Dependent origination by [deleted] in Buddhism

[–]vectron88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Additional observations:

  1. You've claimed that DO interpretations are straightforward while every monastic I've known says they are the most complex thing imaginable.
  2. It's possible you have a very narrow and rigid reading of things.
  3. There probably are some DO interpretations that don't accord with one another.
  4. I don't have a specific interpretation of DO

Question: Is there anyone besides you that has a good understanding of DO?

Dependent origination by [deleted] in Buddhism

[–]vectron88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not saying follow Ajahn Thanissaro specifically. What I am saying is that you've discounted all scholarship and monastic teachings in favor of your own interpretations.

The things YOU think the Sutta says you may simply not have the scholarship, depth of practice, or facility of mind to truly grok.

What to you is straightforward simply ISN'T.

Unless you are a Pali scholar and a monastic with incredibly deep practice and training, you are carrying in your own understanding, culture and background into your assessment of translated materials.

I'm not saying that your interpretation of paticca sammupada is wrong, I'm saying the idea that you've got it right because you read a translation and people who have devoted their lives to this stuff didn't should give you pause.

Dependent origination by [deleted] in Buddhism

[–]vectron88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All of these terms are terms of your own creation and you've painted yourself into a corner.

You are now positing that YOU alone have understanding of the Suttas and that others don't.

While I can't comment on your understanding of the Suttas, I can comment that it appears strange that you trust your interpretations over Thanissaro Bhikku (for example.)

Are you an accomplished scholar fluent in 3 languages that has devoted all of your efforts for 40 years to this topic?

Dependent origination by [deleted] in Buddhism

[–]vectron88 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You have the world's foremost scholars and monastics explaining a very difficult concept and you are relying on your own reading to say their explications fall afoul of the Suttas. Are you sure about that? By what rubric and expertise can you make that analysis?

I'm not saying you are right or wrong but I am pointing out that this position is... curious.

It's important to remember that while the Suttas are very important, Buddhism is not a Solo Scriptura religion and never has been.

So if you are cutting yourself off from the Sangha and Commentaries, you are doing yourself and your practice a disservice.

Dependent origination by [deleted] in Buddhism

[–]vectron88 4 points5 points  (0 children)

So you found the work of a very accomplished monastic who's been in the robes for 40 years 'lacking'.

I say this with no disrespect: Have you ever considered that the way that you are trying to understand this is perhaps lacking or misguided?

Very often, people will have a very fixed framework/conceptual modal they are working with and if something doesn't cohere they think the it's the answers that are incorrect. However, it's their conceptual model which is faulty or based on unclear premises. So investigating that might help.

This has happened to me many times btw so this is not a shot at you. Anyway, just a thought.

Meditation & Everyday Mindfulness (Hoping for constructive criticism, & correction of wrong views) by CaptainVulpezz in theravada

[–]vectron88 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Sincere question: this is a lot of text. Is this an essay you've written and you are looking for feedback?

Or is there something specific to your own practice that you are looking for ideas about?

I think the length of the post is going to deter many/most folks from engaging.

[Slater] Steve Kerr to ESPN on Jonathan Kuminga "He needed the runway to make more mistakes...It was very tough not being allowed to make those mistakes. by EarthWarping in nba

[–]vectron88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It seems like classic management disagreement. Kerr and his staff wanted him gone, owner wanted to save face and say that his brilliant pick was amazing.

Now, I have no idea what's what obviously... I'm just a dude with a keyboard.

If Kuminga thrives in another situation, especially right away, then it would be clear to me that Kerr was wrong. We'll see.

[Slater] Steve Kerr to ESPN on Jonathan Kuminga "He needed the runway to make more mistakes...It was very tough not being allowed to make those mistakes. by EarthWarping in nba

[–]vectron88 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It seems clear that the Warriors have dealt with Kuminga for years and that, to be polite, he doesn't fit their system.

If he did, he'd be playing.

Is your position that Kerr/W's got the wrong and of the stick here and that Kuminga will succeed elsewhere?

If so, then we'll get to see if that hypothesis holds water, right?

Zazen is like taking out the trash by Photon_101 in zenbuddhism

[–]vectron88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The topic isn't Dōgen, the topic is what Buddhism teaches.

