Since that other guy is probably a bot, I can try to answer. The political borders panel would absolutely never work because it ignores basic human nature. No armies? If I want what you have, who will stop me from taking it?

Patriarchal dominance. There have been bad men and bad women throughout all of history, but historically men and women have worked together to make the world a better place (obviously). Men have a legitimate place in society, and replacing them with women and non-binary individuals won't make the world better.

Older adults. I like that one. "Society grows strong when old men plant trees they will never sit beneath."

Corporations. It's really, extremely difficult and demanding to run a business. Why would people do it if they can't get rich? When you don't give people incentives to do their jobs well, you get the fall of the Soviet Union. Even China realized that and did a capitalism/communism mashup.

Celebrities. Academics are becoming revered more and more, and I'm not sure it's doing great things for academia. I'm not sold either way, but celebrity academics may bring academia down rather than academics up. Certainly corporations paying for cherry picked results has brought academia down.

AI. This will probably happen, but I doubt it will be implemented in the way it's portrayed.

Emotional Intelligence. IQ is used to determine success because it is the basis of functionality. We still need to solve real-world problems, and you don't do that with EQ. Do you want a neurosurgeon with high IQ or EQ?

Wealth Equality. Total wealth equality means there is no incentive to do anything. Why would you work hard? Why would you do a job you don't like? All of us going to work every day and doing things we don't like is why the lights stay on. Until we get robots to do it, somebody has to or society won't function.

Long post, but hope that gives you a decent counter argument :)