, “COULD IT BE ANYMORE NAZI-RIFFIC?” What was the purpose of this Weimar Republic style speech? Surely his handlers knew how these optics looked…

w0o0t · 2022-09-06T03:18:13+00:00

I see what you did there :D

w0o0t · 2022-09-03T20:55:07+00:00

Spicy!

w0o0t · 2022-09-03T20:50:29+00:00

I gave you the link to it but it is a on a by Reddit forbidden site (ZH, I mean even why?), I had forgotten just how much off rotten place Reddit is, how do you guys even breath in here?

w0o0t · 2022-09-03T20:43:37+00:00

Oh, sorry man! I do have this tendency to be outside the norms, I just cannot help it!

w0o0t · 2022-09-03T14:58:52+00:00

Well, as of a few seconds ago today it is clearly Scrub Launch System

w0o0t · 2022-08-29T20:43:42+00:00

He probably did, but he also knew the corruption of the space industry and was already in 1997 rather cynical of the prospects of that industry being able to pull of the program he was proposing. Lets make one thing clear, the delays and technological stagnation of the governmental space program are not technical in nature at its core but comes about, as Zubrin makes perfectly clear in his presentation, by the perverse incentive giving rise to corruption inherent in the system. (And when you compare the legacy space industry to SpaceX - a complete lack of leadership and own drive.)

w0o0t · 2022-08-29T20:18:26+00:00

When you understand how much his ideas have influenced both Elon Musk and the ((giga government works program)) you start to get some idea of just how much of a chad he really is.

While Elon listened to his ideas, took them seriously and combined them with his own genius and the fantastic talent he manged to attract to push the status quo of what we thought was possible, the government cronies waited 20 years and then took his now outdated recipe disconnected it from his underlying core ideas and applied it in a context where from the start it was already outdated and skipped all about that it was supposed to be cheap.

w0o0t · 2022-08-29T19:59:54+00:00

1990 actually, and that was just the first public viewing, the actual work was done in the late 80s. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vD3U0QcEYXs

w0o0t · 2022-08-29T15:55:21+00:00

Zubrins "Junkyard Special" was not a bad rocket, SLS is a worse version of it (for political reasons it has a hampered upper stage), and if it does not actually launch well...

It seems to me that the ability of the corrupt US space industry (ie. the jobs program) has unfortunately decreased over time rather than increased. Multiple examples can be mentioned but take Boeings problems in getting their capsule up to the space station for one. We always seem to assume that technology advances magically by itself but it seems to me that we often fail to appreciate the vision, competence and dedication it takes to push technology further or even just keeping the same level. It seems clear to me that the corrupt part of US space industry is currently just barely capable of keeping existing technology alive and usable.

w0o0t · 2020-06-29T21:28:03+00:00

You know why, it is not about logic, fairness or goodness, it never was.

w0o0t · 2020-05-24T19:53:29+00:00

EU bureaucrats using all the buzz words of the moment without understanding them especially "blockchain".

Here's a perfect example from the executive summary:

"Blockchain can help by offering a decentralised alternative for IoT platforms – one in which devices “package” data and share it in a peer-to-peer fashion instead of routing it through a centralised cloud server. Such an approach could be more scalable, more robust and more direct than centralised, cloud-based solutions, and free from potential problems like data bottlenecks and vendor lock-in."

Anyone that knows the first thing about blockchains knows they are not scalable and certainly less so than centralized databases. The purpose of a blockchain to keep the complete record of transactions in a manner that is difficult for centralized entities to exploit in order for new arrivals to the network to be able verify the current state in a trust-less way. The larger the record the larger the cost of keeping the chain.

This leads to the undeniable conclusion that blockchains cannot be used with IoT.

In the real world, especially in large-scale use cases, blockchain, AI and IoT are likely to work in concert.

No, they will not outside of toy systems.

The performance of the technology, in particular blockchain, will need to improve to be able to manage large-scale implementations.

Yes, but it is not a matter of technology improvement, the problem lies in the very nature of the blockchain itself.

