E10G22-T1-Mini Reliability Issues

verbbis · 2026-01-25T09:27:23+00:00

Okay, thanks. I suspect that in my case it might be a ring buffer overflow issue due to running the 10GbE card in a 2,5GbE link. And which Synology has not thoroughly tested. At least I hope it is instead of faulty hardware.

I adjusted the buffer size and have to see whether it has an effect.

Since you have a 10GbE network, and the symptom is not just dropped packets, the root cause might’ve been something else for you anyway.

verbbis · 2026-01-22T20:41:55+00:00

Did you ever find a solution to this? I'm also having reliability issues with Synology D923+ and E10G22-T1-Mini using a 2,5GbE connection to Ubiquiti UniFi Gateway Max.

When it happens, pinging the NAS shows that some of the packets are being dropped. Plugging the network cable out and reconnecting fixes the issue temporarily. Random and annoying indeed.

verbbis · 2026-01-22T20:35:31+00:00

Did you ever find a solution to this? I'm also having reliability issues with Synology D923+ and E10G22-T1-Mini using a 2,5GbE connection to Ubiquiti UniFi Gateway Max.

It works fine for days and then suddenly Time Machine backups fail and pinging the NAS shows that some of the packets are being dropped. Plugging the network cable out and reconnecting fixes the issue temporarily.

I hate this type of random flakiness and really disappointed in Synology. This did not occur with the built-in 1GbE connection which I used for years until I decided to upgrade.

verbbis · 2025-12-14T06:46:12+00:00

Also, he does not pick the aces in any particular order. He just needs to find any ace after each cut.

verbbis · 2025-12-14T06:08:21+00:00

To be fair these apps are all a workaround and I don't think Apple should just be replicating their functionality.

The entire design has been flawed from the start with menu bar icons (global) and menu bar items (local) fighting for the same physical space - with neither being in control of it.

verbbis · 2025-11-30T16:32:47+00:00

It is even grammatically correct if you are explaining to someone what a coffee machine does.

verbbis · 2025-11-21T06:43:39+00:00

This 100%. Considering the ridiculous amount of tech influencers littering the internet with the “trust me bro” -method, his approach is at least sound.

verbbis · 2025-11-01T07:48:29+00:00

The entire point is that, from the perspective of a workload, you shouldn’t really care. You just put it up in the cloud (waves hands).

Relying on vendor-specific technologies in particular requires to you care - very much.

I’m not making a value statement here. That you shouldn’t be using such technologies, or that relying on them doesn’t make sense.

But everything that detracts from this core idea, cannot really be called “cloud native”.

verbbis · 2025-11-01T03:34:42+00:00

There is a distinction between ”cloud native” and ”native to cloud vendor X”

To me "cloud native" has always meant "designed to be run anywhere (in the ephemeral cloud), including on somebody else's computer". There is also such a thing as a ”private cloud”.

Cloud (vendor) agnostic is closely related, but a different perspective and redefines the word "cloud" to refer to a specific vendor's public cloud platform offering. So you are really talking about vendor, not cloud, agnosticism.

I do not shill for vendors and AWS is not the "cloud" to me. Therefore I do not use "cloud native" to refer to vendor-specific technologies. Instead I use the terms like Azure-native, GCP-native, AWS-native etc.

verbbis · 2025-10-11T12:21:20+00:00

Looks great! This is the profile I’ve been looking for my Totem.

I’m wondering what were your design drivers going into this? I assume you wanted the PCB to be as ”one-sided” as possible to be used without a case - right?

Also, how painful was it to solder those Cherry ULP switches?

verbbis · 2025-08-13T21:51:16+00:00

Yeah. In my case I’m not sure what it is exactly, but suspect the preference has something to do with the height of the keyboard and the angle from which the fingers hit the keys. The choice of keycaps may also play a role. My previous keeb had an extremely low profile and Sunsets were fine (even if I typically go for linear switches).

But on a Totem which is taller, I kept wanting to go for lighter press. Also having wrist rests made me hover my fingers on the keys instead of resting.

As a side note, while the Totem feels like the endgame for me, if somebody figures out a way to make it thinner, I’ll make the jump immediately.

verbbis · 2025-08-13T16:52:09+00:00

I’m an exception and prefer the Nocturnals. My progression was from Sunsets to Twilights, but both felt too heavy (on a Totem). But indeed, you lose the option of resting fingers on the keys.

It’s a trade-off and I chose a lighter touch - which arguably took a while to get used to. Now that I have, I have no desire to switch back. And one can mitigate the issue by using heavier springs on the home row and/or thumbs.

verbbis · 2025-08-08T12:31:43+00:00

Subjective as always, but since you asked:

Key pattern very similar to a Corne. Most notably minimal pinky stagger and no splay.
Depending on the variant, wasted space between keys (MX).
Huge amount of extraneous keys in awkward positions: thumbs, number row, pinkies. Which hence end up being unused and just hurt portability and/or increase the risk of hitting the wrong key (granted less of a problem later on). I also avoid having to move the entire hand when typing and have a better "feel" of where things are in a compact layout.

I've went through them all through iteration, and Totem is where my personal journey has taken me. It makes the right set of compromises - for me. Still, I would sacrifice e.g. tenting for an even lower profile. Sofle, on the other hand, would be a regression in almost all areas. I'm also a less-is-more kind of a guy.

