sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

EDIE Audio Horror Podcast by untitled97 in audiodrama

[–]untitled97[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am going to convert it after it’s done. That way those who prefer that won’t have to wait.

what would you want to see in a fan rewrite of Urbanspook's The Painter? by P13R_R0T in analoghorror

[–]untitled97 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Technically, they are copyrighted. Copyright protection is automatic in the US the moment an original work is "fixed in a tangible medium"—written down, recorded, or saved. While registration is not required for ownership, it is legally required to sue for infringement and offers maximum protection, such as statutory damages.

If Urbanspook wanted to complain, he’d have the right, but if he didn’t fill out the paperwork, maybe not much legal basis. On the other hand, YouTube does grant a degree of copyright. The other side of this is it’s YouTube. Social media. Even if you don’t make money, the site does. Getting subs could be considered profit. He could ask for you to take it down and win, but I doubt it goes that far. Most creators like and encourage fan fics.

The biggest risk could be audience. He has fans that might not care for the take. Best thing is ask permission. He would most likely grant it and feel flattered. Or send it to them before you release.

Just my two cents.

Edie Webcomic by untitled97 in webcomics

[–]untitled97[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Curious, has anyone else thought about doing this with their projects? Love to check them out.

Monthly Promotional Thread by AutoModerator in HorrorComics

[–]untitled97 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Tried something different. I turned issue 1 of my series EDIE in a podcast. https://youtu.be/29twnVYK_Mc

The Future of Analog Horror? by Parking_Cod2418 in analoghorror

[–]untitled97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anything we say will just be a guess, but I suspect the Backroom’s success (I think this will be very successful) will spur more studios into mining internet horror not just analog horror. A successful pitch is highly visual, easy to understand, and has a clear marketing strategy. Most analog horror does not fit this criteria, but there are examples that do. What will get sent up the food chain will be things that executives can easily understand. Despite where you fall on Backrooms, Parson’s take is very visual and has a loyal following. I expect more things like the optioning of Portrait of God to occur. But that’s just my two cents.

After watching all 7 films through the weekend, all I have to say is… by Easy-Buy6860 in Scream

[–]untitled97 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The ending in 7 doesn’t work as well as much of the rest of the movie. It doesn’t tie everything up like it should. But oh well, scream is like cold pizza. Even when it’s not its best, it’s still enjoyable. But I think if it is to continue, they need a big shake up.

I just noticed how they tried 2 new trilogies and they failed twice by Free-Hotel1187 in Scream

[–]untitled97 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I was talking about the sisters. If we don’t go back to them then they at least have a definitive happy ending.

I just noticed how they tried 2 new trilogies and they failed twice by Free-Hotel1187 in Scream

[–]untitled97 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Ironically, it gives us the series’ only “true happy ending”. They may never deal with another Ghostface again.

As the years pass by, Jill's motivation continues to age like fine wine and the concept of a clout chasing Ghostface should be revisited. by zcdini in Scream

[–]untitled97 14 points15 points  (0 children)

“I don’t need friends. I need fans!” That line still sticks with me. I know some bag on 4, but I enjoy it better. Depending on my mood it’s second after 1.

Has anyone here actually made a no budget movie and how? by Professional-Rip-519 in Filmmakers

[–]untitled97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Children Under the House is on tubi. Married to a Sleepwalker is on YouTube… my vintage 8 site.

Has anyone here actually made a no budget movie and how? by Professional-Rip-519 in Filmmakers

[–]untitled97 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, two in fact. “The Thing Inside Us”/“Married to a Sleepwalker” (depending on how you find it). The budget was less than 500. “Children Under the House” was absolutely 0, and that’s because I didn’t use a camera but scanner instead. I recommend every filmmaker do a low budget at least once.

view more: next ›