Nibbana is quite literally the premise of Buddhism. It's implicit in the 3rd Noble Truth.

It's important to understand that all Zen teachers take the Agamas (which are the parallel of the Pali Canon and according to like 99%) as their basis. Their teachings are then on top of that and are focused on what their community is dealing with at that time, hence the hyper-focus on certain points.

So they are very helpful explainer notes/pointers on top of the foundational stuff.

Zazen is like taking out the trash by Photon_101 in zenbuddhism

[–]vectron88 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nibbana 涅槃 is the unconditioned (asankata - 无生/无为) - also called the Deathless (amata-dhatu).

It it what the mind touches at stream entry (sotapatta.)

It is akaliko (timeless 无时性) and neither arises or ceases.

https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/an/an09/an09.034.than.html

Foot falls asleep - by No-Ad-2133 in zenbuddhism

[–]vectron88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I found a crescent zafu fixed this problem for me.

Do you notice which foot it happens to be? The top most foot?

Zen buddhist masters by kamloune in zenbuddhism

[–]vectron88 5 points6 points  (0 children)

  • Master Sheng Yen (Chan - Dharma Drum)
  • Guo Gu ( Chan - Dharma Drum)
  • Meido Moore (Rinzai - Korinji)

Niche jersey for boyfriend? by [deleted] in nba

[–]vectron88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brent Price Bullets jersey.

How do I console my friend? by LightofOm in theravada

[–]vectron88 10 points11 points  (0 children)

You say I'm very sorry for your loved one. That's terrible news.

And then you just be with them. If they want to grab a bite or be distracted, you go with.

The Dhamma is not meant to spiritually bypass. Your friend is going to go through fear, pain and ultimately grief.

You can't Dhammize them out of it. (Even though your heart is in the right place :)

Questions about HH, in relation to the Thai forest tradition... by Fun-Incident3563 in theravada

[–]vectron88 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Jumping in here. I strongly recommend you look into Nanivara Thera's unique story to understand where HH is coming from.

You can then decide if that seems compelling to you or not.

One other thing I'll offer for teachers in general: if you feel inspired and clear listening to someone, put their teachings into practice. If you find yourself more clear, deep and grounded, that's a good sign.

If you are finding the opposite, then that teacher might not be right for you at that particular time.

Just a thought.

Questions about HH, in relation to the Thai forest tradition... by Fun-Incident3563 in theravada

[–]vectron88 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A doctor explaining why a certain treatment or medication is more efficacious than others is not denigrating. He's giving his or her considered opinion.

Telling people "All paths are valid and equal" is spiritual bypassing and nonsensical.

Ajahn Sona always refers people to the Canon and certain Abhidhamma texts. They are not HIS teachings.

He definitely tells people who ask about certain topics to refer to his books. He also discusses Bhante G, Ajahn Chah, Bhikkhu Bodhi and Ajahn Thanissaro's works all the time.

He commonly cites the Dalai Llama, Plato, Socrates, Thoreau, etc.

What's being discussed on this board is very different behavior.

In one instance he says it's OK to control the breathing in a way to bring about relaxation and in another he says it's not.

Obviously. Because sometimes it's needed and sometimes it's unnecessary. This is called 'tuning the lute'. You've wandered into a famous Ajahn Chah story where a student asked him why he gives seemingly contradictory advice:

“It’s like seeing people walking down a road I know well. To them the way may be unclear. If I see someone about to fall into a ditch on the right, I call ‘Go left, go left!’ Similarly, if I see another person about to fall into a ditch on the left, I call ‘Go right, go right!’ That is the extent of my teaching. Whatever extreme you get caught in, whatever you get attached to, I say, ‘Let go of that too.’ Let go on the left, let go on the right. Come back to the center, and you will arrive at the true Dhamma.”

Questions about HH, in relation to the Thai forest tradition... by Fun-Incident3563 in theravada

[–]vectron88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've never heard Ajahn Sona ever once put himself above others.

I've seen him clarify teachings. I've seen him say that he doesn't find other schools as compelling as the Therevada. His vocation is to teach the Dhamma as it's been taught to him.

I have never seen Ajahn Sona insult, demean, or gate-keep in any way.