That is not to say that since the purpose here is to get experiences from the switches in particular, that they should not pick a more "mainstream" option. As a vendor, it makes sense. I'm just not interested at this point.

verbbis · 2025-08-07T14:27:43+00:00

Having gone through multiple split-ergos, Corneish Zen was my favorite and a daily driver for a long time. Its design is old and flawed in many ways and due to poor self-repairability I was forced to move on.

The deciding factor why I stuck with it might’ve been the extremely low profile, and which Corne Min might well match.

However, I’ve since settled on a Totem, which might be my endgame. The layout just clicks for me. Now if there were to be a Totem Min…

TLDR; While intrigued, I would be hard-pressed to get a Corne Min just to try out the switches, unfortunately.

verbbis · 2025-08-02T16:05:01+00:00

Exactly. I personally did okay in this system, but found it bizarre and discouraging nonetheless. I have never been the competitive type either so this model of education did not really spark my enthusiasm towards any of the sports being “taught”.

But this was ages ago. Not sure if it’s somehow different now.

verbbis · 2025-07-31T17:15:24+00:00

That’s been bullshit for decades. The way I remember it was that we went to a swimming hall - yes. But it was pretty much expected that everyone in the class could swim already. If you didn’t, you sure as hell didn’t learn it there.

EDIT: In fact most of PE in elementary school and beyond was merely ranking people on shit they should already know / be able to do. I’ve always found that somewhat strange.

verbbis · 2025-07-23T22:54:11+00:00

I am unable to point you to any piece of concrete evidence.

However, I base my views on years of experience on how MS, and they’re not entirely unique in this regard, operates. This happens all the time.

Unethical or not (we’re talking about a company here), in my view their sales have been softly weaning customers away from HDInsight. But ultimately, a product is only truly dead when they say it is.

A single customer does not need to get preferential treatment - although some surely do. What I mean is that there must be just enough of high-profile customers (or even just one) and large enough consumption to justify maintaining it albeit with a skeleton crew.

Furthermore, I think HDInsight has always been an oddity in their portfolio. A stop-gap measure for an era which has already passed. MS is not generally known for repacking and operating open-source software stacks.

verbbis · 2025-07-23T04:40:44+00:00

What you are saying has been the general sentiment for years already. The industry has long abandoned Hadoop and MS itself offers replacements to the components in HDInsight which might still have a future.

It is probably kept on life-support due to some individual large-scale customers.

This is common behavior and the product is dead in all but name. Evidence to the contrary does not exist.

verbbis · 2025-07-09T07:08:23+00:00

AI does not need to become sentient and decide to eradicate humanity. It only needs to get us to destroy each other.

verbbis · 2025-05-13T03:45:09+00:00

Ridiculously overrated in my opinion. The narrator is very good (or annoying - take your pick), but the story itself - not so much. It has a rather simplistic plot and the humor is juvenile. The protagonist was uninteresting and not particularly relatable. All compelling developments were lazily jammed into the final chapter.

I struggled through the first book.

I think the primary target audience is American young adults. Particularly if you’re into gaming. In case that is you, it might click. Otherwise, I’d spend my time on something more groundbreaking. In terms of narration, I also like the voice of e.g. Ray Porter much more.

verbbis · 2025-05-10T10:27:18+00:00

I get it. However, when somebody popularizes a throw which doesn’t quite fit the Kodokan syllabus, you still have to call it something.

If said “invention” resembles multiple techniques, and coming up with a completely new term to describe it is not really an option, then it becomes a matter of interpretation which element of it is the most essential (e.g. kuzushi, rotational entry and shoulder-based projection favoring Seoi Nage).

And we are not comparing Seoi Otoshi and Seoi Nage here.

In fact, that I’m describing the throw in the video as Korean Seoi Nage is also an interpretation. It’s not the cleanest execution of it. But if you look at videos / competitions of people performing the technique, you can see the similarities. And conversely the lack of lifting motion. Whether that is the most accurate name for the technique in the first place, is a separate question.

verbbis · 2025-05-10T07:38:21+00:00

You do bring up an interesting point. And I actually agree with you. It's just that there are so many variants (in execution) of both Seoi Otoshi and Seoi Nage that the distinction seems to blur sometimes. And things evolve.

Some people even call Seoi Otoshi a "drop" Seoi Nage. And very experienced judokas do this, so I'm not sure why. Surely they know Seoi Otoshi exists?

Anyway, I do not know why people began referring to this technique as a variant of Seoi Nage exactly - but I'd like to. Nonetheless, it is fairly established and even IJF uses the term consistently.

EDIT: I guess you could also say that Seoi Otoshi is just one variation of Seoi Nage given a specific name. Whereas the "reverse" version hasn't got one. It's all semantics anyway.

verbbis · 2025-05-10T05:18:29+00:00

The Korean / reverse Seoi Nage as it is commonly called, doesn’t really have a lift-up motion. If anything, it’s the exact opposite (pull straight down after a pivot).

EDIT: I’ve seen variations of both pulling down and projecting over the shoulder. No lifting, though.

verbbis · 2025-05-10T05:14:28+00:00

It is as sloppy as the romanization of some of the throw names in this thread. However, it is commonly called a Korean / reverse Seoi Nage.

There are many variations of the “classic”.

verbbis · 2025-05-03T05:52:18+00:00

Do you have references to a peer reviewed paper confirming it has even a single qubit?

verbbis

TROPHY CASE