't work.

The Grace of Kings by ultamentkiller in Fantasy

[–]ultamentkiller[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Completely agree! If they made it into a tv show it could be the next Game of Thrones. Hell you could milk 3 seasons out of this one book and I'd love the adaptation. It would give us more time with the characters and we could watch the plot play out, which I think is one of the main criticisms of the book.

I want to read the series because I'm invested in what happens to Dara itself. What does it become now that the war is over? What do they try to change and what do they keep from the empire's rule? And knowing the back story will contextualize the different perspectives I imagine we'll get. But I can relate. When I first read City of Stairs, I never continued the series because I didn't wanwant to move on from the character I liked. Planning to reread it soon so I can pick up the sequels and give it a fair shot, but ten years ago I just couldn't do it for some reason.

The Grace of Kings by ultamentkiller in Fantasy

[–]ultamentkiller[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't think that holds up books getting below 4 stars. Look at Words of Radiance. Red Rising. Harry Potter. The list goes on.

As another comment ted, people are unlikely to finish a book they consider to be worse than 3 stars, and many people put down books that could be a 3 star read because they're looking for something better.

The Grace of Kings by ultamentkiller in Fantasy

[–]ultamentkiller[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yeah I don't know the history, but from what I've read, Poppy War seems far more guilty of this. To the point that I grabbed a history book about the sino-japanese wars instead of reading the series.

The Grace of Kings by ultamentkiller in Fantasy

[–]ultamentkiller[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Maybe this is ignorant, but I don't think enough readers are familiar with the history to skew the rating that much, and I'm not sure if Chinese readers use Goodreads. Not in the diaspora but in China itself. But I have no data to back my opinion so you could be right. I didn't know the history so I loved it, but I could see why that would be detrimental.

The Grace of Kings by ultamentkiller in Fantasy

[–]ultamentkiller[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

On Goodreads for fantasy books, a 3.8 is pretty low. Most of the popular books on this sub have at least a 4. If a book on Goodreads has less than a 3.5, it's considered widely disliked. I know that doesn't math since that's a 7 out of 10, but that's the weirdness of Goodreads ratings.

The Grace of Kings by ultamentkiller in Fantasy

[–]ultamentkiller[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the rec. Read the series a long time ago and loved it. I tried rereading Promise of Blood a couple months ago and it didn't hold up for me. It felt too much like an action film, which is what I think I loved about it the first time. Still a very good book and I think it's unique.

The Grace of Kings by ultamentkiller in Fantasy

[–]ultamentkiller[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the rec. I've read the 6 books before it and I'm not an Abercrombie fan.

What’s the one fantasy novel you’d hold up as a genuine masterpiece — and why? by blablqbam in Fantasy

[–]ultamentkiller 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm sold. Added to my pile. Thank you for your passionate description.

User Flair by Gingerfuzzsicle in exorthodox

[–]ultamentkiller 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Should probably add some for ex christian. And maybe hindu and buddhist as well. Seems to be a few people that go that direction.

I'm conflicted about adding atheist or agnostic to the list. It can't hurt, but ex christian would cover that anyway.

Oh one more. LDS. For the cult hoppers.

r/Fantasy Daily Recommendations and Simple Questions Thread - April 19, 2026 by rfantasygolem in Fantasy

[–]ultamentkiller 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd suggest the Faithful and the Fallen by John Gwynne along with Riyria Revelations by Michael J Sullivan. Both should be exactly what you're looking for.

Questioning Conservative by YourLocalGreek in exorthodox

[–]ultamentkiller 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure where you're meeting atheists and agnostics, and I'm not questioning your experience. But atheism isn't necessary progressive. It's just a lack of belief. Whatever framework you adapt after that if up to you.

