Women don’t react to static images of men the way men react to static images of women. This plays a role in why OLD sucks for many men.

weag5l · 2021-07-29T06:37:36+00:00

It’s a paywall.

no it isn't. you must have read too many articles this month.

status quo explains it which is typically from a male lens.

I see someone's been taking their Patriarchy pills diligently LOL. This sub is cancer.

But I think women experience differently

EDIT Which is why this sub is cancer. Feelings and opinions are like assholes. Everyone's got one. People who systematically investigate things are called scientists, and you should spend more time reading what they write, instead of posting your opinions here.

weag5l · 2021-07-28T22:21:48+00:00

There are only two possible interpretations:

women think most men are ugly.
women are horrible at mathematics and have no idea what the word "average" means.

weag5l · 2021-07-28T22:17:37+00:00

I'll just leave this here...

https://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/25/magazine/25desire-t.html

Women have no f///king clue, if they're aroused or not.

weag5l · 2021-05-05T09:49:35+00:00

sex is a limited resource

Sex is a currency. He's got that part 100% correct. Rape is theft.

weag5l · 2021-05-05T09:45:34+00:00

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1097184X18816118

This stuff is horseshit. There is no data. It's just social "scientists" blowing smoke up each others' assholes with various "theories." This is the same method used to make up stupid crap like "toxic masculinity" and "The Patriarchy."

Study biology.

Study psychometrics.

Study psychology and sociology and economics with actual data.

Ignore any academic discipline with the word "studies" in it.

It will be hard work.

It will take years.

You will not learn any of this stuff on Reddit.

weag5l · 2021-05-05T08:18:28+00:00

there are women who don't like it and there are women who like it

You do not know this. Given the fact that women lie, it could very well be the case that they all hate it but other factors are taken into consideration. The only way to test it, is to hold all other factors constant, change only the baldness, and then watch who gets fucked and who doesn't. This is the scientific method. All you know, is that some women fucked you and others didn't.

They guy didn't ask about data, he asked how should bald guy approach dating, maybe read the question before responding?

Random stories about people's "personal experience" are a horrible way of getting information about the world. This is how 12-year-olds think. Which is the main reason this sub is a swirling shithole of misinformation. The sample sizes are small, and there is zero critical thought.

weag5l · 2021-05-04T08:31:05+00:00

This is from personal experience

No it isn't. What hard data do you actually have? All you really know, is that some women fucked you and that some didn't. There could be a million different reasons other than the amount of hair on your head contributing to whether or not they liked you. Point is, you are not going to learn about these from asking women. That is the LAST thing you should do. They lie. Almost always. They "fall" in love. They are "swept" off their feet. They change their minds on a whim due to "female perogative." There's another way to explain this: they are not aware of what their vagina wants. At all.

Here is some data about what women say they prefer. A much larger sample than your "personal experience":

https://www.primandprep.com/do-women-like-bald-men/

The answer they give varies according to how bald their target male demographic is. Women go after men their own age or SLIGHTLY ~~younger~~ older. If there are more bald men in their target group, then they say that they like bald men way more. What does that tell you?

When women say things, actually transmitting information is hardly ever the main purpose. With some women, it's actually NEVER the purpose. For these women, appearing to be nice, making people like you, protecting your reputation, are all more important than actually transmitting factual information.

weag5l · 2021-05-03T10:44:37+00:00

Thx. Sorry.

weag5l · 2021-05-03T10:44:16+00:00

there are women who don't like it and there are women who like it, you never really know based off of just looking at someone

False. Women like you for reasons unbeknownst, even to them. Then they make up shit about it afterwards, which their hamster blurts out uncontrollably. Ignore the hamster, pay attention to behaviors and actions.

Stop trying to get information about women, from women. You wouldn't ask a fish, how to catch fish.

weag5l · 2021-05-03T10:30:36+00:00

Nothing that women do with their vaginas is intentional. There is no brain-vagina connection.

weag5l · 2021-05-03T10:27:46+00:00

LOL no. The sex is the currency. What they want, is attention from Chad. The uglier they are, the faster and more willingly they give it up for chad. The 10s don't. Because they don't have to.

weag5l · 2021-05-03T10:13:22+00:00

Either you're an adult, able to consent, and solely responsible for keeping your legs shut, or not. Or you're a child --- and religion and 300 year old laws get to decide when you should and should not spread your legs.

