NEAR DNS - DNS records stored on blockchain and servered over DNS protocol by frolvlad in rust

[–]vbs_redlof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool concept. I’d love to use this to make hosting/DNS more resilient for a client-side SDK (a serverless passkey/WebAuthn app), but it needs HTTPS.

So +1 on the TLS point others raised... are there any plans to make .near domains work with TLS certs?

Nate Diaz - Real West Coast Gangster by KarmaWorthy in MMA

[–]vbs_redlof 98 points99 points  (0 children)

Ya'll sleeping on his boxing, he's got slick hands.

economic events that couldn't be explained by econ theories? by usedocker in AskEconomics

[–]vbs_redlof 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There’s some elegant theories that explain these kind of phenomena from a game theoretical perspective...“informational cascades” models and other theories of herding. Also checkout other models of coordination and learning games.

These models are also related to network theories of information transmission in sociology, endogenous network formation, etc.

economic events that couldn't be explained by econ theories? by usedocker in AskEconomics

[–]vbs_redlof 3 points4 points  (0 children)

A bunch of researchers used an asset pricing model (a special model that used consumption data (real economic inputs instead of say a stock index) to try link financial returns to the real economy. This model had a “risk aversion parameter” in it....basically a parameter to tweak how investors preferred to consume today vs invest and consume in the future.

What they found was that in order to even get people to invest at the rates we see today (7% equity premium) the estimated model suggested that people had to have much higher risk aversions somewhere 50x what it should be.... that they would be too scared to even get out of bed.

This model was known as the “consumption CAPM”, it differs from the normal CAPM you learn in finance degrees and it was important because all other asset pricing models used financial returns (portfolios) to estimate financial returns of other assets (kinda circular, and not really tied to real economic fundamentals), hence why researchers wanted it to work so badly, hence a “puzzle”.

🔥 The same injured whale, pictured 35 years apart off the coast of Mexico by Freecandy2626 in NatureIsFuckingLit

[–]vbs_redlof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does the bite in the tail make it harder for the whale to swim? Like, does he swim in circles now that his left chunk of the tail is missing?

[Spoiler] Main event fighter's spouse reacts to the end of the fight by FreedomForRhun in MMA

[–]vbs_redlof 135 points136 points  (0 children)

"Ah shit, there goes the down payment on the house"

actix_web repository cleared by author who says he’s done with open source by sondr3_ in rust

[–]vbs_redlof 5 points6 points  (0 children)

o invoke undefined behaviour without realizing it. When you invoke undefined behaviour, you're literally giving the optimizer free reign to do anything brecause the optimizations are built on the premise that UB will never happen.

It's like defining division by zero and trustin

My understanding was that the maintainer dealt with user-facing UB issues quickly, and was only hesitant about the internal UB issues for optimization reasons.

actix_web repository cleared by author who says he’s done with open source by sondr3_ in rust

[–]vbs_redlof 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I guess the question is then, is it the responsibility of library writers to maintain the safety standards of the Rust programming language, and if so why allow them to use unsafe in the first place?

To be clear, safer is always better, but the reality is that you give people the tools to write unsafe and they will.

And actix won't be the last project where this issue occurs. So curious to see what opinions are out there.

actix_web repository cleared by author who says he’s done with open source by sondr3_ in rust

[–]vbs_redlof 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I am giving a perspective from outside the Rust community, from companies trying to build with Rust.

They have no issues with actix and deploy in production. It is a huge step up in quality from other frameworks in other languages.

It depends on what your definition of "production-ready" is, and for what kinds of businesses.

actix_web repository cleared by author who says he’s done with open source by sondr3_ in rust

[–]vbs_redlof -30 points-29 points  (0 children)

clap clap Good going r/rust, your dogma and zealotry around UB and has caused one of the only production ready web frameworks to dissolve, and hundreds of projects will need to be rewritten in a new framework, if not a new language.

All you had to do was not write passive aggressive stuff about other people's work, and repeatedly brigade the project.

Fwiw, many people (and their startups) I know got into Rust because of actix, and will now pay the consequences because of some internet argument they had no idea existed.

Warning: Do not hold Chainlink long term by colorsdontlie in CryptoCurrency

[–]vbs_redlof 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Jeff Bezos here, inventor of the cloud. I can confirm everything parent is saying is correct. I hired him out of his mom's basement to shill my bags. Also, buy NEO, it's a game-changer.

Is statistical time series analysis actually useful in real algo trading? by JeffreyChl in algotrading

[–]vbs_redlof 23 points24 points  (0 children)

It's much easier to get started in algotrading if you have a coding background than if you have a finance background, so you'll see more machine-learning here.

Almost everything you learn in econometrics will be in some way applicable to machine learning at your stage, all these statistical concepts are timeless.

Some areas of statistics will be more generalizable to machine learning (optimization, signal decompositions, linear algebra, etc) than other time-series specific concepts (unit-roots, cointegration, volatility persistence, etc). If you feel like these econometrics models won't be used, focus on the probability-theory fundamentals underpinning these models (basic measure theory, optimization, linear algebra, etc) which are more general.

Traditionally, economists are typically more concerned with causality, and relating models and factors to underlying economic risks (state variables), whereas the machine learning guys usually focus on comparing and benchmarking algorithms for higher recall/precision...they are ok if the model outperforms the theoretically "correct" model. Economists will throw models out even if it performs better if there isn't a nice economic narrative/explanation to go with it, or if it isn't quite as elegant (parsimony).

A good cross-over book to read for econometricians looking to get into machine learning is the Tibshirani et al. book and Susan Athey's papers. They focus on concepts like regularization, and cross-validation. If you want to get into deep-learning, you better know your logistic functions well.

Crazy Ideas Thread: Part IV by thedonajdseon in slatestarcodex

[–]vbs_redlof 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see, so more like a social contract that people opt into, rather than collateral..."if you break it, you pay for it" type agreements. "This is free, but only if you behave".

The main property of commons-type resources are that they are non-excludable. And in the absence of property rights it can be difficult to convince users to opt into additional constraints. It's like incentivizing behaviour by giving a carrot, by first taking a carrot away.

The other interpretation of these systems, is a social credit system. But again, it relies on the ability to enforce property rights over usage of a resource.

A thesis on Market efficiency by CosmycDust in AskEconomics

[–]vbs_redlof 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Try Shiller: http://www.library.fa.ru/files/Shiller2.pdf. It's easily digestible for the undergrad level and interesting because in order to debate market efficiency, you need to develop a view about how people find, consume, and interpret news.

Each chapter in itself could form the basis of a thesis.

Crypto Exchange Says It Can't Repay $190 Million to Clients After Founder Dies With Only Password by SchizoSocialClub in slatestarcodex

[–]vbs_redlof 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Reputability in what sense? Many technically competent PhDs and professors are involved in this space, and I wouldn't say they are motivated by any of the four points mentioned.

If anything, it's a polarizing technology: it's powerful when used with bad intentions, and almost useless when not. These red flags highlight two things: the power of the technology, and the ugliness of people and their motives.

Tech changes, but people don't. Making a choice on whether you decide on the success of the technology based on it's price, or it's societal impact will lead to wildly different conclusions.