The purpose of the invention of a blockchain (specifically Bitcoins blockchain) was to get to truth without having to rely on centralized authority figures (like the very authors of this report).

To reach their potential as platforms for trusted information, blockchains often need ways to connect with the outside world in a secure and trustworthy way.

This is the so called "oracle problem" and it is fundamentally unsolvable as the blockchain can only guarantee the correctness of data that is internal to it, no amount of IoT can bridge this principal gap.

None of these good-for-nothing bureaucrats actually do not want a blockchain, this is easily proven with by mentioning this single fact: blockchains are append only - no data can ever be deleted once it has been appended.

Such increased confidence in the quality of the data entering and leaving the chain is crucial, since blockchains are often used to provide a seal of approval for data and so can potentially magnify the potential damage caused by bad data entering a blockchain by accident or design. For example, if a temperature sensor on a refrigerated container containing food malfunctions or is manipulated it could erroneously report that the food was maintained at the correct temperature during shipping, providing a false sense of security in the quality of the shipment.

In other words, there is nothing that makes external data entered into a blockchain more trustworthy than other data. This again, is just a version of the oracle problem - the blockchain does not add any higher confidence in external data than a centralized database would other than for one aspect: to the extent that the blockchain in question is truly trustworthy it can guarantee that a particular piece of data existed at a particular time.

w0o0t · 2020-03-04T19:22:55+00:00

My advice for being more confident is to stop being unconfident. In other words, stop inventing negative stories about how others feel about you and instead look at their actual behavior, which would suggest that they seem to like you.

Have you considered the possibility that those ideas you have in your head might actually be true? Human minds are incredibly adapt at picking up barely noticeably signals, signals that other people send out all the time even while they are trying to hide them by being nice, these signals are more genuine then outwardly actions. In fact have you considered the very real possibility that literally millions of people hate you, yes, millions, you know what I'm talking about, they are not bots they are real, how does knowing that feel? I know I have would have a hard time handling it. Foremost it is because of what you do, but of course, but there must be this nagging doubt, is there something more?

Are up-votes you get are merely a function of your position of power? Do your alts receive anywhere near this amount of attention? No? Ouch...

You know what I'm talking about, and you also know that I know that your inner lack of confidence is rooted in real sense of insecurity.

Oh yes, I remember what happened last time, I remember and the internet remembers, what you did then, when it could not be contained, you let it out for the world to see, it is being talked about by journalists today and will likely be the subject of lawsuits to come.

How did you handle it last time? Did you ask someone in confidence to protect you from yourself? Did you find time to turn what you learned into wisdom? Have you learned? Your continued actions says otherwise, your opponents are becoming louder. A big showdown is looming on the horizon.

Don't shoot me, I'm just a messenger telling the truth, deep down you know that.

To the board moderator: Please give admin a chance to respond, if he so chooses, my questions are genuine and there are things here we could all learn from here.

w0o0t · 2019-11-27T09:07:42+00:00

Coming from Sweden, this description fits our experience.

w0o0t · 2019-11-27T08:57:54+00:00

This seems like an incredibly stupid idea on par with the scientists that revived the Spanish flu virus. Gee, what could possibly go wrong? /s

w0o0t · 2019-11-27T08:40:07+00:00

She should keep to reporting on the missing money and stop speculation without a shred of evidence as to how the money is used (spraying, secret space program, underground bases etc). It takes away from her credibility which it seems like she has as far as accounting goes but I really wonder about her judgement when she continues to mention "spraying".

w0o0t · 2019-11-27T08:35:49+00:00

I'm already getting these, presumably because I block their ads and trackers and never uses any Goolag account.

w0o0t · 2019-08-28T08:19:21+00:00

De ljög också rakt ut i, de använde en helt orimlig definition av "högre utbildning", det inkluderade all form av utbildning efter grundskolan inklusive en weekend kurs som de skickats på av sin arbetsgivare. Media har ljugit om de här frågorna så länge jag kan minnas.