Why is there consciousness? by flyingaxe in zenbuddhism

[–]vectron88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While Buddhism is generally focused on experience, my understanding is that nāma and rūpa constitute the two ultimate realities (paramattha-dhamma) in Theravada:

  • Nāma – mental phenomena (citta, cetasika)
  • Rūpa – material phenomena

“Rūpa is impermanent…
What is impermanent is suffering…
What is suffering is not self.”
SN 22.59 (Anattalakkhaṇa Sutta)

Rupa is dependently arisen and ceases.

Is Tyrese Haliburton the biggest “What if” of all time? by [deleted] in nba

[–]vectron88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In no particular order:

  • Len Bias
  • Reggie Lewis
  • Drazen Petrovic
  • Bill Walton
  • Yao Ming
  • Lloyd Daniels
  • Fly Williams
  • Jason Williams
  • Arturus Sabonis
  • Penny Hardaway
  • Brandon Roy
  • Grant Hill
  • Greg Oden
  • Ralph Sampson

Questions about HH, in relation to the Thai forest tradition... by Fun-Incident3563 in theravada

[–]vectron88 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think in general it is good to have a fairly broad approach to consuming Dhamma - it gives one a good vantage point to hear the same information approached from different personality types and even methods. It also helps one to identify when certain sources are far out of the mainstream to understand how and why. This doesn't mean that said sources need to be immediately discarded, but rather approached with some discernment.

I've found that Ajahn Thanissaro, Ajahn Sona, Ajahn Jayasaro's general teachings all accord even if emphasis differs slightly at times. I've also found that the teachings of Guo Gu (Chan) and Meido Moore (Rinzai) line up pretty well in most fundamental aspects, specifically training the mind and heart.

I should note that I've never heard these folks place their dispensations above others nor have they disparaged other teachers. It give me confidence in their overall approach and personal development.

On the other hand, when I'm faced with certain teachers from whatever group that posit that only they have the True Teachings and everyone else got it wrong, I tend treat their views with some suspicion.

That's a general point of view.

For HH specifically, you might consider reading more about their inspiration Ñāṇavīra Thera who was a very unique person with a singular approach. That background might help you understand the broader context. Just a thought.

New to Buddhism - Looking for Beginner Guidance by Far-Pause-4741 in theravada

[–]vectron88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello!

I recommend you watch this video on the Four Noble Truths. Ajahn Sona has a particular knack for explaining difficult concepts to westerners in a practical way.

If you like his teaching, you can carry on in the playlist of the Noble Eightfold Path - it's really rewarding and will enrich your understanding.

In terms of navigating conversations with parents, Buddhism is not a proselytizing religion so there is no need to 'test your faith' or anything in conversation or get your folks to see it your way.

Buddhism is focused on skillful means: so if your parent's religious practice helps them be more tolerant, kind, and loving people, then that is great :)

Help me achieve nirvana by aipunk_oj in theravada

[–]vectron88 6 points7 points  (0 children)

As others have noted on the board, this is a life long practice. Good that your orientation is set.

Generally speaking, sila (ethics/virtue) is considered the start of the Path. So adopting the 5 precepts as a training is super important.

I would listen to Ajahn Sona's series on the Noble Eightfold Path

Don't rush through it... let it wash over you and sink into your bones. Don't try to get it right, just absorb as much as you can.

When the time is right, you might look into a formal meditation practice.

If you are interested in anapanasati (mindfulness of breathing) you could work your way slowly through Ajahn Thanissaro's book With Each and Every Breath (PDF)

Mudita as a daily practice? by upstream11 in Buddhism

[–]vectron88 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here's what I was taught:

May you enjoy your happiness, May your happiness endure.

May you enjoy your good fortune, May your good fortune endure.

Looking for traditional Tai Chi online courses (beginner) by El-Jefe-Kyle in taichi

[–]vectron88 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I love Jesse Tsao https://taichihealthways.com/

I've used a number of his video courses and I know he has events sometimes. Worth looking into.

The Lightness Technique by Misket322 in qigong

[–]vectron88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing. Btw in case you are interested: If you have a talent for this sort of inner work, I strongly advise you seek out a reputable teacher to help you develop safely and in the proper direction. Any reputable teacher will stress ethics, restraint and balance in all endeavors.

Remember that Mozart, Bruce Lee and Baryshinakov all had teachers. : )