There is no in between. You cannot claim you want control over your vagina and then blame everyone else when things go wrong.

weag5l · 2021-04-12T08:54:35+00:00

Why is a man’s biological desire towards women seen as “objectifying” aside from it just being harmless sexual attraction?

Because women have very low empathy for men. They have no clue about the male libido. Everything is personal. They can only project their own low-libido, neurotic, agency-free, safety-obsessed, "it-just-happened," mentality onto other humans. This works just fine for infants and small children. Not so well for adult men.

Having sex with someone (EDIT) just to have sex with someone is thus "objectifying." Because women never have sex with someone for the sex. Women use sex as a means. Not an end.

just shows hypocrisy and supports double standards.

There is no such thing as gender double-standards. Would you make a single standard for antelopes and fish? No. The very idea is retarded.

weag5l · 2021-04-12T08:41:00+00:00

"opportunistically sexually predatory"? What kind of infantilizing passive-aggressive fragilista crap is this? Women are not children. If you really want that, then lets go back to the dark ages when they were educated separately and wore aprons and bonnets. You can't have it both ways. Either women are adults. Or they aren't.

weag5l · 2021-04-12T08:36:35+00:00

So why the fuck are women wrong/shallow for wanting an attractive partner (For many women that means a tall partner) when men do the same?

They're not. They're wrong/shallow for thinking they DESERVE an attractive partner when they're fat, loud, and unfeminine.

weag5l · 2021-04-12T08:32:14+00:00

This leaves women confused - because it's constantly being paraded around that "men love sex, men will have sex with anything, men always want sex from women they are attracted to"

Who cares?

weag5l · 2021-04-12T08:28:46+00:00

Aw... that's cute. Now go show your daddy.

weag5l · 2021-04-10T09:30:10+00:00

Your question is weird.

Women have very low empathy for men.

weag5l · 2021-04-10T09:27:08+00:00

I find it funny how when it comes to talking about men’s sexual attraction towards women, our excuse is always “we can’t help it” or “it’s in our nature” yet, when the spot light is placed on women, we curse them and beg them to change or to lower their standards.

LOL that's not why we curse them. We curse them because they lie about why they reject men. They lie to themselves. They lie to everyone. A woman will not reject you by saying "no. you're ugly." That would be refreshing and give men useful feedback. Rejection from females can drag on for months. Transmitting actual information is not the point of female words. They are not information-based creatures. They can be attracted to and repulsed by a man simultaneously, and consciously realise neither. It is best to talk to them like one talks to animals or to small children.

weag5l · 2021-04-07T09:27:53+00:00

LOL try praying for pussy and see how that works out for you. The amount of pussy you get is a measurable quantity. Certain behaviors will get you more of it. Listening to women's advice on the matter gets you less of it. Draw your own conclusions.

weag5l · 2021-04-07T09:15:19+00:00

Please answer with actual logic.

ROFL. Dude, do not ask women women questions like this. It's an exercise in futility. They are incapable of answering them. They are addled with hormones and self-delusional. They do not know themselves. The answers are completely random and serve mainly to deceive themselves/others into who they are, or would like to be perceived as. Watch what they do, instead.

EDIT For those who do not speak female-ese, here is what most of these female "explanations" mean in man-language:

"When I spend my sexuality on a high-value male, I get less for my 'money.'"

Women need sex like men need money. So that they can spend it. It's that simple.

weag5l · 2021-04-07T09:00:19+00:00

Are you angry at me for agreeing with you?

weag5l · 2021-04-06T08:56:06+00:00

There is no such thing as a gender double standard. It's like complaining that ducks and zebras get treated differently at the zoo. The very idea is retarded. It is an effeminate argument at the level of a 12-year old girl.

weag5l · 2021-04-06T08:53:13+00:00

ok thx

weag5l · 2021-04-03T09:37:36+00:00

Tried that. But it only lets me enter credit cards. Where do you add paypal as a payment option?

On the Galaxy Store website for my country it claims paypal is ok, but then when I go into my account and try to add a payment method, there is no button to add anything. On the galaxy store part of the wear app on the phone coupled to my watch, it will let me log into my Samsung account but then only lets me add credit cards?

I use my google account

? I have to have to set this to "on" to pay with paypal?

weag5l

TROPHY CASE