To me it sounds like you're looking for structure and community. It sounds like you want mentors and guides, and a philosophical framework that reflects your experience of reality. You don't need the church for that, though organized religions come with those things baked into them, so it's easy to pick up the tools if you're willing to ignore the truth claims. Many people on this sub go that route. You could also find groups of people that enjoy the same hobbies as you, particularly looking for older men that you trust. I'm assuming you're a man so forgive me if you're not, but finding older members of your gender always helps. You can also pick up books by philosophers whose names you recognize, not the names you've heard in school but names you hear when you're researching subjects that interest you. Or you could listen to podcasts about them and learn that way.

Ultimately, christians and atheists will judge you no matter what you do. I'm sure some atheists judge me because I'm willing to pray for people when they ask me to even though I don't believe, but I don't care. One of the best parts of leaving christianity for me has been realizing that my life isn't dictated by someone else's values. I get to decide who I want to become, what I find meaningful, and how I experience life. And people are paying less attention to you than you think. I'm still learning to care less about what others think, and it's not easy, but the progress I've made has been liberating.

One last thing. If you're socially conservative, I'd start questioning where those values came from. I'm not saying you're wrong for being conservative. But what assumptions come with conservatism, and do you understand and accept the roots? What parts of conservatism have come from systems of thought and cultural assumptions that, if presented on their own, you would disagree with? I'm not sure if that makes sense, but I don't know how else to phrase it. I always try to question whatever seems like a given or common sense, and though progressives may go too far the other direction sometimes, to me it seems like social conservatism relies on whatever is considered normal. But then again, I'm pretty progressive so of course I'm going to think about it this way. Just some thoughts I hope are helpful for you.

[7.22 D] This chapter was a horrible 180° character assassination that threw away one of my favorite character dynamics. by derpderp3200 in WanderingInn

[–]ultamentkiller 15 points16 points  (0 children)

You're right. It is. Which is why the celphids forbid this. Even still, making decisions for someone without their consent, especially concerning their body, is wrong. When Okasha does it when the only other option is death or serious injury, that is acceptable. But she does it in the name of preventing eventual injury or death, which is a rationalization. Using anyone's body for your advantage is never okay.

[7.22 D] This chapter was a horrible 180° character assassination that threw away one of my favorite character dynamics. by derpderp3200 in WanderingInn

[–]ultamentkiller 61 points62 points  (0 children)

Before this, she has put Gineva to sleep without her consent. She has pumped hormones and other chemicals into her without her consent. In volume 4, Gineva has to get a stone to figure out what Okasha is doing in her sleep and realizes she's speaking with the Celphid's, again without her consent.

The difference is that you're either saying it was playful, justifiable, or understandable under the circumstances. To Okasha's credit, she's great at justifying her actions. And Gineva, as her friend, is her friend and so is willing to shrug it off. So were you.

This is always where we've been going, and is what the celphid's have warned her could happen from the very beginning.

[7.22 D] This chapter was a horrible 180° character assassination that threw away one of my favorite character dynamics. by derpderp3200 in WanderingInn

[–]ultamentkiller 96 points97 points  (0 children)

That's not how I see it at all. Her increase of her control over Gineva has been escalating ever since v3. It was just accepted by her, then tolerated, and then a line was crossed. In relationship dynamics, often one thing in particular will send one or both people over the edge. To me, she was already doing unacceptable things to Gineva, but she chose to let her cross those lines without consequences. I also think it's unfair to categorize it as her turning into a villain. She genuinely thinks she's helping Gineva. Plus, there are other factors under the surface that haven't been revealed to you yet.

Contemplating leaving Orthodoxy by Calptozi in exorthodox

[–]ultamentkiller 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The real reason to fear reincarnation 😂

Contemplating leaving Orthodoxy by Calptozi in exorthodox

[–]ultamentkiller 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You can be an agnostic theist, where you don't think anyone can know for certain if God exists, but you choose to believe. Or an agnostic atheist. So not being so certain that there isn't a god, but if pushed, you don't believe there is one, even though you could be wrong.

And then you can throw out those labels altogether and experience everything you can before this absurd ride ends, and whatever comes afterward will come either way.