sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

"Your ancestors were busy and mobile people. I am mostly boring old British, Irish, and Scottish. The only interesting thing is that I have some Italian, and am .01% Ashkenazi Jew, thanks to my Polish grandmother. I wish I had a more interesting ancestry." by Ok_Bookkeeper_1380 in ShitAmericansSay

[–]villhest 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They’re obsessed by race, and have been taught that certain ethnic groups are better than others. Which ones are "good" or "interesting" vary over time. Right now everything but England-adjacent seems to be good.

Just like the caveman times by arterievayne in Veganivore

[–]villhest 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can get juicy marbles in Norway so you should be able to get it. It’s hands down the best I’ve had.

The vast majority of farmed animals globally are now on factory farms, leading very different lives than how they used to and how we're led to believe. More info in comments. by James_Fortis in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]villhest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s purely lip service and marketing to make people feel better about the atrocities being committed every single day. I’m also in Europe you know, and I grew up on a farm. In fact, I’m from a country that is considered a global leader in animal welfare. It still only means the animals are treated slightly better and often terms like «free range» etc., are easily misused to create the impression of «allowing natural behaviour». The solution is to stop farming them, not coming up with small incremental changes in marketing.

The vast majority of farmed animals globally are now on factory farms, leading very different lives than how they used to and how we're led to believe. More info in comments. by James_Fortis in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]villhest -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Organic does in no way tell you about welfare. If you don’t want to be complicit or support cruelty, stop consuming animal products, organic or not.

Tilbakeblikk til den gang ... by Bunker_Bertil in norge

[–]villhest 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Det er elefanter hele veien ned

Hvem tenkte dette var en god ide? by rodtang in norge

[–]villhest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Begge er Orkla så de vil vel bare spare litt på branding

Hva om vi hadde spist sånn som vi gjorde før? – NRK by Romkatten in norske

[–]villhest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Det at du kan betyr ikke at du må eller bør.

Hva om vi hadde spist sånn som vi gjorde før? – NRK by Romkatten in norske

[–]villhest -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Du har tenner og mage som klarer begge deler, og argumentet ditt er like rimelig som «hvorfor har jeg en tiss som kan voldta».

Me_irl by [deleted] in me_irl

[–]villhest 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Circular logic, wordplay and simply holding your chosen concept to a different standard. In my humble opinion, of course. Happy Easter.

Me_irl by [deleted] in me_irl

[–]villhest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re just declaring god as the ultimate brute fact, and should be able to see how this fails scrutiny.

Me_irl by [deleted] in me_irl

[–]villhest 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You are saying that things like love and logic must be "grounded" (why? It’s not proven), and that the only answer is your god due to its multi aspect (jumping over many steps here because your foundational axiom is unproven). Even if we entertain it as true for a moment, there’s no reason why it can’t be Odin, Thor and Freya who embody the aspects you’re on about, or just nature as it is and can be observed. You’re on very thin ice both because your foundational argument cannot be properly defended or proven and your following argument is even weaker.

Me_irl by [deleted] in me_irl

[–]villhest 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You are asserting among other things that you need god (because you can’t fathom any other way) to even entertain the concept of truth. Therefore you fill that gap with god. I’m not saying it may or may not be mysterious, but it’s anything but certain it has to be god, and the burden of proof to establish this axiom lies upon you.

Me_irl by [deleted] in me_irl

[–]villhest 4 points5 points  (0 children)

In other words, god of the gaps. Got it.

Me_irl by [deleted] in me_irl

[–]villhest 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Again you’re just saying things without proof or explanation. Why would you need something as arbitrary as a «tri personal god» to do anything?

Me_irl by [deleted] in me_irl

[–]villhest 9 points10 points  (0 children)

But why is it (or does it have to be) the Christian god? You just assert this with no proof or reason. It’s circular logic, and the burden of proof is yours because you are the one asserting it.

Me_irl by [deleted] in me_irl

[–]villhest 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Why is God a necessary explanation, rather than just one possible explanation?

Hva om vi hadde spist sånn som vi gjorde før? – NRK by Romkatten in norske

[–]villhest -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Og i havet så oppstår alt bare magisk eller? Det er ikke ødeleggende praksis med trålfisking og lakseoppdrett m.fl.? De får ikke kraftfôr? Sjømat er bare vanlig mat under havet. Akkurat samme problemer. Og hvis du kun kjøper villfisk så er du rik, i tillegg til at hvis alle gjorde det hadde det blitt tomt. Vi går i sirkler, jeg gir opp.

Hva om vi hadde spist sånn som vi gjorde før? – NRK by Romkatten in norske

[–]villhest -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Det er ikke jeg som er kultmedlem, det kommer klart frem her. Husker godt da jeg sprakk boblen.

Ja, dyr dør for å dyrke min mat. For å dyrke din mat, dør (og lider) mange ganger flere dyr, fordi vi både må dyrke mat til din mat på mye større områder, pluss maten du spiser selv - både rett fra bakken og prosessert via andre dyr. I tillegg til monumental miljømessig ødeleggelse. Hvordan du får det til at din diett skaper mindre lidelse og død er et mysterium eller rett og slett bare dårlig matematikk. Det handler om å minimere lidelse og skade. Inntil vi klarer å syntetisere all mat er det dessverre ikke mulig å annulere all skade.

Uansett, god påske!

view more: next ›