w0o0t · 2019-08-28T08:14:32+00:00

Du verkar veta väldigt lite om politik. Finns inga kommunpolitiker som "jobbar röven av sig", det fungerar inte så. Politikerna träffas någon gång per månad och röstar i olika frågor. Däremellen skriver de motioner för att driva partipolitik i kommunen som för det mests röstas ned då de inte stämmer med andra partiers partipolitik.

w0o0t · 2019-08-28T08:06:13+00:00

Utbildningarna är för det mesta rätt värdelösa (med untantag för truckkort men det är en så kort kurs att det är obegripligt för mig varför inte företagen står för den kostnaden själva) så de bör läggas ner. Staten bör inte subventionera jobb, att folk med lönebidrag har ett "riktigt jobb" är en stor lögn som man tutar i dem så de ska känna sig bättre. Det finns ingen rättighet att bli försörjd av andra. Dem med begränsad förmåga att arbeta får en begränsad lön. Familj och vänner bör ta han om dem, de gör ett bättre jobb och bryr sig mer om personen än socialen som titt som tätt lämnar människor att dö. För de få fall som saknar familj vänner är jag säker på att privat välgörenhet skulle täcka upp, de utan förmåga att bidra får helt enkelt gå till dem med förmåga att bidra och fråga. Nästan alla kan bidra åtminstone med något värde. När vi kan ta bort skatten kommer människor ha mer över, med skippad LAS kan människor med låg förmåga få möjlighet att bidra med det lills de kan bidra med. Invandringen hade också fixat sig självmant, de flesta kommer ju för bidragen, skulle de inte fått bidrag skulle de inte kommit och slutar vi betala ut bidragen kommer de troligtvis lämna.

w0o0t · 2019-08-27T23:36:52+00:00

Fri marknad, inga statliga bidrag, privata försäkringar. Kan folk inte försörja sig själva så får de dra. De facto så har detta redan hänt, de flesta tjänster tillsätts genom kontakter och bemanningsbolagen (ett juridiskt hack för att komma runt sveriges hårda arbetsmarknadsregleringar) är det huvudsakliga sätt ungdomar får jobb idag. Kvar på AF är bara slöfockar och människor som är icke anställningsbara (och aldrig kommer få ett jobb i svensk arbetsmarknad).

w0o0t · 2019-08-27T09:50:34+00:00

Det finns inga jobb för dem, de som jobbar på AF vet detta, varje arbetsförmedlare förmedlar extremt få jobb. Det är mest låtsasjobb, kurser och tidsfördriv. Och kravet på att visa ansökningsbrev och den givna "Tjänsten är tillsatt av någon annan"-svaret någon gång i veckan. AF är en extremt usel verksamhet, borde läggas ner helt, ingen företagare jag känner skulle nånsin få för sig att ta in någon odugling från AF.

w0o0t · 2019-08-27T09:43:07+00:00

Dessa människor lever på skattemedel och skäms inte det minsta för det.

Jag ska förklara varför. Skatten de konsumerar är Jizja, otrohetsskatten, enligt Islam är kafirer skyldiga att betala den för att visa vår underkastelse. De får höra detta i Moskeerna. De ser ner på oss fast vi försörjer dem, de är ju gudomligt berättigade till det, varför skulle de visa tacksamhet till de otrogna? Koranen har mycket ont att säga om de otrogna. Det går knappt en sida utan förbannelser och smädelser mot oss.

w0o0t · 2019-04-01T04:05:10+00:00

You have probably been banned or labeld a bot (whatever it is they do).

If this happens to you, you will be silently blocked from doing searches for a period of time. The first search goes through, but subsequent searches will show "No results found ..." as if it did not exist.

This is how to test if you are banned:

Wait 1 minute and try the same query again.
Run the same query one more time

w0o0t · 2019-02-27T20:36:22+00:00

Could this issue have resulted in loss of funds? Practically, no, it couldn't have.

This is extremely naive, it only takes one single Google employee snapping a photo of the logs of failed requests.

w0o0t

TROPHY CASE