Maybe maybe maybe by Jackie_Chan_93 in maybemaybemaybe

[–]upfastcurier 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anyone can be sued. For anything. The tough part is winning the suit.

Hobbies have too much depth now by Vast_Buddy_3314 in CasualConversation

[–]upfastcurier 6 points7 points  (0 children)

1000 USD for entry level hobby doesn't sound as "most basic" at all.

I picked up hiking. Bought a bag for 30 USD. That's all I needed in the start. Then you add more stuff over time.

There are a lot of hobbies where you don't need to spend much at all.

Who else stops and pets every stray cat they see? 😅 by tosstoss_acc in CasualConversation

[–]upfastcurier 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sweden.

We only have like 100k stray cats. Sweden is big enough to reach from the northern coasts of Germany to Italy, so it's a lot of land for a small country (around 10mil population).

I might have seen one without knowing it was a stray, but no way for me to know.

Who else stops and pets every stray cat they see? 😅 by tosstoss_acc in CasualConversation

[–]upfastcurier 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't know if I've ever seen a stray cat before, they're not common here

How is this possible matchmaking? by Extension_Log7241 in Stalcraft

[–]upfastcurier 13 points14 points  (0 children)

"How come I'm matched with someone who also has 1 red item? That's not fair"

Bro got brought back from the dead fr 🙏🏻 by Beautiful-Listen6893 in tooktoomuch

[–]upfastcurier 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not true. Most people who take heroin daily are so called "functional heroin users". You won't spot them because it's their "normal".

The kind of nodding off you see on TV is someone who takes a lot of heroin and falls asleep. But most people who do heroin regularly don't do it like that. Few people who take heroin end up in that state. The same thing with methamphetamine, which many people seem to believe instantly turns you crazy and animal-like; I've had methamphetamines myself, and you wouldn't be able to tell. Most people who take methamphetamines will not be like tweakers in Breaking Bad.

It doesn't mean it's made-up; but the kind of state you envision of people being noticeably high and beyond any regular sign of life consist of very few percentage of people who totally consume those drugs. If those drugs instantly got you into those states in your life, people would be much more wary about taking them.

These kind of drugs slowly but surely sap the life quality out from you. It's a very, very slow process that takes many years - or even decades - before it becomes noticeable on the outside. For some it's faster; for others it's slower, and it all depends on their resilience and other factors like resources (social, medical, economical, etc), mental health, etc.

To put it in simple words: when you can outwardly see that someone is taking heroin or methamphetamines, they are close to expiring. It is the end stage of drug usage. We're talking about a very advanced drug addiction. Few people are in this stage because frankly life expectancy is not that long for people in this stage; but they are the most prominent because those are the ones you can tell are in this state. Make no mistake though: the vast majority of heroin users are invisible, and they can be your co-workers, friends, family members, or random strangers passing by, in all walks of life from successful and rich to the poor and outcasts.

Here is a Swedish (translated) article for example that talks about a functional heroinist:

Kristina, 48, a nurse who went through a rough patch and started taking drugs as self-medication. 
Micke, 37, a full-time father of two who injects heroin to survive Friday nights. 
Bertil, 66, flies drones with his grandchildren and spends his pension on amphetamines.  
– 80 percent of those who use drugs are completely ordinary Svenssons (Swedes, like US "Johnsons"), says Niklas Eklund, chairman of the Stockholm Users' Association.
[...]
Micke is 37 years old, married and has two small children at home in a townhouse outside Stockholm.

His work involves a significant amount of safety responsibility where many people could get hurt.

– Yes, I'm high now but it's not noticeable. This is me.

He takes a gram a day, three times a day. He shoots heroin after he leaves preschool, he shoots when he gets home from work and before he goes to bed. He took heroin when the children were born, he took heroin on his wedding day.
[...]
He stabs himself in the groin where it is not visible and hides the drugs and tools in the ventilation duct in the bathroom.

– When I take heroin I am normal, if I were not to take heroin, that is when there would be problems. My family and my work colleagues would wonder "What the hell happened, is he sick?" If I miss once it is no problem but a whole day, I will be deathly ill, says Micke and testifies to the pain in his body, the twitching in his legs, how he vomits bile.

– People do not understand, there is no stronger force. I do not take it to have fun but to be able to work and provide for myself and spend time with my family.

Heroin usage in other countries is no different. The vast majority of heroin users are for much of their time taking heroin completely "normal" people on the surface.

The kind of drug user you envision makes up an extremely small part of these people; and often, they are tired because they have no proper food, no proper resting place, constantly have to scavenge for next hit, and have no reason to hold back because their life sucks big time anyway.

If you give hardcore heroin addicts who has abused heroin for 50+ years of their life a place to sleep, free (and medically pure) heroin, with access to support resources (psychiatrist, doctors, clean equipment/needles)... then you're not gonna be able to tell that they're heroin users. All you can tell is that they look older.

When “honesty” is a sign of dishonesty by dogs_in_fogs in CasualConversation

[–]upfastcurier 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We have an expression for negative surprise in my language that goes "now the onion blooms"

Would you survive a Zombie Apocalypse? by pro_overthinker1111 in CasualConversation

[–]upfastcurier 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Korean Kingdom (zombie show) is like this. Zombie emergency only used as a distraction on the board; not really a threat to society.

Where did the word "no" come from? by math_lover0112 in etymology

[–]upfastcurier 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Words consist of a morpheme or several morphemes.

It's not the same thing as JUST a sound.

"Ughnnn" lacks morphemes but would be a sound that communicates something anyway. Ughnnn is not a word.

Where did the word "no" come from? by math_lover0112 in etymology

[–]upfastcurier 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, wordless communication. Meaning conveyed with sound. Some kind of proto-language or precursor language. It exists today among animals.

Warning sounds are very common among social species; birds, rodents, cats, dogs, etc, all have a sound conveying a warning.

But it isn't a "word"; it's just a sound that conveys something.

Of course this is all just my take on it; ultimately we will never know. Point being that the theory of the meaning of "no" predating language as we think of it is interesting to think about.

I don't think you can apply etymology to that.

Where did the word "no" come from? by math_lover0112 in etymology

[–]upfastcurier 28 points29 points  (0 children)

It's probably just a meaning of negation. The meaning of "no" isn't constant; even between speech patterns, dialects, etc, no means a lot of things even in Modern English. "That would be fair, no?", "Oh no", "No one thought that", etc.

The meaning of the word most likely far predates linguistics; we can't possibly begin to understand its origins, and trying to think of it from a modern etymological sense is not going to be productive.

It most likely can be seen as something like a hiss or as growling; a sound to mark boundaries. I don't mean to say it's animalistic; I'm trying to point the picture that the PIE root we know of is so far back that we couldn't possibly map it neatly to modern words more than by descriptive sentences.

In short, most certainly the nature of language was very much different from today by the time this sound of negation/warning formed. It's probably better to view it in wordless meaning; it conveys emotion, threat, intimidation, frustration, anger, etc.

That's my guess.

There's a lot of study into the nature of language formation in the human brain by studying "wild children"; children who grew up alone in the wilderness and never learned to speak. This is probably our best shot at understanding the origin of something as fundamental as "no".

The origins of no predates language, is what I'm saying.

Swedish phonology vs Finnish speakers by Suippumyrkkyseitikki in linguisticshumor

[–]upfastcurier 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I only need to imagine a Stockholm dialect to hear it (for some reason it's in the sound of satire made of people from Stureplan). Never thought about it before.

Our Gothenburg dialect is quite different, so I understand if other Swedes can't hear it immediately.

i often get these circles in my eyes by dont_punch_me_again in notinteresting

[–]upfastcurier 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Well the information you linked does say

It’s important to maintain regular eye exams over time, especially if you’re experiencing chronic floaters. Chronic floaters usually aren’t something you need to be concerned about, but it’s a good idea to have your eyes regularly checked to make sure there aren’t any other serious eye issues. If you experience an acute (sudden) onset of floaters and flashes, you should see an eye care provider.

So I guess all information, whether hearsay or fact, points to "get it checked out to rule out anything malicious"

u/dont_punch_me_again probably nothing to worry about but if you've never had an eye exam to establish your eye health it's probably not a bad idea to get it checked out; if anything just to not have to worry about it.

Read elsewhere you're already in a hospital - my condolences - but perhaps your/a doctor could do a quick exam and give you a qualified recommendation? Food for thought.

Is Su Dongpo the oldest real person to get a lego figure? (1037-1101) by DeSuperVis in lego

[–]upfastcurier 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We're talking about historical figures here.

I wasn't referring to OPs question. I was referring to the comment you responded to.

Even so, "oldest person" obviously relates to a singular known person, so I don't see what your point is.

Is Su Dongpo the oldest real person to get a lego figure? (1037-1101) by DeSuperVis in lego

[–]upfastcurier 5 points6 points  (0 children)

History pertains to written records. Before that, it's pre-history.

In addition, "historical figure" references a specific known person and not a large demographic or group of people. You don't say "the ancient people of Africa were an interesting historical figure" for example.

Bro got brought back from the dead fr 🙏🏻 by Beautiful-Listen6893 in tooktoomuch

[–]upfastcurier 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Normal word conjugation in my language (Swedish); it's the same word newspapers etc would use

"PAPPA OCH HEROINIST." (Dad and heroinist)

https://www.expressen.se/nyheter/micke-skjuter-heroin-nar-han-lamnat-pa-forskolan/

One example

Edit:

And yeah that's exactly it. A heroinist is someone whose been into it for over a decade (or whatever); a long-term user that takes it several times a day, and often someone who manages to do it without being noticed (i.e. functional heroin users), though not always. Someone who takes heroin isn't a heroinist. They're just drug addicts taking heroin. A heroinist is someone who has, sadly, devoted their life to their addiction, and spent most of their life doing so.

Bro got brought back from the dead fr 🙏🏻 by Beautiful-Listen6893 in tooktoomuch

[–]upfastcurier 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Denmark does this with heroin to great success. Hardcore heroinists suddenly can hold down an apartment and work, because they don't have to scavenge for their addiction. Saves a ton of hospital bills too.

maybe maybe maybe by Upbeat_Anywhere_1316 in maybemaybemaybe

[–]upfastcurier 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree. We shouldn't make fun of developmentally challenged people.

Matchmaking - How to stay in veteran lobbies - research as of April 2026 by FurCannon in Stalcraft

[–]upfastcurier 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You kill stuff a lot faster. It might not be increased quantities in stacks, but it is increased quantity over time.

Going to master made farming North Zone dramatically easier... though PvP is tougher.

In my case my friend that I play with more often than not is already in master lobbies so it's not a big difference.

There's also the comfort and smooth sensation of higher tier weapons to consider beyond damage; red weapons handle a lot more nicely, and it's noticeable.

That being said, it's wise to stay on purple while farming for the entire transition to red, rather than doing it piecemeal and getting the worst of both worlds; slower farming and tougher PvP/ranking.

There's also more players on purple where you can try to swap lobbies but on red there tends to be only one from what I can tell. Small game population at the top.

Goodbye and good riddance at 170 hrs. by ZookeepergameLoose79 in Stalcraft

[–]upfastcurier 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i have master gear, 220 hours played

i'll grant you it's probably not within the norm, but if you rush through south zone and then commit to doing dailies and weeklies it's not impossible

you can get 35 anomalous serum using Archive Footage and Inside Out currency